Asphalt emissions in paving production, transportation, placement and in-service temperature conditions
Source abstract
Abstract
The paving industry significantly contributes to elevated air pollutant emissions. This study analyses asphalt emissions during asphalt mixing plant (AMP) production, transport and placement in a real context of paving services and after compaction and cooling under operational conditions, which remains an underexplored aspect in scientific literature. Particulate matter (PM) with chemical speciation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was collected in AMP by HiVol. Innovative passive sampling methods were used for NO2 in field measurements, while, in the laboratory, air quality sensors collected NO2 and VOCs. NO2 results suggest that transport is the critical paving service, at least five times higher than production. Asphalt pavements exposed to daily heat cycles (∼65°C) are a continuous source of air pollution emissions in urban areas, showing the same concentration magnitudes of paving steps. This study can contribute to emission inventories, aiding the comprehension and depiction of factors that impact urban air quality.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Smart Materials for Construction · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Federal University of Ceará
Funding
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · Fundação Cearense de Apoio ao Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico · FUNCAP
References (46)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.12428910.1016/j.fuel.2022.124289 ↗
2. 10.58922/transportes.v31i3.288710.58922/transportes.v31i3.2887 ↗
3. 10.3390/su1209387010.3390/su12093870 ↗
4. 10.1007/s13181-011-0203-110.1007/s13181-011-0203-1 ↗
5. 10.1186/s40064-016-3553-y10.1186/s40064-016-3553-y ↗
6. 10.1016/j.uclim.2021.10095010.1016/j.uclim.2021.100950 ↗
7. 10.1021/es505316f10.1021/es505316f ↗
8. 10.1016/B978-0-12-814719-1.00017-310.1016/B978-0-12-814719-1.00017-3 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.microc.2010.02.01510.1016/j.microc.2010.02.015 ↗
10. 10.3390/su1310564210.3390/su13105642 ↗
11. 10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<0143:NPIL>2.0.CO;210.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<0143:NPIL>2.0.CO;2 ↗
12. 10.1097/maj.0b013e31803b900f10.1097/maj.0b013e31803b900f ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12212810.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122128 ↗
14. 10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.000145410.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001454 ↗
15. 10.1007/s10874-020-09401-w10.1007/s10874-020-09401-w ↗
16. 10.1016/s1352-2310(00)00551-310.1016/s1352-2310(00)00551-3 ↗
17. Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente. (2018). Resolução n° 491 de 19 de novembro de 2018: Dispõe Sobre Padrões de Qualidade Do Ar.
18. Ecotech Environmental Monitoring solutions. (2020). HiVol 3000 High volume air sampler: User manual 1.8.
19. Faccin, C., Lisboa, S., Pedro, S., Borges, A. O., Pablo, J., Vestena, M., Pivoto, L., Lucas, S., Bueno, D., Figueiredo, L., & Leite, M. (2021, November). Mapas de Grau de Desempenho (Pg) de Ligantes Asfálticos para o Brasil. 35o congresso de Pesquisa e Ensino Em Transportes.
20. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.13684910.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136849 ↗
21. 10.14295/transportes.v26i2.144710.14295/transportes.v26i2.1447 ↗
22. 10.1080/1542811020898469910.1080/15428110208984699 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.11601110.1016/j.envpol.2020.116011 ↗
24. 10.1080/10406638.2014.89288610.1080/10406638.2014.892886 ↗
25. 10.1126/sciadv.abb978510.1126/sciadv.abb9785 ↗
26. 10.2139/ssrn.421955110.2139/ssrn.4219551 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.uclim.2023.10145710.1016/j.uclim.2023.101457 ↗
28. 10.3389/fpubh.2020.0001410.3389/fpubh.2020.00014 ↗
29. 10.1130/g20679.110.1130/g20679.1 ↗
30. Motta, R. S. (2011). Estudo de misturas asfálticas mornas em revestimentos de pavimentos para redução de emissão de poluentes e de consumo energético (Tese (Doutorado). São Paulo: Universidade de São Paulo. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/3/3138/tde-19072011-170629/
31. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.13604810.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.136048 ↗
32. 10.1016/s1465-9972(00)00013-110.1016/s1465-9972(00)00013-1 ↗
33. 10.3390/environments606007310.3390/environments6060073 ↗
34. Quirit L. L. Llaguno E. C. Pabroa P. C. B. Bello F. B. B. & Gonzales B. P. (2002). Comparison of methods for ambient air sulfur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide. Null.
35. 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.12.01010.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.12.010 ↗
36. 10.14295/transportes.v27i2.172810.14295/transportes.v27i2.1728 ↗
37. 10.1007/s11356-021-16697-y10.1007/s11356-021-16697-y ↗
38. 10.1021/ac60096a02510.1021/ac60096a025 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.rser.2021.11155210.1016/j.rser.2021.111552 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.scs.2018.08.00910.1016/j.scs.2018.08.009 ↗
41. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (1973). Atmospheric emissions from the asphalt industry (EPA 650/2-73-046).
42. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2000). Hot mix asphalt plants emission assessment report (EPA 454/R-00-019).
43. United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2003). National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants: Asphalt Processing and Asphalt Roofing Manufacturing; Final Rule. 68(Federal Register: Part II) 24562–24593.
44. Vallero, D. (2014). Fundamentals of air pollution (5th ed.). Academic Press.
45. 10.1023/a:102488362040810.1023/a:1024883620408 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.trd.2020.10251710.1016/j.trd.2020.102517 ↗