Desulphurisation ash recycling in soil modification for roadbed materials: a case study
Source abstract
Abstract
A large amount of desulphurisation ash (DA) lacks effective utilisation, resulting in land occupation and environmental pollution. This study investigates DA as a lime substitute for subgrade soil modification. Laboratory tests (Atterberg limits, compaction, CBR, UCS, SEM-EDS) were conducted with 2–8% DA content, followed by a pilot project to compare the performance of DA- and lime-treated roadbeds. The results show DA reduces soil plasticity, increases optimal moisture content and decreases maximum dry density. CBR increases by 135% (8% DA) and UCS improves by 167% (6% DA, 7 days curing). Field tests confirm comparable performance between DA- and lime-treated sections. Mechanistically, DA modifies soil via cation exchange, pozzolanic reactions and hydration, forming AFt and AFm, enhancing micro–macro integrity. Excessive DA (>6%) risks expansion and performance loss. DA recycling as a soil modifier in roadbed applications can effectively save engineering costs and reduce CO2 emissions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Recycling and utilization of industrial and municipal waste in materials production · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Southeast University
Jiangsu Construction Bureau of Transportation Engineering
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key R&D Program of China
References (29)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/s0169-1317(96)00023-310.1016/s0169-1317(96)00023-3 ↗
2. ASTM-D1557. (2012). Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort. West Conshohocken PA USA.
3. ASTM-D1883. (2021). Standard test method for California Bearing Ratio (CBR) of laboratory-compacted soils. West Conshohocken PA USA.
4. ASTM-D2166M. (2016). Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of cohesive soil. West Conshohocken PA USA.
5. ASTM-D2487. (2017). Standard practice for classification of soils for engineering purposes (unified soil classification system). West Conshohocken PA USA.
6. 10.1080/14680629.2017.131422210.1080/14680629.2017.1314222 ↗
7. 10.3390/su909158510.3390/su9091585 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2022.10084610.1016/j.trgeo.2022.100846 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13230410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132304 ↗
10. 10.1080/10298436.2017.133711910.1080/10298436.2017.1337119 ↗
11. GB-18599. (2020). Standard for pollution control on the non-hazardous industrial solid waste storage and landfill. State Environmental Protection Administration.
12. 10.1109/ICEET.2009.11310.1109/ICEET.2009.113 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13641110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136411 ↗
14. JTG-D30. (2015). Specifications for design of highway subgrades. Ministry of Transport of the people's Republic of China. Beijing China.
15. JTG/TF20. (2015). Technical guidelines for construction of highway roadbases. Ministry of Transport of the people's Republic of China. Beijing China.
16. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102897010.1080/14680629.2015.1028970 ↗
17. 10.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.000055210.1061/(asce)gm.1943-5622.0000552 ↗
18. 10.1520/gtj2022029410.1520/gtj20220294 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.01.00610.1016/j.cemconres.2006.01.006 ↗
20. 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1979.tb01004.x10.1111/j.1365-2389.1979.tb01004.x ↗
21. 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.11984910.1016/j.seppur.2021.119849 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10706-017-0294-910.1007/s10706-017-0294-9 ↗
23. 10.1139/cgj-37-2-39310.1139/cgj-37-2-393 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.wasman.2005.02.02010.1016/j.wasman.2005.02.020 ↗
25. 10.1016/s0013-7952(97)00022-710.1016/s0013-7952(97)00022-7 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.rser.2022.11276510.1016/j.rser.2022.112765 ↗
27. 10.3390/ijerph1603050010.3390/ijerph16030500 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12157110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121571 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.10.00210.1016/j.jrmge.2021.10.002 ↗