The effect of laboratory compaction method on the resilient behaviour and fabric of aggregate base course materials
Source abstract
Abstract
Aggregate base course (ABC) layer is a key structural component of most pavements. The compaction of ABC is a crucial procedure affecting its mechanical performance. There are two different methods commonly used in the lab to compact ABC specimens: impact and vibratory. Past studies have demonstrated that the compaction method can affect the resilient deformation behaviour of ABC. However, the reasons for these differences in terms of the constituent ABC particle properties and the resultant compacted aggregate fabric remains unclear. This study evaluates the influence of the laboratory compaction method on the resilient behaviour and fabric of two ABC materials with differing mineralogies. Resilient modulus tests performed on the specimens compacted with the two methods result in different behaviours. A series of subsequent laboratory tests were performed to explain the observed resilient behaviour by assessing changes in aggregate morphology and fabric. The study presented herein incorporates digital imaging analyses using a novel specimen preparation technique. The results demonstrate that impact compaction can degrade ABC materials that are susceptible to crushing. This, in turn, increases the resilient modulus of the ABC by increasing the number of contact points between particles. It is recommended that the compaction method used in the laboratory match the compaction processes in the field as best as possible to obtain the most representative resilient modulus test results.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Funding
North Carolina Department of Transportation
References (23)
Show source-provided references
1. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (1999). Determining the resilient modulus of soils and aggregate materials (AASHTO T 307).
2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (1999). Standard method of test for moisture-density relations of soils using a 2.5-kg (5.5-lb) rammer and a 305-mm (12-in.) drop (AASHTO T 180).
3. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2006). Standard test method for resistance to degradation of small-size coarse aggregate by abrasion and impact in the Los Angeles machine (ASTM C 131).
4. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2011). Standard test methods for chemical analysis of limestone, quicklime, and hydrated lime (ASTM C 25).
5. American Society for Testing and Materials. (2015). Standard test method for relative density (specific gravity) and absorption of coarse aggregate (ASTM C 127).
6. Bozorgi, A. (2018). Understanding the role of morphology, mineralogy, and fabric on the resilient behavior of aggregate base course (PhD dissertation). North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA (158 pp.).
7. 10.1080/14680629.2013.86950510.1080/14680629.2013.869505 ↗
8. Drnevich, V. P., Evans, A. C. & Prochaska, A. B. (2007). A study of effective soil compaction control of granular soils (Rep. No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2007/12), Perdue University.10.5703/1288284313357 ↗
9. Evans T. M. · 2005
10. Frost, J. D. (1989). Studies on the monotonic and cyclic behavior of sands (Doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
11. Gates, L., Masad, E., Pyle, R. & Bushee, D. (2011). Aggregate imaging measurement system 2 (AIMS2) (Final Report: FHWA-HIF-11-030).
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000114710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001147 ↗
13. 10.1080/14680629.2011.969035510.1080/14680629.2011.9690355 ↗
14. Hoff, I., Bakokk, L. J. & Aurstad, J. (2004). Influence of laboratory compaction method on unbound granular materials. Proceedings for the 6th international symposium on Pavements Unbound (UNBAR 6), 6–8.
15. 10.1520/GTJ10205J10.1520/GTJ10205J ↗
16. 10.1680/geot.52.5.313.3870910.1680/geot.52.5.313.38709 ↗
17. Mahmood, A., Mitchell, J. K. & Lindblom, U. (1976). Effect of specimen preparation method on grain arrangement and compressibility in sand (Soil Specimen Preparation for Laboratory Testing, ASTM STP 599, pp. 169–192). West Conshohocken, PA: American Society for Testing and Materials.10.1520/STP39082S ↗
18. Mahmoud, E., Kutay, E. & Bahia, H. (2010). Image Processing & Analysis System (iPas). Standard method for determining aggregate structure in asphalt mixes by means of planar imaging-Draft procedure. Retrieved from http://uwmarc.wisc.edu/ipas-software-package
19. Mitchell J. K. · 2005
20. 10.3208/sandf1960.12.1710.3208/sandf1960.12.17 ↗
21. Shahin A. W. · 2010
22. 10.1080/10298436.2013.85777210.1080/10298436.2013.857772 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.06.00610.1016/j.compgeo.2011.06.006 ↗