The influence of frequency normalisation of FWD pavement measurements on backcalculated values of stiffness moduli
Source abstract
Abstract
Backcalculation is commonly used for determining stiffness moduli of pavement courses and its subgrade based on in situ deflection tests. However, the in situ test results are dependent on the frequency domain, which in turn has a significant influence on the backcalculation results. In this paper, one of the methods for normalising the frequency of load and displacement functions obtained from a dynamic impulse generated by a falling weight deflectometer (FWD) test is verified. The assessment of the method is carried out based on backcalculation results of pavement deflection tests induced by both the dynamic and static loads and an independent numerical experiment. The analysis carried out in this paper shows that the normalisation of vertical displacements and pavement loads to the values corresponding to the frequency of 0 Hz improves the accuracy of the backcalculation results. It can be concluded that the frequency normalisation procedure is an effective way for standardising the boundary conditions in the backcalculation of flexible pavements.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Civil Engineering, Poznan University of Technology, Poznan, Poland
School of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Funding
Polish National Centre for Research and Development · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/14680629.2004.968999210.1080/14680629.2004.9689992 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.03810.1016/j.advengsoft.2011.05.038 ↗
3. El-Badawy S. · International Journal of Advanced Engineering Sciences and Technologies · 2011 · 5 · 105
4. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.03710.1016/j.proeng.2013.04.037 ↗
5. Firlej S. · 2007
6. 10.1007/s10589-010-9329-310.1007/s10589-010-9329-3 ↗
7. Górnaś P. · Roads and Bridges – Drogi i Mosty · 2014 · 13 · 20310.7409/rabdim.014.014 ↗
8. 10.3141/1806-0410.3141/1806-04 ↗
9. 10.1007/978-3-642-04586-8_410.1007/978-3-642-04586-8_4 ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:1(73)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1998)124:1(73) ↗
11. 10.1139/l11-02610.1139/l11-026 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2008.09.00110.1016/j.soildyn.2008.09.001 ↗
13. 10.3846/13923730.2014.89798710.3846/13923730.2014.897987 ↗
14. Pożarycki A. · Journal Budownictwo i Architektura (in polish) · 2014 · 13 · 20310.35784/bud-arch.1818 ↗
15. Pożarycki A. · Roads and Bridges – Drogi i Mosty · 2017 · 16 · 10110.7409/rabdim.017.007 ↗
16. Qing-long Y. · Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development · 2014 · 8 · 1
17. Qiu X. · Mechanics in Engineering · 2008 · 30 · 51
18. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.03810.1016/j.engstruct.2015.05.038 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jsv.2004.02.05210.1016/j.jsv.2004.02.052 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.05010.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.050 ↗
21. 10.1080/10298436.2013.78607810.1080/10298436.2013.786078 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.00910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.009 ↗
23. 10.1139/L07-08310.1139/L07-083 ↗
24. 10.1139/t04-09810.1139/t04-098 ↗
25. Subagio B. · Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies · 2005 · 6 · 55
26. 10.3141/2005-0710.3141/2005-07 ↗