The role of predictive models for resilient modulus of unbound materials in pavement FWD-deflection assessment
Source abstract
Abstract
The unbound materials in pavements are stress dependent and any changes in the moisture content will change the stress level and, therefore, the material behaviour. The objectives of this paper are to 1) investigate the stress dependency coupled with moisture sensitivity of the unbound materials on the estimated in-situ Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) deflection response; and 2) determine the most appropriate resilient modulus predictive model to predict the stiffness of the unbound materials without conducting backcalculation analysis. In the proposed approach, one stress-based constitutive model and one approximate empirical predictive model were evaluated in conjunction with the predicted and measured soil moisture content profiles in eight different unbound material types. Measured FWD data at four Long-Term Pavement Performance-Seasonal Monitoring Programme (LTPP-SMP) locations in Maine, Minnesota, Texas and Montana were used to estimate the in situ measured deflection. Then, layer elastic analysis was conducted using the soil moisture profile, asphalt temperature, material physical properties, groundwater table and depth to bedrock to examine the sensitivity of each model in the pavement response. The findings show that for non-plastic soil materials, the presented empirical model is adequate to predict the in-situ FWD deflection. In contrast, both approximate and stress-dependent models overestimate the in-situ pavement surface deflection for the plastic soils evaluated in this study.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of New Hampshire, Durham, USA
Funding
Federal Highway Administration
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. Carmichael III, R. F. & Stuart, E. (1985). Predicting resilient modulus: A study to determine the mechanical properties of subgrade soils. Transportation Research Record TRR 1043, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council (pp. 145–148). Washington, DC.
2. Cary, C. E. & Zapata, C. E. (2010). Enhanced model for resilient response of soils resulting from seasonal changes as implemented in mechanistic–empirical pavement design guide. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2170, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies (pp. 36–44). Washington, DC.
3. 10.1080/14680629.2011.969526310.1080/14680629.2011.9695263 ↗
4. Dai, S. & Zollars, J. (2002). Resilient modulus of minnesota road research project subgrade soil. Transportation Research Record 1786, TRB, National Research Council (pp. 20–28). Washington, DC.10.3141/1786-03 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:5(774)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1990)116:5(774) ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:7(663)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1997)123:7(663) ↗
7. EdrisJr, E. V. & Lytton, R. L. (1976, May). Dynamic properties of subgrade soils including environmental effects (Texas Transportation Institute Report No. TTI-2-18-74-164-3). College Station, TX: Texas A&M University.
8. Elshaer, M. H. (2017). Assessing the mechanical response of pavements during and after flooding (Doctoral dissertation). University of New Hampshire.
9. 10.1080/10298436.2017.136676710.1080/10298436.2017.1366767 ↗
10. 10.1080/14680629.2017.128335610.1080/14680629.2017.1283356 ↗
11. Erlingsson, S. (2010). Modelling of rutting performance – Comparison with LTPP Road Sections (NordFoU PPM, Nordic Cooperation Program, report no 2.4.1). Retrieved from http://www.nordfou.org
12. Fredlund D. G. · Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering · 1977 · 103 · 447
13. 10.1139/t94-06110.1139/t94-061 ↗
14. George, K. P. (2004). Prediction of resilient modulus from soil index properties (Final Report, MS-DOT-RD-04-172).
15. 10.1139/cgj-2014-033910.1139/cgj-2014-0339 ↗
16. Huang Y. H. · 2004
17. Khoury, C., Khoury, N. & Miller, G. (2010). Effect of suction hysteresis on resilient modulus of fine-grained soil. Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting Compendium Papers (CD-ROM) (pp. 10–14). Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC.
18. 10.1080/14680629.2016.123550610.1080/14680629.2016.1235506 ↗
19. 10.3141/1687-0610.3141/1687-06 ↗
20. Moossazadeh, J. & Witczak, M. W. (1981). Prediction of subgrade moduli for soil that exhibits nonlinear behavior. Transportation Research Records. 810, Transportation Research Board (pp. 9–17), Washington, DC.
21. NCHRP 1-28A. (2004). National cooperative highway research program, laboratory determination of resilient modulus for flexible pavement design. Research Results Digest, 285, TransportationResearch Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
22. NCHRP 1-37A. (2002). National cooperative highway research program, input data for the calibration and validation of the 2002 design guide for new constructed flexible pavement sections. Development of 2002 Guide for the Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, 280, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
23. 10.1080/14680629.2017.132366210.1080/14680629.2017.1323662 ↗
24. Perera, Y. Y., Zapata, C. E., Houston, W. N. & Houston, S. L. (2005). Prediction of the soil-water characteristic curve based on grain-size-distribution and index properties. Advances in Pavement Engineering (pp. 1–12).10.1061/40776(155)4 ↗
25. Santha, B. L. (1994). Resilient modulus of subgrade soils (1994): Comparison of two constitutive equations. Transportation Research Record 1462 (pp. 79–90). TRB, National Research Council, Washington, DC.
26. Seed, H. B., Mitry, F. G., Monismith, C. L. & Chan, C. K. (1967). Prediction of pavement deflection from laboratory repeated load tests (NCHRP Rep. No. 35). Washington, DC.
27. Truss, D. P. (2004). Pavement deflection data as a tool for the prediction of Freeze/Thaw response (Master’s Thesis). University of Tennessee.
28. Witczak, M. W., Houston, W. N. & Andrei, D. (2000). Resilient modulus as function of soil moisture – A study of the expected changes in resilient modulus of the unbound layers with changes in moisture for 10 LTPP sites. Development of the 2002 Guide DD-3.35 for the Development of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures, NCHRP 1-37 A, Inter Team Technical Report (Seasonal 2).
29. Witczak, M. & Uzan, J. (1988). The universal airport design system,Report I of IV. Granular material characterization. Rep. to Department of Civil Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, Md.
30. Yau, A. & Von Quintus, H. L. (2002). Study of LTPP laboratory resilient modulus test data and response characteristics (No. FHWA-RD-02-051).