journal article·2025-01-02

Conversions of viscoelastic deflections of asphalt pavement under TSD load to elastic ones for pavement condition assessments

Zhang Chen, Xiaoying Tong, Huailei Cheng, Lijun Sun

Publisher page

Abstract

The Traffic Speed Deflectometer (TSD) facility has gained popularity in assessing asphalt pavement conditions due to its efficient testing process and minimal disruption to traffic flow. Current applications of TSD test results resemble those developed for the Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) test results, such as analysing the deflection basin shape and back-calculating the pavement layer modulus. However, the TSD facility induces more viscoelastic pavement deflections compared to FWD, primarily due to its rolling load. This research focuses on converting TSD’s viscoelastic deflections under a wider range of loading conditions into elastic deflections under FWD load. This conversion aims to facilitate the use of FWD-based approaches for analysing TSD deflection data. The findings indicate that the converted TSD deflections generate more reasonable evaluation results, further emphasizing the necessity of converting TSD deflections to elastic ones. The models proposed in this research serve as valuable references for performing the viscoelastic-elastic deflection conversion.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Transport Systems and Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Tongji University

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China · Research Project of Shanghai Transportation Commission

References (47)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3141/2153-1810.3141/2153-18 ↗
2. Bodin D. Zhalejoo N. & Garton D. (2019). Improved methods of using pavement deflection data in the design of rehabilitation treatments (No. AP-T350-19). Transportation Research Board.
3. 10.1080/14680629.2018.143646710.1080/14680629.2018.1436467 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.44410.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.444 ↗
5. Cheng H. (2022). Determination of the stiffness moduli and fatigue endurance limits of asphalt pavements for perpetual pavement design [Thesis of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University] https://theses.lib.polyu.edu.hk/handle/200/12176.
6. 10.1080/10298436.2020.172428810.1080/10298436.2020.1724288 ↗
7. 10.1177/036119811982868510.1177/0361198119828685 ↗
8. 10.1080/10298436.2019.160734110.1080/10298436.2019.1607341 ↗
9. 10.1007/s11709-022-0811-710.1007/s11709-022-0811-7 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11851910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118519 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000342910.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003429 ↗
12. 10.1080/14680629.2021.192484210.1080/14680629.2021.1924842 ↗
13. 10.1139/cjce-2017-057010.1139/cjce-2017-0570 ↗
14. 10.13140/RG.2.2.18018.3808910.13140/RG.2.2.18018.38089 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12786910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127869 ↗
16. Flintsch, G. W., Ferne, B., Diefenderfer, B., Katicha, S., Bryce, J., & Nell, S. (2012a). Evaluation of traffic speed continuous deflection devices. 91st annual meeting, transportation research board, USA.2012/01/22-2012/01/26.
17. 10.3141/2304-0510.3141/2304-05 ↗
18. Heaton, J. (2008). Introduction to neural networks with java. Heaton Research, Inc.
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12615610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126156 ↗
20. 10.1061/JPEODX.000039310.1061/JPEODX.0000393 ↗
21. 10.1360/TB-2020-009410.1360/TB-2020-0094 ↗
22. Huang B. Zhang M. Gong H. & Polaczyk P. (2022). Evaluation of traffic speed deflectometer for collecting network level pavement structural data in Tennessee (No. RES2020-08). Department of Transportation.
23. Hyndman R. (1960). How to choose the number of hidden layers and nodes in a feedforward neural network. Cross Validated.
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12184210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121842 ↗
25. Krarup, J., Rasmussen, S., Aagaard, L., & Hjorth, P. G. (2006). Output from the Greenwood traffic speed deflectometer. Research into Practice: 22nd ARRB Conference.2006/10/29-2006/11/02.
26. 10.1061/9780784480090.00110.1061/9780784480090.001 ↗
27. 10.1080/14488353.2020.176630110.1080/14488353.2020.1766301 ↗
28. 10.1520/JTE2016018910.1520/JTE20160189 ↗
29. 10.1177/036119811882512210.1177/0361198118825122 ↗
30. 10.3141/2641-0910.3141/2641-09 ↗
31. 10.1061/JPEODX.000002510.1061/JPEODX.0000025 ↗
32. Nasimifar, S. (2015). 3D-move simulation of TSDDs for pavement characterizations. University of Nevada, Reno ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
33. NCHRP 1-37A Final Report. (2004). Guide for mechanistic-empirical design of new and rehabilitated pavement structures. Transportation Research Board.
34. 10.1177/036119811882350010.1177/0361198118823500 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0020-7683(98)00055-910.1016/S0020-7683(98)00055-9 ↗
36. Rada G. R. Nazarian S. Visintine B. A. Siddharthan R. & Thyagarajan S. (2016). Pavement structural evaluation at the network level (No. FHWA-HRT-15-074). United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Infrastructure Research and Development.
37. 10.1080/14680629.2022.202975910.1080/14680629.2022.2029759 ↗
38. 10.1080/14680629.2019.158749110.1080/14680629.2019.1587491 ↗
39. 10.1177/036119811875867510.1177/0361198118758675 ↗
40. 10.1007/978-94-024-0867-6_1010.1007/978-94-024-0867-6_10 ↗
41. 10.1016/C2014-0-02643-310.1016/C2014-0-02643-3 ↗
42. 10.1080/14680629.2022.206012510.1080/14680629.2022.2060125 ↗
43. 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1532910.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-15329 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12601410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.126014 ↗
45. 10.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2017.02.00710.11908/j.issn.0253-374x.2017.02.007 ↗
46. 10.1177/036119811875805810.1177/0361198118758058 ↗
47. 10.1177/036119812091429610.1177/0361198120914296 ↗