Addressing uncertainty in pavement performance prediction: a quasi-Monte Carlo simulation-based reliability approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Predicting the long-term performance of pavement structures is crucial for efficient infrastructure management, but uncertainties in material properties, traffic loads, and environmental conditions pose significant challenges. This research introduces a novel reliability model for pavement performance prediction using Quasi-Monte Carlo (QMC) simulation. Unlike traditional Monte Carlo methods, QMC employs deterministic sequences for enhanced sampling efficiency and accuracy in estimating probabilistic quantities like reliability indices and probabilities of failure. The study investigates the impact of QMC on pavement performance predictions, considering uncertainties in traffic load repetitions, fatigue life, and rutting life. The QMC approach demonstrates superior performance by producing stable mean estimates and significantly narrowing confidence intervals as sample size increases. This research highlights the advantages of QMC simulation in probabilistic pavement design, offering a computationally efficient framework for robust and reliable performance predictions. The findings support QMC as a valuable tool for achieving durable, safe, and cost-effective pavement infrastructure.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Madanapalle Institute of Technology and Science
Department of Mathematics, Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, Madanapalle, India
Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering
Lovely Professional University
Chitkara University
King Saud University
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/14680629.2019.159322910.1080/14680629.2019.1593229 ↗
2. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1988)114:3(294)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1988)114:3(294) ↗
3. 10.1061/JPEODX.000015010.1061/JPEODX.0000150 ↗
4. Congress I. R. (2001). Guidelines for the design of flexible pavements. Indian Code of Practice IRC 37. https://nepalindata.com/media/resources/bulk_file/GUIDELINES%20FOR%20THE%20DESIGN%20OF%20FLEXIBLE%20PAVEMENTS%20%28Fourth%20Revision%29%2C%202018.pdf.
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000057810.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000578 ↗
6. 10.1080/1029843060061905910.1080/10298430600619059 ↗
7. 10.1515/156939605449513010.1515/1569396054495130 ↗
8. 10.1080/23249935.2018.143373010.1080/23249935.2018.1433730 ↗
9. Huang, Y. H. (2004). Pavement analysis and design (Vol. 2, pp. 401–409). Pearson/Prentice Hall.
10. 10.1080/14680629.2003.968994810.1080/14680629.2003.9689948 ↗
11. 10.3141/2151-1110.3141/2151-11 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000024410.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000244 ↗
13. 10.1080/14680629.2014.98817110.1080/14680629.2014.988171 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.23610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.236 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000037910.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000379 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.trd.2013.10.00210.1016/j.trd.2013.10.002 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ress.2021.10752010.1016/j.ress.2021.107520 ↗
18. 10.1177/036119810619450010710.1177/0361198106194500107 ↗
19. 10.3141/2154-1310.3141/2154-13 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.watres.2021.11695310.1016/j.watres.2021.116953 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.000121110.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001211 ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000033410.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000334 ↗
23. Vásquez-Varela, L. R., & García-Orozco, F. J. (2021). An overview of asphalt pavement design for streets and roads. Revista Facultad de Ingeniería Universidad de Antioquia, 98, 10–26.
24. Visintine B. A. Hicks R. G. Cheng D. & Elkins G. E. (2015). Factors affecting the performance of pavement preservation treatments. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/items/e47b3454-bc7a-44e1-9f7d-15f7ef8bb474.
25. 10.1080/14680629.2010.969027710.1080/14680629.2010.9690277 ↗
26. 10.1155/2020/882413510.1155/2020/8824135 ↗