journal article·2025-11-15

Asphalt concrete overlay thermal reflective cracking stress intensity factor prediction using machine learning

Fangyu Liu, Imad L. Al-Qadi, Masih Beheshti, Hasan Ozer

Publisher page

Abstract

This work proposed an machine learning (ML)-based framework to predict stress intensity factor (SIF) in reflective cracking of asphalt concrete (AC) overlay under thermal loading, to predict overlay fatigue life. A database from 8750 simulations of 3D finite element pavement models was established to predict SIF. Considering the linear relationship between crack opening and SIF, two conditions were explored to predict SIF: (i) Crack opening was included in input variables along with AC layer thickness and modulus, Portland cement concrete (PCC) modulus, and crack propagation; and (ii) crack opening was excluded from input variables, maintaining other variables. Artificial Neural Network (ANN) outperformed other ML models in both conditions. The optimal input variables for SIF prediction should include AC layer thickness, AC modulus, PCC modulus, and crack propagation. In conclusion, ANN could be an accurate and robust method for predicting SIF in reflective cracking of asphalt overlay subjected to thermal loading.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete Properties and Behavior · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign

Arizona State University

Funding

Federal Aviation Administration

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Ahmed M. Arefin M. & Yin H. (2020). Reflective cracking outdoor phase I comprehensive report.
2. Al-Qadi I. Ramakrishnan A. Zhu Z. Said I. Renshaw G. Ozer H. & Salim R. (2023). Optimized Hot-Mix Asphalt Lift Configuration for Performance. FHWA-ICT-23-005. https://doi.org/10.36501/0197-9191/23-00610.36501/0197-9191/23-006 ↗
3. ASTM International. (2023). Standard practice for roads and parking lots pavement condition index surveys.
4. Beheshti M. & Ozer H.. (2025). Viscoelastic computational fracture mechanics approach for the analysis of thermal reflective cracking in asphalt overlaid jointed concrete airfield pavements. Transportation Research Record 03611981251355528. https://doi.org/10.1177/03611981251355528.10.1177/03611981251355528 ↗
5. 10.1080/10298436.2024.234629110.1080/10298436.2024.2346291 ↗
6. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S10.1002/(SICI)1097-0207(19990620)45:5<601::AID-NME598>3.0.CO;2-S ↗
7. 10.1023/A:101093340432410.1023/A:1010933404324 ↗
8. Chen T. & Guestrin C. (2016). XGBoost: A scalable tree boosting system. Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.293978510.1145/2939672.2939785 ↗
9. 10.1007/BF0099401810.1007/BF00994018 ↗
10. 10.1080/1029843090357891110.1080/10298430903578911 ↗
11. 10.1007/s42947-020-0332-510.1007/s42947-020-0332-5 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2023.10375910.1016/j.tafmec.2023.103759 ↗
13. Huang, Y. H. (2004). Pavement analysis and design. Pearson Prentice Hall.
14. 10.3141/2631-1010.3141/2631-10 ↗
15. 10.1080/10298436.2025.246420110.1080/10298436.2025.2464201 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.engappai.2025.11239110.1016/j.engappai.2025.112391 ↗
17. 10.1080/14680629.2024.235679610.1080/14680629.2024.2356796 ↗
18. 10.1109/TITS.2022.314239310.1109/TITS.2022.3142393 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10457510.1016/j.autcon.2022.104575 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10438310.1016/j.autcon.2022.104383 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jtte.2023.10.00210.1016/j.jtte.2023.10.002 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.autcon.2024.10535510.1016/j.autcon.2024.105355 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13361010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.133610 ↗
24. 10.1038/s42256-019-0138-910.1038/s42256-019-0138-9 ↗
25. Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2017/hash/8a20a8621978632d76c43dfd28b67767-Abstract.html
26. 10.1038/s41551-018-0304-010.1038/s41551-018-0304-0 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11851310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118513 ↗
28. NCHRP 1-37A. (2007). Mechanistic empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures.
29. 10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00039-X10.1016/S0045-7825(97)00039-X ↗
30. Ozer H. (2011). Development of domain integral and generalized finite element methods for three dimensional analysis of near-surface cracking in flexible pavements. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://search.proquest.com/openview/378717c82180a616b1cd69468237b1e9/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&casa_token=FEjBOr6OrvYAAAAA:TB8d9-8iO6CW03xCTgP4cqhjNPtmikG1MDRmoGbOY9Vwo9FZ9O7etVVHdfw127L54NWwSpai
31. Paszke A. Gross S. Massa F. Lerer A. Bradbury J. Chanan G. Killeen T. Lin Z. Gimelshein N. Antiga L. Desmaison A. Köpf A. Yang E. DeVito Z. Raison M. Tejani A. Chilamkurthy S. Steiner B. Fang L. … Chintala S. (2019). PyTorch: An imperative style high-performance deep learning library. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (pp. 8026–8037). Curran Associates Inc.
32. Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., Blondel, M., Prettenhofer, P., Weiss, R., Dubourg, V., Vanderplas, J., Passos, A., Cournapeau, D., Brucher, M., Perrot, M., & Duchesnay, É. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12(85), 2825–2830.
33. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.12.01010.1016/j.engfailanal.2006.12.010 ↗
34. 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.110.1175/JCLI-D-11-00015.1 ↗
35. Tietz M. Fan T. Nouri D. Bossan B. & Skorch Developers. (2017). skorch: A scikit-learn compatible neural network library that wraps PyTorch. https://skorch.readthedocs.io/en/stable/
36. 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.06310.1016/j.eswa.2013.07.063 ↗
37. 10.3141/2368-0810.3141/2368-08 ↗
38. 10.17226/1441010.17226/14410 ↗