Triaxial resilient modulus regression models for cold recycled asphalt mixtures
Source abstract
Abstract
Cold recycled asphalt mixtures (CRAMs) may present a compressive resilient modulus dependent on the stress state. Currently, there is no widespread consensus on a triaxial resilient modulus (TxRM) model for CRAM analysis. A widely accepted TxRM model would favour the analysis of CRAM’s layered pavement systems. This paper assessed the adequacy of different TxRM models of CRAM’s specimens with different compositions, aggregate gradation and physical characteristics. Based on the literature, three different TxRM models were selected. The models’ non-linear estimation was performed through Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm. Model selection analysis was based on residuals square sum root (RSSR) assessment. Ni et al.’s model was found to be the most adequate for CRAM’s TxRM modelling based on RSSR analysis. The model selection was done regardless of aggregate gradation, binder type/content, air void content, RAP content, TxRM values range, active filler type and curing time of the tested specimens.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Transportation Engineering, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Department of Production Engineering, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
Funding
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico Científico e Tecnológico · Coordenação de Aperfeiçamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior · Fundação de Amparo ã Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo · Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo.
References (37)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1109/TAC.1974.110070510.1109/TAC.1974.1100705 ↗
2. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials – AASHTO. (2017). Standard Method of Test for Determining the Resilient Modulus of Soils and Aggregate Materials (T307-99).
3. ARA Inc. ERES Consultants Division. (2004). Guide for mechanistic – empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures (Report No. NCHRP Project 1-37A).
4. 10.1139/cjce-2016-011110.1139/cjce-2016-0111 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000150810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001508 ↗
6. 10.1080/14680629.2013.87205110.1080/14680629.2013.872051 ↗
7. Departamento Nacional De Insfraestrutura De Transportes – DNIT. (2018). Pavimentação – Solos – Determinação do modulo de resiliência – Método de ensaio (DNIT 134/2018 – ME).
8. 10.1002/978111862559010.1002/9781118625590 ↗
9. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000000910.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000009 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.09110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.091 ↗
11. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126172610.1080/14680629.2016.1261726 ↗
12. 10.3141/2095-1310.3141/2095-13 ↗
13. 10.1080/14680629.2016.121351110.1080/14680629.2016.1213511 ↗
14. Jenkins, K. J., Robroch, S., Henderson, M. G., Wilkinson, J., & Molenaar, A. A. A. (2004). Advanced testing for cold recycling treatment selection on N7 near Cape Town. In: 8th Conference on Asphalt Pavements for Southern Africa (CAPSA'04). Sun City, South Africa.
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:6(279)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:6(279) ↗
16. 10.1080/14680629.2019.158955810.1080/14680629.2019.1589558 ↗
17. 10.1080/10298436.2019.165556410.1080/10298436.2019.1655564 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.06510.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.065 ↗
19. 10.1137/011103010.1137/0111030 ↗
20. 10.1080/14680629.2021.190840510.1080/14680629.2021.1908405 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12600310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126003 ↗
22. Moloto P. K. (2010). Accelerated curing protocol for bitumen stabilized materials (Master’s thesis Stellenbosch University) SUNScholar Research Repository. https://scholar.sun.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10019.1/4187/Moloto%20PK.pdf%20thesis.pdf?sequence=1
23. Ni B. Hopkins T. C. Sun L. & Beckham T. L. (2002 June 24–26). Modeling the resilient modulus of soils. Proceedings of the sixth international conference on the bearing capacity of roads railways and airfields. (Vol. 2 pp. 1131–1142). A. A. Balkema Publishers.10.1201/9781003078821-34 ↗
24. 10.3141/1874-1310.3141/1874-13 ↗
25. Pezo, R. F. (1993). A general method of reporting resilient modulus tests of soils – a pavement engineer’s point of view. Proceedings of the 72nd annual meeting of the transportation research board, Paper No: 93082. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
26. 10.1080/14680629.2019.163375410.1080/14680629.2019.1633754 ↗
27. 10.1007/b9889010.1007/b98890 ↗
28. 10.1080/14680629.2010.969026310.1080/14680629.2010.9690263 ↗
29. 10.1214/aos/117634413610.1214/aos/1176344136 ↗
30. Seber, G. A. F., & Wild, C. J. (2003). Nonlinear regression. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
31. 10.1186/1471-2210-10-610.1186/1471-2210-10-6 ↗
32. StatSoft I. (2004). STATISTICA (version 7) [computer software]. Statsoft.
33. 10.1007/978-3-319-71023-5_610.1007/978-3-319-71023-5_6 ↗
34. 10.3141/%2F1874-1310.3141/%2F1874-13 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.06.006 ↗
36. Wirtgen. (2012). Cold recycling – Wirtgen cold recycling technology. Wirtgen GmbH.
37. Witczak, M. W., & Uzan, J. (1988). The universal airport pavement design system (Report I of IV: Granular material characterization). University of Maryland.