journal article·2018-11-17

Key parameters controlling dynamic modulus of crushed reclaimed asphalt paving–powdered rock–Portland cement blends

Nilo Cesar Consoli, Eduardo Pasche, Luciano Pivoto Specht, Mateus Tanski

Publisher page

Abstract

In order to minimise the impact on the environment of reclaimed asphalt paving (RAP) disposal, a policy was established in Brazil determining that such residue should be recycled and used in roadways whenever possible. Mixing RAP with powdered rock and Portland cement to be used as a base/sub-base of pavements has been experienced with interesting results. Though, there is a lack of studies on the mechanical properties (unconfined compressive – qu and split tensile – qt) and the viscoelastic behaviour (dynamic modulus – E* and phase angle – δ) of RAP – powdered rock – Portland cement blends. The present research aims at quantifying the influence of amounts of Portland cement (C) and the effect of the porosity (η) of the compacted blend in improving qu, qt and E* of the mixtures. This paper advances in the understanding of the key parameters controlling strength and stiffness of compacted RAP – powdered rock – Portland cement mixtures by quantifying the influence of porosity/cement index (η/Civ) on qu and qt strengths and mainly on the viscoelastic behaviour (E* and δ), including the effect of frequency (F) and the testing temperatures (TT). A single qt/qu relationship equal to 0.17 was found, being independent of the η/Civ. On the other side, it is shown that η/Civ is an appropriate parameter to assess both the E* and the qu of the RAP – powdered rock – Portland cement mixtures studied. The phase angle (δ) of the compacted mix is not affected by η/Civ, being slightly influenced by F and TT. It varies from a minimum of 3° at low testing temperatures and high frequency to a maximum of 14°.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

,

References (51)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO. (2011). Determining dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt concrete mixtures. Washington, DC: AASHTO T 342.
2. ABNT. (1983). Mortar and concrete – test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical specimens. Rio de Janeiro: NBR 7222 (in Portuguese).
3. ABNT. (2001). Portland cement and other powdered material – determination of density. Rio de Janeiro: NBR NM 23 (in Portuguese).
4. ABNT. (2009a). Fine aggregate – determination of the bulk specific gravity and apparent specific gravity. Rio de Janeiro: NBR NM 52 (in Portuguese).
5. ABNT. (2009b). Coarse aggregate – determination of the bulk specific gravity, apparent specific gravity and water absorption. Rio de Janeiro: NBR NM 53 (in Portuguese).
6. ABNT. (2010). Mortar and concrete – test method for compressive strength of cylindrical specimens. Rio de Janeiro: NBR 5739 (in Portuguese).
7. ARRA. (1997). Pavement recycling guidelines for state and local governments participant’s reference book. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA-SA-98-042.
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000085010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000850 ↗
9. ASTM. (2010). Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. West Conshohocken: ASTM C 39.
10. ASTM. (2011a). Standard test methods for quantitative extraction of bitumen from bituminous paving mixtures. West Conshohocken: ASTM D 2172.
11. ASTM. (2011b). Standard test method for splitting tensile strength of cylindrical concrete specimens. West Conshohocken: ASTM C 496.
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.16210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.162 ↗
13. Bilodeau K. Sauzéat C. Di Benedetto H. & Olard F. (2012). Effect of reclaimed asphalt pavement on cement treated materials for road base layer. 5th Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress Istanbul.
14. Bilodeau K. Sauzéat C. Di Benedetto H. Olard F. & Bonneau D. (2011). Laboratory and in situ investigations of steel fiber reinforced compacted concrete containing reclaimed asphalt pavement. 90th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board Washington DC.
15. Carneiro F. L. L. E. & Barcellos A. (1953). Concrete tensile strength. Bulletin R.I.L.E.M.
16. Catton M. D. (1962). Soil-cement technology – a résumé. Research and Development Laboratories of the Portland Cement Association: Bulletin 136. [Reprinted from the Journal of PCA Research and Development Laboratories 4(1) 13–21].
17. 10.1061/AJGEB6.000115210.1061/AJGEB6.0001152 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.11.01610.1016/j.enggeo.2013.11.016 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000027810.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000278 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000056510.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000565 ↗
21. 10.1680/geot.8.P.08410.1680/geot.8.P.084 ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000018610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000186 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.06210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.062 ↗
24. 10.1680/geolett.13.0008110.1680/geolett.13.00081 ↗
25. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:2(197)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:2(197) ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000185810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001858 ↗
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000000810.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000008 ↗
28. 10.14295/transportes.v23i2.88010.14295/transportes.v23i2.880 ↗
29. 10.1080/14680629.2013.81284010.1080/14680629.2013.812840 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000164610.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001646 ↗
31. Di Benedetto H. & Corté J. F. (2005). Matériaux routiers. Tome 2 283p.
32. 10.1007/BF0248155310.1007/BF02481553 ↗
33. DNER. (1994). Aggregates – evaluation of the durability by the use of solutions of sodium or magnesium sulphate. DNER-ME 089. Rio de Janeiro RJ Brasil 6p (in Portuguese).
34. DNER. (1997). Equivalente de Areia. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: DNER-ME 054, 10p (in Portuguese).
35. DNER. (1998). Aggregates – determination of abrasion ‘Los Angeles’. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: DNER-ME 035. 6p (in Portuguese).
36. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000082010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000820 ↗
37. 10.1080/14680629.2009.969021110.1080/14680629.2009.9690211 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.13610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.136 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000026710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000267 ↗
40. 10.1680/macr.2006.58.5.31310.1680/macr.2006.58.5.313 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2005.05.00210.1016/j.cemconres.2005.05.002 ↗
42. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77475010.1080/14680629.2013.774750 ↗
43. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77475110.1080/14680629.2013.774751 ↗
44. Moore R. K. Kennedy T. W. & Hudson W. R. (1970). Factors affecting the tensile strength of cement-treated materials. Highway Research Record: Soil Stabilization: Multiple Aspects Washington D.C. HRB 315 64–80.
45. 10.1080/14680629.2016.121348310.1080/14680629.2016.1213483 ↗
46. Pasche E. Silva C. F. C. E. Pires G. M. Specht L. P. & Echeverria J. A. (2014). Study of the RAP characteristics and its applications to pavement layers in southern Brazil. Proceedings of the 21st Asphalt Meeting. Rio de Janeiro: IBP 1 1–12 (in Portuguese).
47. Pires, G. M., Specht, L. P., Pinheiro, G., Pereira, D. S., & Renz, E. M. (2016). Mechanical behavior of milled material after granulometric and chemical stabilization process by incorporation of cement and ash from ground rice hulls. Materia (UFRJ), 21(2), 365–384 (in Portuguese).
48. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000026810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000268 ↗
49. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000040410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000404 ↗
50. Specht L. P. Pires G. M. Vitorello T. Hirsch F. Cronst F. Bergmann E. C. & Tiefensee M. D. (2013). Utilization of RAP as pavement layer: Laboratory study and field applications. 42nd Annual Meeting in Pavements Gramado Brazil. (in Portuguese).
51. Wright Jr. F. (2001). FHWA recycled materials policy. Federal Highway Administration Washington DC. Retrieved from http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/legsregs/directives/policy/recmatpolicy.htm