journal article·2025-04-03

Identification of compositional heterogeneity and influence of chemical fractions on surface microstructures through bitumen optical microscopy

Nazmus Sakib, Amit Bhasin

Publisher page

Abstract

Bitumen is the residua of fractional distillation of crude oil. It generally consists of complex and a diverse variety of organic molecules and other hetero-atoms. The nature and interactions between these molecules dictate the engineering properties of the bitumen. One of the attributes that is used to classify and examine these diverse constituent molecules is based on their relative polarities. In parallel, significant research has been conducted on bitumen surface microstructure, commonly referred as ‘bee structure’. Typically a bitumen is classified into four polarity based chemical fractions, namely saturates, aromatics, resins and asphaltenes (SARA) using physical separation by precipitation and chromatography. Such separations generally require specialised equipment and expertise. In this study, a fast and repeatable technique of chromatography using disposable and inexpensive parts were developed, named ‘SiSara’. This method was then used to fractionate a large set of bitumens in order to compare the constitution of the bitumens based on these fractions to their microstructural properties. Microscopic observation of surface microstructures indicates similarity among bitumens from the same producer. There was also a good correlation between SARA parameters and surface microstructure for bitumens from the same producer. However, this relationship was unique for each producer and not global suggesting that other factors related to the crude source need to be considered as well.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Petroleum Processing and Analysis · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Islamic University of Technology (IUT)

The University of Texas at Austin

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000051010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000510 ↗
2. 10.1080/10298436.2013.83619210.1080/10298436.2013.836192 ↗
3. ASTM D2007 (2016). Standard test method for characteristic groups in rubber extender and processing oils by Clay-Gel adsorption chromatography method. ASTM International.
4. ASTM D3279 (1997). Standard test method for n-Heptane insolubles. ASTM International.
5. ASTM D4124 (2009). Standard test methods for separation of Asphalt into four fractions. ASTM International.
6. ASTM D6560 (2012). Standard test method for determination of asphaltenes (Heptane Insolubles) in crude petroleum and petroleum products. ASTM International.
7. Baumgardner G. L. (2012). Why and how of polyphosphoric acid modification (Tech. Rep.). Transportation Research Circular E-C160 Transportation Research Board.
8. Bhasin, A., & Ganesan, V. (2015). Preliminary investigation of using a multi-component phase field model to evaluate microstructure of asphalt binders. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 18(9), 1–8.
9. 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.12126510.1016/j.fuel.2021.121265 ↗
10. Claudy, P., Letoffe, J., King, G., & Plancke, J. (1992). Characterization of asphalts cements by thermomicroscopy and differential scanning calorimetry: Correlation to classic physical properties. Journal of Microscopy, 10(4-6), 735–765.
11. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77474410.1080/14680629.2013.774744 ↗
12. 10.3141/2632-0510.3141/2632-05 ↗
13. 10.1080/10298436.2019.165274210.1080/10298436.2019.1652742 ↗
14. 10.1617/s11527-015-0541-610.1617/s11527-015-0541-6 ↗
15. Hure, R. (2017). Beyond the PG specification for asphalt binders. The University of Texas at Austin.
16. 10.1016/S0950-0618(97)00008-110.1016/S0950-0618(97)00008-1 ↗
17. 10.1080/10298436.2014.94286310.1080/10298436.2014.942863 ↗
18. 10.1046/j.1365-2818.1996.134416.x10.1046/j.1365-2818.1996.134416.x ↗
19. 10.1007/s10853-013-7505-410.1007/s10853-013-7505-4 ↗
20. 10.1111/jmi.2006.221.issue-110.1111/jmi.2006.221.issue-1 ↗
21. 10.1111/jmi.2016.262.issue-110.1111/jmi.2016.262.issue-1 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.micron.2022.10329410.1016/j.micron.2022.103294 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13271010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132710 ↗
24. Nahar S. (2016). Phase-separation characteristics of bitumen and their relation to damage-healing [Doctoral dissertation Delft University of Technology].
25. 10.1080/1091646980894982710.1080/10916469808949827 ↗
26. Pauli, A., Branthaver, J., Robertson, R., Grimes, W., & Eggleston, C. (2001). Atomic force microscopy investigation of shrp asphalts: Heavy oil and resid compatibility and stability. Preprints-American Chemical Society. Division of Petroleum Chemistry, 46(2), 104–110.
27. 10.1080/10298436.2011.57594210.1080/10298436.2011.575942 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.micron.2021.10308310.1016/j.micron.2021.103083 ↗
29. 10.1111/jmi.v276.310.1111/jmi.v276.3 ↗
30. 10.1111/jmi.2016.262.issue-310.1111/jmi.2016.262.issue-3 ↗
31. 10.1111/jmi.2018.271.issue-310.1111/jmi.2018.271.issue-3 ↗
32. 10.1021/ef040005810.1021/ef0400058 ↗
33. Sakib N. (2018). Towards a better understanding of bitumen chemistry microstructure and rheology [Doctoral dissertation The University of Texas at Austin].
34. Sakib, N., & Bhasin, A (2018). Measuring polarity-based distributions (sara) of bitumen using simplified chromatographic techniques. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 20, 1–14.
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000319710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003197 ↗
36. 10.1080/10298436.2010.48873010.1080/10298436.2010.488730 ↗
37. 10.1617/s11527-013-0123-410.1617/s11527-013-0123-4 ↗
38. Stangl K. (2010). Linking chemical and physical characteristics with mechanical performance of bitumen [Doctoral dissertation Vienna University of Technology].
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.02210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.09.022 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.004 ↗
41. 10.1080/14680629.2017.133818910.1080/14680629.2017.1338189 ↗