Evaluation of rutting potential of asphalts using resilient modulus test parameters
Source abstract
Abstract
Rutting potential of asphalts can be evaluated in the laboratory by different tests. Any visco-elastic parameter of the mix evaluated at a high pavement temperature can be considered to be a possible parameter to distinguish mixes in terms of their rutting susceptibility. In this study, the potential of the time lag (between load and deformation) observed in a resilient modulus test as an appropriate parameter to explain the rutting resistance of different mixes has been examined. Resilient modulus is a parameter routinely evaluated by many agencies and is used as an input for design and evaluation of pavements. Time lag values were extracted from the resilient modulus test conducted at 35°C and 50°C on asphalt mixes prepared with (a) nine different types of binder and one aggregate gradation and (b) nine different aggregate gradations and with VG30 binder. A wheel tracking test was conducted on the mixes at 60°C. Time lag has been found to be sensitive to bitumen type and aggregate gradation. A strong correlation was observed between the time lag and rut depth measured in the wheel tracking test. It is evident from the present study that time lag measured from the resilient modulus test, which is conducted routinely by many agencies, has the potential to be used as a mix rutting parameter.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur, India
University College of Engineering, Osmania University, Hyderabad, India
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Anderson D. A. · Proc. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1993 · 62 · 481
2. 10.1520/STP18186S10.1520/STP18186S ↗
3. Christensen D. · Practical Approaches to Hot-Mix Asphalt Mix Design and Production Quality Control Testing · 2007 · 62
4. Cooley L. A. · 2000
5. 10.1080/14680629.2009.969023610.1080/14680629.2009.9690236 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:6(578)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:6(578) ↗
7. 10.1080/14680629.2013.84419710.1080/14680629.2013.844197 ↗
8. 10.3141/1681-1110.3141/1681-11 ↗
9. 10.1617/s11527-010-9696-310.1617/s11527-010-9696-3 ↗
10. MoRTH · 2013
11. 10.3141/1789-0910.3141/1789-09 ↗
12. 10.1080/10298436.2014.92562210.1080/10298436.2014.925622 ↗
13. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:5(357)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:5(357) ↗
14. 10.3141/1789-1910.3141/1789-19 ↗
15. 10.1080/14680629.2002.968991910.1080/14680629.2002.9689919 ↗
16. 10.3141/1535-0310.3141/1535-03 ↗
17. 10.3141/1681-1210.3141/1681-12 ↗