Predicting bearing capacity and trafficability classes of forest roads using road properties and surrounding terrain information
Source abstract
Abstract
Mills wish to maintain a year-round continuous flow of fresh roundwood, which is a major challenge during low-bearing capacity seasons in Finland, as there are few forest roads in the current network that are suitable for year-round use. This study explores methods to predict the bearing capacity of forest roads in Finland, using easily measurable road and terrain characteristics which can be potentially obtained through remote sensing. Traditional manual assessments of road conditions are labor-intensive, highlighting the need for alternative methods. The study found that road width is the most influential factor in predicting bearing capacity, with LiDAR data being potentially useful for measuring this variable. Despite moderate model results (R2 = 25−34%, RMSE% = 36−38%), the trafficability classification showed low accuracy, peaking at 38.7%. Gamma-ray data added limited value in predicting road capacity, indicating that its utility is minimal compared to other factors such as road width.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications · Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies · Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of Eastern Finland
Metsäteho Oy
Funding
University of Eastern Finland · Finnish Cultural Foundation
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.5194/hess-18-3623-201410.5194/hess-18-3623-2014 ↗
2. 10.1007/s11676-014-0544-010.1007/s11676-014-0544-0 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.01.01310.1016/j.geoderma.2012.01.013 ↗
4. 10.1080/02827581.2014.88154610.1080/02827581.2014.881546 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.10448110.1016/j.jappgeo.2021.104481 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.10.01710.1016/j.geoderma.2012.10.017 ↗
7. 10.1080/14680629.2017.128335610.1080/14680629.2017.1283356 ↗
8. ESRI Inc. (2016). ArcGIS desktop (Version 10.5). https://desktop.arcgis.com/en/
9. 10.1007/978-3-642-34333-910.1007/978-3-642-34333-9 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.12.00210.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.12.002 ↗
11. Finnish Transport and Infrastructure Agency. (2019). Digiroad – Väylävirasto – Tie- ja Katuverkon Tietojärjestelmä Kansallinen. Finnish Transport Agency – National Road and Street Database. https://vayla.fi/en/-/digiroad-publication-1-2019-is-now-available
12. Geological Survey of Finland (GSF). (2020). File service of open soil data – Maankamara. Retrieved June 6 2021 from https://gtkdata.gtk.fi/Maankamara/index.html
13. George, K. P. (2003). Falling Weight Deflectometer for estimating subgrade resilient moduli. Final report. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Mississippi. 113 p.
14. Grajewski, S. M. (2016). Influence of pavement moisture content on the load-bearing capacity of forest road. Infrastructure and Ecology of Rural Areas, 4(2), 1451–1462.
15. 10.1190/1.144424210.1190/1.1444242 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.geodrs.2019.e0025110.1016/j.geodrs.2019.e00251 ↗
17. 10.3390/rs1004049210.3390/rs10040492 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.125010.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1250 ↗
19. 10.1139/x03-00510.1139/x03-005 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.catena.2006.10.01010.1016/j.catena.2006.10.010 ↗
21. 10.14214/df.25110.14214/df.251 ↗
22. Kaakkurivaara, T., Kolisoja, P., Uusitalo, J., & Vuorimies, N. (2016). Fly ash in forest road rehabilitation. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 37(1), 119–130.
23. 10.1139/cjce-2016-019310.1139/cjce-2016-0193 ↗
24. 10.13140/RG.2.2.31965.0048010.13140/RG.2.2.31965.00480 ↗
25. 10.14214/sf.123910.14214/sf.1239 ↗
26. 10.1139/cjfr-2021-000110.1139/cjfr-2021-0001 ↗
27. Korpilahti, A. (2008). Metsätehon raportti 202: Metsäteiden kuntoinventoinnin ja kuntotiedon hyödyntämisen toimintamalli: 202. Metsäteho Oy. https://metsateho.fi/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Raportti_202_AK.pdf
28. Kuhn M. Wing J. Weston S. Williams A. Keefer C. Engelhardt A. Cooper T. Mayer Z. Kenkel B. R Core Team Benesty M. Lescarbeau R. Ziem A. Scrucca L. Tang Y. Candan C. & Hunt T. (2020). caret: Classification and regression training. R package (Version 6.0-86). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caret
29. 10.1007/s13280-019-01196-910.1007/s13280-019-01196-9 ↗
30. Malinen, J., Nousiainen, V., Palojärvi, K., & Palander, T. (2014). Prospects and challenges of timber trucking in a changing operational environment in Finland. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 35, 91–100.
31. Marchuk, S., & Ostendorf, B. (2009). Relationship between soil properties and airborne GAMMA-radiometric data. In B. Ostendorf, P. Baldock, D. Bruce, M. Burdett, & P. Corcoran (Eds.), Proceedings of the surveying and spatial sciences institute biennial international conference, Adelaide (pp. 1041–1051). Surveying & Spatial Sciences Institute.
32. 10.1201/978042917346210.1201/9780429173462 ↗
33. Minty, B. R. S. (1997). Fundamentals of airborne gamma-ray spectrometry. AGSO Journal of Australian Geology and Geophysics, 17(2), 39–50.
34. 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01094.x10.1111/j.1365-2389.2008.01094.x ↗
35. 10.5558/tfc84568-410.5558/tfc84568-4 ↗
36. 10.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[846:MWACOT]2.0.CO;210.1672/0277-5212(2007)27[846:MWACOT]2.0.CO;2 ↗
37. National Land Survey of Finland. (2019). Elevation model 2m. https://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/en/maps-and-spatial-data/expert-users/product-descriptions/elevation-model-2-m
38. National land survey of Finland. (2020). File service of open data. Retrieved from August 2021 https://www.avoindata.fi/data/fi/dataset/suomen-maakunnat-2021-vuoden-2018-maakuntakoodeilla
39. National Land Survey of Finland. (2021a). Laser scanning data 2008–2019. https://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/en/maps-and-spatial-data/expert-users/product-descritions/laser-scanning-data
40. National Land Survey of Finland. (2021b). 5p Laser scanning data 2020. https://www.maanmittauslaitos.fi/en/maps-and-spatial-data/expert-users/product-descriptions/laser-scanning-data-5-p
41. Natural resources institution of Finland. (2023). Retrieved February 2024 from https://www.luke.fi/en/news/removals-decreased-to-75-million-cubic-metres-in-2022/
42. Pinheiro J. Bates D. DebRoy S. Sarkar D. & R Core Team. (2019). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models (version 3.1-140) [R package]. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
43. 10.1109/ICPR.2014.31910.1109/ICPR.2014.319 ↗
44. R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
45. Saarenketo, T., & Aho, S. (2005). Managing spring thaw weakening on low volume roads: Problem description, load restriction policies, monitoring and rehabilitation 2005. Roadscanners Oy. https://www.roadex.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/2_3-Spring_Thaw_Weakening_l.pdf
46. 10.1007/s42947-021-00015-310.1007/s42947-021-00015-3 ↗
47. Salmivaara, A. (2020). Cartographic Depth-to-Water (DTW) index map, 2m. CSC – IT Center for Science Ltd. https://etsin.fairdata.fi/dataset/6169811e-1f16-452b-ad6d-efec78fc51f2
48. 10.1080/14680629.2012.75460010.1080/14680629.2012.754600 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.jterra.2005.05.00210.1016/j.jterra.2005.05.002 ↗
50. 10.1071/EG0209510.1071/EG02095 ↗
51. Terratest. (2022). Model 6000 BLE. https://light-weight-deflectometer.com/#technical-details
52. 10.14214/ma.691010.14214/ma.6910 ↗
53. Venäläinen P. Alanne H. Ovaskainen H. Poikela A. & Strandström M. (2018). Kausivaihtelun kustannukset ja vähentämiskeinot puun toimitusketjussa. Metsätehon tuloskalvosarja 8/2017. http://www.metsateho.fi/kausivaihtelun-kustannukset-ja-vahentamiskeinot/
54. Venäläinen, P., & Nousiainen, M. (2022). Metsätehon raportti 264: Yksityistietiedon tietolajit. Nykytila, suositukset määritelmiksi ja kehittämistarpeet. https://www.metsateho.fi/wp-content/uploads/Raportti-264-Yksityistietiedon-tietolajit.pdf.
55. 10.14214/ma.624710.14214/ma.6247 ↗
56. 10.1139/cjfr-2015-006710.1139/cjfr-2015-0067 ↗
57. 10.5194/isprs-annals-III-8-167-201610.5194/isprs-annals-III-8-167-2016 ↗
58. 10.3390/f1111116510.3390/f11111165 ↗
59. 10.14214/sf.1037110.14214/sf.10371 ↗
60. 10.1071/S9803d810.1071/S9803d8 ↗