journal article·2025-09-19

Mechanical performance evaluation of cementitious stabilized recycled asphalt aggregate materials incorporating zeolite/alkaline metals nanotechnology-based additive

Eman Mousa, Moharram Fouad, Islam Abo El-Naga, El-Metwally El-Sekelly, Ahmed S. El-Ashwah

Publisher page

Abstract

The high carbon footprint of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) has driven interest in sustainable pavement construction alternatives. This study explored the effectiveness of enhancing OPC with a nanotechnology-based additive, RoadCem (RC), in full-depth reclamation (FDR) applications. Extensive laboratory analysis evaluated compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths, resilient modulus, durability of FDR mixtures, and the microstructure of raw materials. Results showed a 39% increase in unconfined compressive strength (UCS) with the OPC/RC combination. ANOVA tests indicated statistically significant individual and interactive effects of FDR components on UCS (p-values < 0.0001). Increasing RC content at 3%OPC notably improved tensile and flexural strengths and modulus by up to 44%, 47%, and 39%, respectively. Microstructure analysis revealed the potential of RC to modify OPC hydration chemistry by promoting longer needle-like crystals, enhancing interfacial bonding and matrix density. A cost analysis revealed 37% savings when using OPC/RC combination, highlighting the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of RC modifier.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Horus University

Mansoura University

Tanta University

Funding

STDF

References (66)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12247610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122476 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.06910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.069 ↗
3. 10.1080/10298436.2017.138850810.1080/10298436.2017.1388508 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.04.00210.1016/j.jrmge.2016.04.002 ↗
5. 10.1061/9780784482452.02610.1061/9780784482452.026 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.011 ↗
7. Asphalt Institute. (1981). Thickness design: asphalt pavements for highways and streets Manual series No. 1 (MS-1) US Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 81-68616.
8. Asphalt Recycling and Reclaiming Association (ARRA). (2001). Basic Asphalt Recycling Manual. Asphalt Recycling and Reclaiming Association. FHWA.
9. 10.1007/s42947-020-6010-910.1007/s42947-020-6010-9 ↗
10. Blass, J. (2017). Environmental impact comparison: Conventional road construction and RoadCem constructions. PowerCem Technologies BV.
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.13008910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130089 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12386610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123866 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.10062610.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100626 ↗
14. 10.1007/s12205-018-1527-z10.1007/s12205-018-1527-z ↗
15. 10.12989/gae.2021.25.2.14310.12989/gae.2021.25.2.143 ↗
16. 10.1007/s40891-021-00328-010.1007/s40891-021-00328-0 ↗
17. 10.1080/14680629.2024.240985610.1080/14680629.2024.2409856 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10064-020-02069-210.1007/s10064-020-02069-2 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12585810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125858 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000379810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003798 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11368-021-02974-310.1007/s11368-021-02974-3 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14154810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141548 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11962610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119626 ↗
24. 10.3141/2575-0310.3141/2575-03 ↗
25. 10.3141/2310-1210.3141/2310-12 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000082010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000820 ↗
27. ECP-104. (2018). Egyptian code of practice for urban and rural roads. Housing and Building National Central Research.
28. 10.3390/su13191076010.3390/su131910760 ↗
29. 10.1080/10298436.2020.175441610.1080/10298436.2020.1754416 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000115810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001158 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.12.01810.1016/j.jrmge.2019.12.018 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.11910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.119 ↗
33. 10.1080/14680629.2013.79436710.1080/14680629.2013.794367 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.crgsc.2020.10001910.1016/j.crgsc.2020.100019 ↗
35. 10.3141/2026-0610.3141/2026-06 ↗
36. Halsted G. E. Luhr D. R. & Adaska W. S. (2006). Guide to cement-treated base (CTB).
37. 10.1155/2015/79508010.1155/2015/795080 ↗
38. 10.1080/14680629.2020.177234910.1080/14680629.2020.1772349 ↗
39. 10.1061/9780784480137.06410.1061/9780784480137.064 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.15610.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.156 ↗
41. 10.3390/coatings1405057310.3390/coatings14050573 ↗
42. Liu, W., & Scullion, T. (2011). Flexible pavement design system FPS 21: User's manual. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas Department of Transportation.
43. 10.3141/1813-1310.3141/1813-13 ↗
44. Marjanovic P. Egyed C. E. & de La Roij P. (2009). The road to the future: Manual for working with RC 584 2009.
45. Miller H. J. Guthrie W. S. Crane R. A. & Smith B. (2006). Evaluation of cement-stabilized full-depth-recycled base materials for frost and early traffic conditions.
46. Montero, R., Baneros, R., Lakerveld, P., & Veerbeek, W. (2012). Macro-economic effects of using the PowerCem technology on road infrastructure in flood risk areas. PowerCem Technologies BV.
47. 10.1139/cjce-2016-043510.1139/cjce-2016-0435 ↗
48. Mousa, E., Fouad, M., El-Naga, I. A., El-Sekelly, E. A., & El-Ashwah, A. S. (2025a). Alkali-activated binders for recycled asphalt aggregate materials: A sustainable Portland cement alternative. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering.
49. 10.1080/14680629.2025.254596910.1080/14680629.2025.2545969 ↗
50. Ouf, M. S. (2012). Effect of using pozzolanic materials on the properties of Egyptian soils. Life Science Journal, 9(1), 554–560.
51. Reeder, G. D., Harrington, D. S., Ayers, M. E., & Adaska, W. (2017). Guide to full-depth reclamation (FDR) with cement. National Concrete Pavement Technology Center, Institute for Transportation, Iowa State University. 96. Report No.: SR1006P.7.
52. Santucci L. E. (1977). Thickness design procedure for asphalt and emulsified asphalt mixes. In Volume I of proceedings of 4th International Conference on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements Ann Arbor Michigan August 22-26 1977. (No. Proceeding).
53. 10.17226/2490210.17226/24902 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.005 ↗
55. 10.1080/17486025.2016.121554810.1080/17486025.2016.1215548 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.14410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.144 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13690110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136901 ↗
58. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(239)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(239) ↗
59. 10.3141/1652-3310.3141/1652-33 ↗
60. Thomas T. (2010). Mix Designs for FDR CIR and HIR. In Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States In-Place Recycling Conference. Harrisburg Pennsylvania1010.
61. Ventura D. & Koloane T. (2005). Laboratory evaluation of PowerCem blend to determine its suitability as a road building material stabilizer. Zwijndrecht The Netherlands.
62. Wirtgen F. (2004). Cold recycling manual. Windhagen Alemania.
63. Wu P. (2015). Cement stabilized materials with use of RoadCem additive.
64. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.006 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.22110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.221 ↗
66. 10.3141/2212-1210.3141/2212-12 ↗