Investigating the effects of ageing condition and type of aggregates on the properties of asphalt mixtures
Source abstract
Abstract
In this study, asphalt mixtures made by steel slag (SSA), copper slag (CSA), limestone (LA) and siliceous (SA) aggregates were subjected to different aging conditions; and were evaluated using Marshall, indirect tensile strength (ITS), Cantabro abrasion loss and semi-circular bending (SCB) tests. Results reveal that the moisture damage, raveling and fracture resistance of asphalt mixture decrease with aging and the ITS and Marshall properties improve with aging. After 7-day long-term aging, the TSR of the mixtures made by LA, SA, SSA and CSA, decreases, 28.8%, 48.5%, 8.8% and 15%, respectively, while, the ITS in dry condition increases, 61.9%, 33%, 62% and 81%, respectively. The fracture properties and moisture damage resistance of asphalt concrete made by SSA and CSA are less affected by aging than those made by LA and SA. Statistical analysis revealed that the effect of aggregate type, aging condition and their interaction on the mixture properties is significant.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Civil Engineering Department, University of Zanjan, Zanjan, Iran
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1515/ijpeat-2016-003910.1515/ijpeat-2016-0039 ↗
2. 10.3390/su1410594210.3390/su14105942 ↗
3. Aliha, M. R. M., Behbahani, H., Fazaeli, H., & Rezaifar, M. H. (2015). Experimental study on mode I fracture toughness of different asphalt mixtures. Scientia Iranica, 22(1), 120–130.
4. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.12010.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.120 ↗
5. Arabani, M., & Ferdowsi, B. (2009). Evaluating the semi-circular bending test for HMA mixtures. IJE Transactions A: Basics, 22(1), 47–58.
6. 10.1016/j.scient.2012.07.00710.1016/j.scient.2012.07.007 ↗
7. Bell, C. A., Kliewer, J. E., & Sosnovke, D. A. (1995). Investigation of the relationship between field performance and laboratory aging properties of asphalt mixtures. In G. A. Huber, & D. S. Decker (Eds.), Engineering properties of asphalt mixtures and the relationship with 7eir performance. ASTM STP 1265, American Society for Testing and Materials.
8. Bell, C. A., & Sosnovske, D. (1994). SHRP-A-384: Aging: Binder validation. TRB, National Research Council.
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000442010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004420 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.09710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.097 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13112410.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131124 ↗
12. Chesner W. H. Collins R. J. MacKay M. H. & Emery J. (2002). User guidelines for waste and by-product materials in pavement construction. No. FHWA-RD-97-148 Guideline Manual Report No. 480017. Recycled Materials Resource Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/38365/dot_38365_DS1.pdf
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11778110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117781 ↗
14. Christensen W. D. Bonaquist R. & Jack D. P. (2000). Evaluation of triaxial strength as a simple test for asphalt concrete rut resistance. Final Report. Pennsylvania Dept. of Transportation. https://ntlrepository.blob.core.windows.net/lib/17000/17200/17208/PB2001100197.pdf.
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.10510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.105 ↗
16. 10.1177/036119811983722310.1177/0361198119837223 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12003710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120037 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.11610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.116 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000470210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004702 ↗
20. Falchetto, A. C., Moon, K. H., Wang, D., Riccardi, C., Kang, M. S., & Wistuba, M. P. (2017, June 21–24). Investigation on the combined recycling of reclaimed asphalt pavement and steel slag in asphalt mixture at low temperature. In 5th international conference on sustainable solid waste management, At Athens, Greece.
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000403410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004034 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cscm.2021.e0086110.1016/j.cscm.2021.e00861 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000183210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001832 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00171-410.1016/S0921-3449(02)00171-4 ↗
25. Hamzah, M. O., & Teoh, C. Y. (2008). Effects of temperature on resilient modulus of dense asphalt mixtures incorporating steel slag subjected to short term oven ageing. International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2(10), 222–226. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11936735.pdf.
26. Hansen, K., & Copeland, A. (2019). Asphalt pavement industry survey on recycled materials and warm-mix asphalt usage: 2016. Prepared by National Asphalt Pavement Association for U.S Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. https://member.asphaltpavement.org/Shop/Product-Catalog/Product-Details?productid={9BC71D4C-2307-EA11-A812-000D3A4DBC41}.
27. 10.17226/2323810.17226/23238 ↗
28. Havanagi V. G. Sinha A. K. Prasad P. Sitaramanjaneyulu K. & Mathur S. (2009). Copper slag as an alternative material for road construction. Twenty fifth International Conference on Solid Waste Technology and Management Philadelphia USA March 2009.
29. Houston W. N. Mirza M. W. Zapata C. E. & Raghavendra S. (2005). Environmental effects in pavement mix and structural design systems. Part 1 of Contractor’s Final Report for NCHRP Project 9–23. Arizona State University.
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12785010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127850 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13236610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132366 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15377510.1016/j.apsusc.2022.153775 ↗
33. Huang, B., Kingery, W. R., & Zhang, Z. (2004, June 8–9). Laboratory study of fatigue characteristics of HMA mixtures containing RAP. In International symposium on design and construction of long lasting asphalt pavements, Auburn, Alabama, USA.
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13090910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.130909 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e0138410.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01384 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.15910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.159 ↗
37. 10.1007/s00107-010-0478-y10.1007/s00107-010-0478-y ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.014 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.05210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.052 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12133610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121336 ↗
41. 10.1007/s40831-023-00683-410.1007/s40831-023-00683-4 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.106810.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1068 ↗
43. 10.1016/0013-7944(93)90030-V10.1016/0013-7944(93)90030-V ↗
44. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13093210.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130932 ↗
45. 10.3390/app710108810.3390/app7101088 ↗
46. 10.3390/su1409502210.3390/su14095022 ↗
47. 10.1007/s10098-016-1289-610.1007/s10098-016-1289-6 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10865810.1016/j.measurement.2020.108658 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.17710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.177 ↗
50. 10.1139/cjce-2019-009310.1139/cjce-2019-0093 ↗
51. 10.1080/10298436.2021.193119810.1080/10298436.2021.1931198 ↗
52. 10.1007/s42947-021-00036-y10.1007/s42947-021-00036-y ↗
53. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12465310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124653 ↗
54. 10.22034/jess.2022.328993.172010.22034/jess.2022.328993.1720 ↗
55. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000159510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001595 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13128510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131285 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.10410.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.104 ↗
58. Petersen, J. C. (2002). Chemistry of asphalt-aggregate interaction. Moisture Damage Symposium.
59. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.014 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.11286710.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112867 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.08110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.05.081 ↗
62. Sarsam, S. I., & Adbulmajeed, S. M. (2014). Influence of aging time on asphalt pavement performance. Journal of Engineering, 20(12), 12. https://www.iasj.net/iasj/download/08d954b35fb65f25.
63. 10.3390/min1301009010.3390/min13010090 ↗
64. 10.1007/978-981-16-6383-3_1110.1007/978-981-16-6383-3_11 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.55710.1016/j.matpr.2020.07.557 ↗
66. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000342710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003427 ↗
67. 10.32604/jrm.2022.01682810.32604/jrm.2022.016828 ↗
68. 10.1155/2018/342896110.1155/2018/3428961 ↗
69. 10.1080/14680629.2022.210080810.1080/14680629.2022.2100808 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.09.10210.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.09.102 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.12.00710.1016/j.resconrec.2009.12.007 ↗
72. Whiteoak, D., & Read, J. (2005). Shell bitumen handbook. Shell Bitumen.
73. 10.1080/14680629.2020.172776910.1080/14680629.2020.1727769 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13048410.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130484 ↗
75. 10.5703/128828431427510.5703/1288284314275 ↗
76. Yousefi, A., Pirmohammad, S., & Sobhi, S. (2020). Fracture toughness of warm mix asphalts containing reclaimed asphalt pavement. Journal of Stress Analysis, 5(1), 85–98.
77. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12917510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.129175 ↗
78. 10.21467/proceedings.4.2910.21467/proceedings.4.29 ↗
79. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12565510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125655 ↗
80. 10.22119/ijte.2016.1477510.22119/ijte.2016.14775 ↗
81. 10.1080/10298436.2017.133988410.1080/10298436.2017.1339884 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11784610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117846 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.fuproc.2022.10736110.1016/j.fuproc.2022.107361 ↗