Effects of interface condition characteristics on open-graded friction course top-down cracking performance
Source abstract
Abstract
Top-down cracking is a distress mode that is of particular concern for pavements with Open-Graded Friction Course (OGFC) because open-graded mixture has considerably lower resistance to fracture (lower fracture energy limit and lower resistance to damage) than dense-graded mixture. This particular cracking phenomenon initiates on the pavement surface and propagates downward; so because the OGFC layer is thin, cracking performance relies on the properties and characteristics of three components near the pavement surface: OGFC, underlying structural layer, and the interface between. For this reason, to increase the durability of pavements surfaced with OGFC, it is significant to ensure a quality fracture resistant bond between OGFC and the structural layer. This research investigated top-down cracking performance of OGFC with different tack coats using a newly developed composite specimen interface cracking (CSIC) test. In addition, X-ray computed tomography (CT) was employed to analyze the interface characteristics between OGFC and dense-graded HMA. HMA fracture mechanics was employed to quantify the effect of polymer modified asphalt emulsion (PMAE) on pavement top-down cracking resistance enhancement. Results clearly indicated that PMAE-created bonded interface conditions greatly increased pavement top-down cracking resistance as compared with conventional tack coat.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Ameri-Gaznon M. · Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1990 · 59 · 443
2. Birgisson B · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Pavement Technologists · 2007 · 76 · 303
3. Birgisson, B., Roque, R., Varadhan, A., Thai, T. & Jaiswal, L. (2006). Evaluation of thick open graded and bonded friction courses for Florida. Final Report of Florida Department of Transportation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL.
4. Buchanan, M.S. & Woods, M.E. (2004). Field tack coat evaluator (ATACKer™). Report No. FHWA/MS-DOT-RD-04-168. Mississippi Department of Transportation, Jackson, MS.
5. 10.1080/1029843050006872010.1080/10298430500068720 ↗
6. Chen Y. · 2011
7. Collop A. C. · Construction and Building Materials · 2009 · 23 · 225110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.11.017 ↗
8. Diakhate M. · Construction and Building Materials · 2011 · 25 · 112310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.064 ↗
9. FDOT · 2007
10. Koh C. · 2009
11. Hu X. · Journal of Transportation Engineering · 2010 · 137 · 2810.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000184 ↗
12. Jones R. M. · 1980
13. Mohammad L. N. · Transportation Research Record · 2002 · 1789 · 5610.3141/1789-06 ↗
14. Roque R. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2004 · 73 · 229
15. Shahin M. Y. · Transportation Research Record · 1986 · 1095 · 79
16. Sholar, G.A., Page, G.C., Musselman, J.A., Upshaw, P.B. & Moseley, H.L. (2002). Preliminary investigation of a test method to evaluate bond strength of bituminous tack coats. Research Report FL/DOT/SMO/02-459. Gainesville, FL: Florida Department of Transportation.
17. Ziari H. · Journal of Civil Engineering and Management · 2007 · 13 · 7110.3846/13923730.2007.9636421 ↗
18. Zhang Z. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2001 · 70 · 206