Investigation of shear strength of interface between roadbase and geosynthetics using large-scale single-stage and multi-stage direct shear test
Source abstract
Abstract
The application of geosynthetics in the road pavement industry as a reinforcement has increased dramatically in recent years. Geosynthetic inclusions can significantly: (i) increase the bearing capacity of the pavement, (ii) prolong the road service life, (iii) reduce maintenance costs, iv) diminish unfavourable large vertical and lateral pavement deformations; and (v) prevent reflective cracking and reduce crack propagation. Although considerable research has been carried out on the interfaces between soils and geosynthetics through large-scale direct shear testing, there is a lack of research in the interfaces between roadbase materials and geosynthetics in pavement engineering. The main innovation of this paper is to investigate the shear strength behaviour of the interfaces existing in a geosynthetic-reinforced pavement. One interface is existing between roadbase and geosynthetic reinforcement for base reinforcement; another one is existing between roadbase and subgrade with geosynthetic reinforcement for subgrade stabilisation. Therefore, a series of laboratory, large-scale direct shear tests was carried out on roadbase materials with and without the inclusion of geosynthetics, under applied normal stresses of 25, 50, 75 or 100 kPa, representing the magnitude of the overburden pressure in the pavement. In addition, theoretical interpretations are developed to back up the experimental results, and to quantify the contribution of different shear strength components mobilised along the interface between roadbase materials and geogrids. Finally, the applicability of multi-stage, large-scale direct shear box testing is assessed by comparing the results obtained with those from conventional single-stage tests obtained in the present experimental study.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Information Technology, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
UWE Global Pty Ltd, Shenzhen, China
References (39)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:7(540)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:7(540) ↗
2. 10.1520/GTJ10319J10.1520/GTJ10319J ↗
3. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.00510.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.005 ↗
4. Arulrajah A. · Advances in Materials Science and Engineering · 2015 · 110.1155/2015/235424 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000065210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000652 ↗
6. ASTM D5321. (2002). Standard test method for determining the coefficient of soil and geosynthetic or geosynthetic and geosynthetic friction by the direct shear method. ASTM Designation: D5321-02. ASTM, USA.
7. 10.1016/0266-1144(93)90008-C10.1016/0266-1144(93)90008-C ↗
8. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.04.00110.1016/j.geotexmem.2006.04.001 ↗
9. 10.3141/2655-1010.3141/2655-10 ↗
10. 10.1139/cgj-2014-039910.1139/cgj-2014-0399 ↗
11. 10.1680/gein.15.0001110.1680/gein.15.00011 ↗
12. 10.1520/GTJ10959J10.1520/GTJ10959J ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000177510.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001775 ↗
14. Hazirbaba K. · Road Materials and Pavement Design · 2017
15. Hormdee D. · International Journal of GEOMATE · 2012 · 2 · 140
16. Jewell R. A. · 1996
17. Jewell, R. A., Milligan, G. W. E., Sarsby, R. W. & Dubois, D. (1984). Interaction between soil and geogrids. In: Symposium on Polymer Grid Reinforcement in Civil Engineering, ICE, London, Paper 1.3.
18. 10.1139/t99-12410.1139/t99-124 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.03.00210.1016/j.geotexmem.2008.03.002 ↗
20. 10.1680/jgein.15.0003710.1680/jgein.15.00037 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000015010.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000150 ↗
22. Lopes M. L. · 2002 · 57
23. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2011.06.00310.1016/j.enggeo.2011.06.003 ↗
24. 10.1080/10298436.2014.94312810.1080/10298436.2014.943128 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.00310.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.03.003 ↗
26. 10.3208/sandf1972.29.1810.3208/sandf1972.29.18 ↗
27. Piratheepan J. · Advances in Civil Engineering Materials · 2013 · 2 · 2510.1520/ACEM20120009 ↗
28. Richards, E. A. & Scott, J. D. (1985). Soil geotextile frictional properties. Second Canadian Symposium on Geotextiles and Geomenbranes, Edmonton. 13–24.
29. Sakleshpur V. A. · International Journal of Pavement Engineering · 2017 · 1
30. Shukla S. K. · 200210.1680/gata.31173 ↗
31. 10.1080/14680629.2008.969012410.1080/14680629.2008.9690124 ↗
32. 10.1080/1029843080227982710.1080/10298430802279827 ↗
33. 10.1680/gein.12.0003710.1680/gein.12.00037 ↗
34. 10.1680/jgein.15.0003010.1680/jgein.15.00030 ↗
35. 10.1680/jgein.18.0002210.1680/jgein.18.00022 ↗
36. 10.1088/1361-6501/aacb8a10.1088/1361-6501/aacb8a ↗
37. Xu Y. · Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2018 · 30 · 0401820610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002411 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.00510.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.10.005 ↗
39. Zornberg, J. G. (2011). Advances in the Use of Geosynthetic in Pavement Design. Invited Keynote Paper, Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Geosynthetics, India Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India, September 23–24, 3–21.