Moisture susceptibility of HMA containing high siliceous quartzite aggregates: a comparative study of different hydrated lime addition methods
Source abstract
Abstract
Hydrated lime (HL) has been used in asphalt mixtures to enhance the resistance to moisture damage in three ways, viz, as a filler, bitumen additive, and coating to aggregates. Quartzite aggregates are weaker in adhesion to asphalt binder due to higher silica content in chemical composition. This study compared three HL addition mechanisms to improve moisture-induced damage in hot mix asphalt made with high siliceous quartzite aggregates. Extensive experimental investigations were carried out, such as indirect tensile strength (ITS), tensile strength ratio (TSR), and fracture energy (FE), to compare the effects of HL addition with respect to conventional mixes. The ITS and TSR results found that HL-additive and HL-coating methods improved the resistance to moisture damage. Compared to control mixtures, HL-treated mixtures showed 20–25 percent higher TSR values. Meanwhile, the HL-filler method showed better resistance to fracture than the other two methods, offering better resistance to fracture in the field.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Masonry and Concrete Structural Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Indian Institute of Technology Jammu
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur
Funding
National Highways Authority of India
References (61)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO T 100. (2006). Standard method of test for specific gravity of soils. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
2. AASHTO T 283. (2014). Standard method of test for resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture-induced damage. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.
3. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000147410.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001474 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12075710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120757 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.03010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.030 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.11310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.12.113 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.005 ↗
8. Asphalt Institute Manual MS-2. (2014). Asphalt Mix Design Methods. Asphalt Institute.
9. ASTM D 1074-17. (2017). Standard test method for compressive strength of asphalt mixtures. https://www.astm.org/
10. ASTM D1075-11. (2011). Standard test method for effect of water on compressive strength of compacted bituminous mixtures. https://www.astm.org/
11. 10.1007/s11527-005-9040-510.1007/s11527-005-9040-5 ↗
12. BIS 1202. (1978). Methods for testing tar and bituminous materials: Determination of specific gravity.
13. BIS 1203. (1978). Methods of testing tar and bituminous materials: Determination of penetration.
14. BIS 1205. (1978). Methods for testing tar and bituminous materials: Determination of softening point.
15. BIS 1206. (1978). Methods for testing tar and bituminous materials: Determination of viscosity Part – 2.
16. BIS 1208. (1978). Methods for testing tar and bituminous materials: Determination of ductility.
17. BIS 1212. (1978). Methods for testing tar and bituminous materials: Determination of loss on heating.
18. BIS 1448. (1969). Methods of test for petroleum and its products: Flash and fire point by cleaveland (open) cup.
19. BIS 2386. (1963a). Methods of test for aggregates for concrete Part 1: Particle size and shape. public.resource.Org
20. BIS 2386. (1963b). Methods of test for aggregates for concrete Part 3: Specific gravity density voids absorption and bulking. public.resource.org
21. BIS 2386. (1963c). Methods of test for aggregates for concrete Part 4: Mechanical properties. public.resource.org
22. BIS 6241. (1971). Method of test for determination of stripping value of road aggregates. public.resource.org
23. BIS 73. (2013). Paving bitumen – Specification. public.resources.org
24. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0055110.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00551 ↗
25. 10.3141/2057-0410.3141/2057-04 ↗
26. 10.3403/BSEN1310810.3403/BSEN13108 ↗
27. Epps, J. A., Sebaaly, P. E., Penaranda, J., Maher, M. R., Mccann, M. B., & Hand, A. J. (2000). Compatibility of a test for moisture-induced damage with superpave volumetric Mix design (NCHRP Report 444). National Academy Press. Transportation Research Board. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_rpt_444.pdf
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12902210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129022 ↗
29. 10.1016/B978-0-12-408133-8.00001-810.1016/B978-0-12-408133-8.00001-8 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:6(711)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:6(711) ↗
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000006410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000064 ↗
32. IRC 111. (2009). Specifications for dense graded bituminous mixes. www.irc.nic.in
33. Islam, R., & Tarefder, R. A. (2014). Tensile Strength of Asphalt Concrete due to Moisture Conditioning, 8(9), 951–954.
34. 10.1080/14680629.2016.122419810.1080/14680629.2016.1224198 ↗
35. 10.3141/2057-0810.3141/2057-08 ↗
36. Khosla N. P. & Harvey N. (2009). Evaluation of indirect tensile strength as design criteria for superpave mixtures final report FHWA/NC/2008-02. (Issue July). https://connect.ncdot.gov/projects/research/RNAProjDocs/2008-02FinalReport.pdf
37. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:10(659)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:10(659) ↗
38. 10.1080/14680629.2018.147328110.1080/14680629.2018.1473281 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000030610.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000306 ↗
40. 10.1080/14680629.2012.74366910.1080/14680629.2012.743669 ↗
41. Little, D. N., & Epps, J. A. (2001). The benefits of hydrated lime in HMA. National Lime Association (LIME).
42. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:2(207)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:2(207) ↗
43. Lottman, R. P. (1982). Laboratory test methods for predicting moisture-induced damage to asphalt concrete. Transportation Research Record, no. 843, 88–95.
44. 10.3141/2051-0710.3141/2051-07 ↗
45. MORTH. (2013). Specifications for road and bridge works. www.morth.nic.in
46. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.04210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.042 ↗
47. 10.1080/14680629.2020.180852210.1080/14680629.2020.1808522 ↗
48. 10.1080/14680629.2018.147529710.1080/14680629.2018.1475297 ↗
49. Saha, A., Singh, B., & Biswas, S. (2017). Effect of nano-materials on asphalt concrete mixes, a case study. European Transport\Trasporti Europei, no. 65, 1–12.
50. 10.1016/j.jtte.2022.03.00110.1016/j.jtte.2022.03.001 ↗
51. 10.1080/10298436.2023.225957510.1080/10298436.2023.2259575 ↗
52. Sebaaly, P. E., Little, D. N., & Epps, J. A. (2006). The benefits of hydrated lime in hot mix asphalt. National Lime Association (LIME).
53. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.03110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.031 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.08410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.084 ↗
55. 10.1080/14680629.2021.197625410.1080/14680629.2021.1976254 ↗
56. 10.17226/2315310.17226/23153 ↗
57. Solaimanian, M., & Kennedy, T. W. (2000). Precision of the moisture susceptibility test method Tex-531-C: Research Report. Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas at Austin. http://www.utexas.edu/research/ctr/pdf_reports/4909_1.pdf
58. 10.1080/14680629.2015.101752010.1080/14680629.2015.1017520 ↗
59. 10.3141/2575-0810.3141/2575-08 ↗
60. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000332110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003321 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.01910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.019 ↗