Evaluation of solvents for asphalt extraction
Source abstract
Abstract
The laboratory evaluation of the performance of a number of asphalt extraction solvents was conducted. The performance testing was conducted on unmodified and polymer modified asphalt binder with the Bitumen Degradation Test (BDT) and on polymer modified and RAP mixtures with centrifuge extraction. The chemical interaction between the binder and the solvent was analysed by Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectrometry. Several commonly used extraction solvents were tested including trichloroethylene, dichloromethane, toluene and xylene along with a number of alternative agents. The alternative agents included chlorinated, petroleum-based and bio-sourced solvents. The chlorinated solvents (trichloroethylene-TCE, dichloromethane and two higher exposure limit candidate agents) were found to be the best solvents to dissolve the binder in the BDT. These solvents were tested in the final round with centrifuge extraction, where they were evaluated based on the ability to dissolve the binder and evaporate after the extraction. While TCE had the best performance, some candidates were found to perform almost as effectively as the trichloroethylene, making them viable alternatives to the latter.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Pavement and Transportation Technology (CPATT), University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Canada
Empa, Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland
Kersol Inc., Mississauga, Canada
Funding
Ontario Centres of Excellence
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. Alavi, M. Z., He, Y. & Jones, D. (2014). Investigation of the effect of reclaimed asphalt pavement and reclaimed asphalt shingles on the performance properties of asphalt binders: Interim Report (No. UCPRC-TM-2014-06). University of California Pavement Research Center UC Davis, UC Berkeley.
2. Bechtel, D. (2012). A short review of 1-bromopropane literature and contrast to trichloroethylene use in aggregate analysis. PRTox Consulting Inc.
3. 10.3141/1712-1010.3141/1712-10 ↗
4. Diefenderfer, S. D. (2014). Developing a laboratory protocol for asphalt binder recovery (No. VCTIR 15-R7).
5. 10.1006/enfo.2000.001110.1006/enfo.2000.0011 ↗
6. Glor M. · Pharmaceutical Engineering · 2010 · 30 · 56
7. 10.1080/14680629.2012.65707210.1080/14680629.2012.657072 ↗
8. Hansen C. M. · 2012
9. 10.1617/s11527-018-1170-710.1617/s11527-018-1170-7 ↗
10. 10.4103/0973-029X.6429910.4103/0973-029X.64299 ↗
11. 10.1016/S0016-2361(00)00121-610.1016/S0016-2361(00)00121-6 ↗
12. McDaniel, R. S., Soleymani, H., Anderson, R. M., Turner, P. & Peterson, R. (2000). Recommended use of reclaimed asphalt pavement in the superpave mix design method (No. Web Document 30).
13. Mikhailenko P. · 2017
14. 10.1617/s11527-015-0663-x10.1617/s11527-015-0663-x ↗
15. 10.1617/s11527-015-0585-710.1617/s11527-015-0585-7 ↗
16. Monterpara, A. & Giuliani, F. (1999). Control of binder content in bituminous mixes by means of an automatic apparatus. TRANSCOM ‘99. Presented at the TRANSCOM ‘99, Zilina, Slovakia.
17. 10.1080/14680629.2010.969033410.1080/14680629.2010.9690334 ↗
18. 10.1016/S0016-2361(99)00103-910.1016/S0016-2361(99)00103-9 ↗
19. Stroup-Gardiner, M. & Nelson, J. W. (2000). Use of normal propyl bromide solvents for extraction and recovery of asphalt cements (No. 00–06).
20. The Bitumen Industry - A Global Perspective (2nd ed.). (2011). Asphalt Institute, Eurobitume.
21. Va B. · Neurotoxicology · 1981 · 2 · 567
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.08.004 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.02210.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.022 ↗