Mechanical performance evaluation of cementitious stabilized recycled asphalt aggregate materials incorporating zeolite/alkaline metals nanotechnology-based additive
Source abstract
Abstract
The high carbon footprint of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) has driven interest in sustainable pavement construction alternatives. This study explored the effectiveness of enhancing OPC with a nanotechnology-based additive, RoadCem (RC), in full-depth reclamation (FDR) applications. Extensive laboratory analysis evaluated compressive, tensile, and flexural strengths, resilient modulus, durability of FDR mixtures, and the microstructure of raw materials. Results showed a 39% increase in unconfined compressive strength (UCS) with the OPC/RC combination. ANOVA tests indicated statistically significant individual and interactive effects of FDR components on UCS (p-values < 0.0001). Increasing RC content at 3%OPC notably improved tensile and flexural strengths and modulus by up to 44%, 47%, and 39%, respectively. Microstructure analysis revealed the potential of RC to modify OPC hydration chemistry by promoting longer needle-like crystals, enhancing interfacial bonding and matrix density. A cost analysis revealed 37% savings when using OPC/RC combination, highlighting the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of RC modifier.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Horus University
Mansoura University
Tanta University
Funding
STDF
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12247610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122476 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.06910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.069 ↗
3. 10.1080/10298436.2017.138850810.1080/10298436.2017.1388508 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2016.04.00210.1016/j.jrmge.2016.04.002 ↗
5. 10.1061/9780784482452.02610.1061/9780784482452.026 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.01110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.011 ↗
7. Asphalt Institute. (1981). Thickness design: asphalt pavements for highways and streets Manual series No. 1 (MS-1) US Library of Congress Catalog Card No. 81-68616.
8. Asphalt Recycling and Reclaiming Association (ARRA). (2001). Basic Asphalt Recycling Manual. Asphalt Recycling and Reclaiming Association. FHWA.
9. 10.1007/s42947-020-6010-910.1007/s42947-020-6010-9 ↗
10. Blass, J. (2017). Environmental impact comparison: Conventional road construction and RoadCem constructions. PowerCem Technologies BV.
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.13008910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.130089 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12386610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123866 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2021.10062610.1016/j.trgeo.2021.100626 ↗
14. 10.1007/s12205-018-1527-z10.1007/s12205-018-1527-z ↗
15. 10.12989/gae.2021.25.2.14310.12989/gae.2021.25.2.143 ↗
16. 10.1007/s40891-021-00328-010.1007/s40891-021-00328-0 ↗
17. 10.1080/14680629.2024.240985610.1080/14680629.2024.2409856 ↗
18. 10.1007/s10064-020-02069-210.1007/s10064-020-02069-2 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12585810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125858 ↗
20. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000379810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003798 ↗
21. 10.1007/s11368-021-02974-310.1007/s11368-021-02974-3 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.14154810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2025.141548 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11962610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119626 ↗
24. 10.3141/2575-0310.3141/2575-03 ↗
25. 10.3141/2310-1210.3141/2310-12 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000082010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000820 ↗
27. ECP-104. (2018). Egyptian code of practice for urban and rural roads. Housing and Building National Central Research.
28. 10.3390/su13191076010.3390/su131910760 ↗
29. 10.1080/10298436.2020.175441610.1080/10298436.2020.1754416 ↗
30. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000115810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001158 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jrmge.2019.12.01810.1016/j.jrmge.2019.12.018 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.11910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.119 ↗
33. 10.1080/14680629.2013.79436710.1080/14680629.2013.794367 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.crgsc.2020.10001910.1016/j.crgsc.2020.100019 ↗
35. 10.3141/2026-0610.3141/2026-06 ↗
36. Halsted G. E. Luhr D. R. & Adaska W. S. (2006). Guide to cement-treated base (CTB).
37. 10.1155/2015/79508010.1155/2015/795080 ↗
38. 10.1080/14680629.2020.177234910.1080/14680629.2020.1772349 ↗
39. 10.1061/9780784480137.06410.1061/9780784480137.064 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.15610.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.156 ↗
41. 10.3390/coatings1405057310.3390/coatings14050573 ↗
42. Liu, W., & Scullion, T. (2011). Flexible pavement design system FPS 21: User's manual. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas Department of Transportation.
43. 10.3141/1813-1310.3141/1813-13 ↗
44. Marjanovic P. Egyed C. E. & de La Roij P. (2009). The road to the future: Manual for working with RC 584 2009.
45. Miller H. J. Guthrie W. S. Crane R. A. & Smith B. (2006). Evaluation of cement-stabilized full-depth-recycled base materials for frost and early traffic conditions.
46. Montero, R., Baneros, R., Lakerveld, P., & Veerbeek, W. (2012). Macro-economic effects of using the PowerCem technology on road infrastructure in flood risk areas. PowerCem Technologies BV.
47. 10.1139/cjce-2016-043510.1139/cjce-2016-0435 ↗
48. Mousa, E., Fouad, M., El-Naga, I. A., El-Sekelly, E. A., & El-Ashwah, A. S. (2025a). Alkali-activated binders for recycled asphalt aggregate materials: A sustainable Portland cement alternative. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering.
49. 10.1080/14680629.2025.254596910.1080/14680629.2025.2545969 ↗
50. Ouf, M. S. (2012). Effect of using pozzolanic materials on the properties of Egyptian soils. Life Science Journal, 9(1), 554–560.
51. Reeder, G. D., Harrington, D. S., Ayers, M. E., & Adaska, W. (2017). Guide to full-depth reclamation (FDR) with cement. National Concrete Pavement Technology Center, Institute for Transportation, Iowa State University. 96. Report No.: SR1006P.7.
52. Santucci L. E. (1977). Thickness design procedure for asphalt and emulsified asphalt mixes. In Volume I of proceedings of 4th International Conference on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements Ann Arbor Michigan August 22-26 1977. (No. Proceeding).
53. 10.17226/2490210.17226/24902 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.02.005 ↗
55. 10.1080/17486025.2016.121554810.1080/17486025.2016.1215548 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.14410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.08.144 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13690110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136901 ↗
58. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(239)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(239) ↗
59. 10.3141/1652-3310.3141/1652-33 ↗
60. Thomas T. (2010). Mix Designs for FDR CIR and HIR. In Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States In-Place Recycling Conference. Harrisburg Pennsylvania1010.
61. Ventura D. & Koloane T. (2005). Laboratory evaluation of PowerCem blend to determine its suitability as a road building material stabilizer. Zwijndrecht The Netherlands.
62. Wirtgen F. (2004). Cold recycling manual. Windhagen Alemania.
63. Wu P. (2015). Cement stabilized materials with use of RoadCem additive.
64. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.006 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.22110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.221 ↗
66. 10.3141/2212-1210.3141/2212-12 ↗