journal article·2025-05-20

Statistical modelling of pavement friction: analyzing the effects of texture characteristics and measurement resolution

Pawel Gierasimiuk, Malal Kane

Road Materials and Pavement Design· Volume 26· Issue sup1
Publisher page

Abstract

This study aims to develop robust predictive models for the friction coefficient (μFAP) by examining the influence of pavement texture characteristics, measurement resolution, and sample treatment histories. Road pavement samples were subjected to varying treatments, including natural weathering and controlled polishing using a Friction After Polishing (FAP) device, to simulate traffic effects.The analysis demonstrates that higher texture measurement resolutions significantly enhance the predictive accuracy of μFAP, with models using parameters from 200 µm, 500 µm, and 1000 µm resolutions explaining 80-90% of the variability in friction coefficients. In contrast, models based on lower resolutions of 10 µm and 100 µm performed less effectively. Additionally, consistent treatment of samples led to more reliable predictions, highlighting the importance of uniform sample conditions in friction coefficient estimation. These findings underscore the potential of non-contact measurement techniques for real-world applications in assessing road safety.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Transport Systems and Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Bialystok University of Technology

Université Gustave Eiffel, Campus de Nantes

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.24200/tjer.vol3iss1pp75-7810.24200/tjer.vol3iss1pp75-78 ↗
2. 10.1177/036119811877416510.1177/0361198118774165 ↗
3. 10.3390/infrastructures502001810.3390/infrastructures5020018 ↗
4. 10.1080/14680629.2018.156035410.1080/14680629.2018.1560354 ↗
5. 10.3390/app1001003210.3390/app10010032 ↗
6. 10.17265/2328-2142/2014.06.00410.17265/2328-2142/2014.06.004 ↗
7. EN 12697-49. Bituminous mixtures - Test methods - Part 49: Determination of friction after polishing.
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:4(311)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2005)131:4(311) ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jreng.2021.12.00110.1016/j.jreng.2021.12.001 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.wear.2013.12.02810.1016/j.wear.2013.12.028 ↗
11. Hofko, B., Kugler, H., Chankov, G., & Spielhofer, R. (2017). Correlating field and Lab measurements of skid resistance by skiddometer and wehner-schulze device. TRB 96th annual meeting compendium of papers, 1–12.
12. ISO 21920-2:2021. Geometrical product specifications (GPS) — Surface texture: Profile Part 2: Terms definitions and surface texture parameters.
13. 10.1016/j.wear.2013.03.02210.1016/j.wear.2013.03.022 ↗
14. 10.3390/engproc202303602310.3390/engproc2023036023 ↗
15. 10.3390/coatings1110118010.3390/coatings11101180 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e0212610.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02126 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.triboint.2024.10973710.1016/j.triboint.2024.109737 ↗
18. 10.3390/app1309573610.3390/app13095736 ↗
19. 10.1007/s40544-023-0811-110.1007/s40544-023-0811-1 ↗
20. 10.4236/ojce.2016.6404610.4236/ojce.2016.64046 ↗
21. 10.1051/e3sconf/20223470101710.1051/e3sconf/202234701017 ↗
22. 10.1080/10298436.2021.192437710.1080/10298436.2021.1924377 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12004110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120041 ↗
24. 10.1007/978-3-030-48679-2_8610.1007/978-3-030-48679-2_86 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13056710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130567 ↗
26. Sanders P. D. & Browne C. (2020). Characterising the measurements made by sideways-force skid resistance devices. A desk study and proposal for an experimental study. Published Project Report PPR957 TRL 50.
27. 10.3390/coatings1102018710.3390/coatings11020187 ↗
28. Wallman, C.-G., & Åström, H. (2001). Friction measurement methods and the correlation between road friction and traffic safety. A literature review. VTI Development AB, 47.
29. 10.1186/s10033-021-00675-z10.1186/s10033-021-00675-z ↗
30. 10.1088/1757-899X/356/1/01200110.1088/1757-899X/356/1/012001 ↗
31. 10.1080/10298436.2022.213887710.1080/10298436.2022.2138877 ↗
32. 10.1080/10298436.2022.216045110.1080/10298436.2022.2160451 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijtst.2023.04.00110.1016/j.ijtst.2023.04.001 ↗
34. 10.1177/036119811882159810.1177/0361198118821598 ↗