journal article·2024-01-02

The use of the semi-circular bending method to assess the intermediate-temperature fracture toughness of asphalt concrete mixes with reclaimed asphalt shingles

Piotr Zieliński

Publisher page

Abstract

The article presents the results of crack-resistance tests of asphalt concrete mixtures with the addition of reclaimed asphalt shingles (RAS) performed using the semi-circular bending method (SCB). The aim of the work is to assess two aging conditions of the asphalt mixtures (short-term and long-term) on their fracture toughness. The flexibility index (FI), toughness index (TI) and, to a slightly lesser extent, cracking resistance index (CRI), turned out to be the most sensitive to the fracture toughness of asphalt mixtures subjected to various aging conditions. In the case of mixtures with the addition of RAS, it was observed that by changing the order of dosing the ingredients (adding RAS after new bitumen has been mixed with the aggregate), it was possible to reduce the negative impact of long-term aging on the resistance to cracking.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Material Properties and Failure Mechanisms

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Roads, Railways and Traffic Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland

Funding

Politechnika Krakowska

References (34)

Show source-provided references
1. Al-Qadi, I. L., Ozer, H., & Lambros, J. (2019). Development of the Illinois flexibility index test. Transportation Research Circular, number E-C251, 31–50.
2. Al-Qadi I. L. Ozer H. Lambros J. El-Khatib A. Singhvi P. Khan T. Rivera J. & Doll B. (2015). Testing protocols to ensure performance of high asphalt binder replacement mixes using RAP and RAS Illinois Centre for Transportation USA Report No. FHWA-ICT-15-017 No. of pages 80.
3. 10.1080/14680629.2014.92741010.1080/14680629.2014.927410 ↗
4. A Manugistics Inc. Product. (2000). Computer program statgraphics plus v. 5.1 Rockville MD USA No. 537672031051732.
5. Bahia H. Hanz A. Teymourpour P. Swiertz D. Ling C. Chaturabong T. Mandal T. Varma R. Lyngdal E. & Hanz A. (2016). Analysis and feasibility of asphalt pavement performance-based specifications for WisDOT University of Wisconsin-Madison USA Report No. 0092-15-04 No. of pages 132.
6. 10.1080/14680629.2013.86176510.1080/14680629.2013.861765 ↗
7. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138906910.1080/14680629.2017.1389069 ↗
8. Buttlar W. G. Meister J. Jahangiri B. Majidifard H. & Rath P. (2019). Performance characteristics of modern recycled asphalt mixes in Missouri including ground tire rubber recycled roofing shingles and rejuvenators University of Missouri-Columbia USA Report No. cmr 19-002 No. of pages 103.
9. Chen X. (2019). Use of semi-circular bend test to characterize fracture properties of asphalt concrete with virgin and recycled materials PHD dissertation The Pennsylvania State University 188 pages.
10. Darnell J. & Bell C. A. (2015). Performance based selection of RAP/RAS in asphalt mixtures Report No. FHWA/OR-RD-16-08 Oregon Dept. of Transportation Washington USA No. of pages 107.
11. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126674010.1080/14680629.2016.1266740 ↗
12. Foxlow, J. J., Daniel, J. S., & Swamy, A. K. (2011). RAP or RAS? The differences in performance of HMA containing reclaimed asphalt pavement and reclaimed asphalt shingles. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 80, 347–376.
13. Generalna Dyrekcja Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad. (2014). Nawierzchnie asfaltowe na drogach krajowych WT-2 część I Mieszanki mineralno-asfaltowe Wymagania techniczne. [Bituminous pavements on national roads WT-2 part I Mineral-asphalt mixtures Technical requirements] GDDKiA Warsaw 52 pages.
14. Haslett, K. E. (2018). Evaluation of cracking indices for asphalt mixtures using SCB Tests at different temperatures and loading rates, Honours Theses and Capstones. University of New Hampshire.
15. Johnson E. Johnson G. Dai S. Linell D. McGraw J. & Watson M. (2010). Incorporation of recycled asphalt shingles in Hot-mixed asphalt pavement mixtures report No. MN/RC 2010-08 Minnesota Department of Transportation USA No. of pages 83.
16. Kanaan A. I. (2013). Impact of recycled asphalt shingles on asphalt concrete characteristics Master of science thesis . University of Illinois at Urban-Champaign.
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.014 ↗
18. 10.3141/2296-1210.3141/2296-12 ↗
19. Kim Y. R. Castorena C. Elwardany M. Rad F. Y. Underwood S. Gundla A. Gudipudi P. Farrar M. J. & Glaser R. R. (2018). Long-term aging of asphalt mixtures for performance testing and prediction NCHRP Research Report 871 (p. 127) Washington.10.17226/24959 ↗
20. Koehl K. (2014). Impact of recycling agents on the design of asphalt mixtures containing roofing shingles 56th annual IHEEP conference New Orleans Louisiana USA.
21. 10.1007/s42947-019-0055-710.1007/s42947-019-0055-7 ↗
22. McGraw, J., Zofka, A., Krivit, D., Schroer, J., Olson, R., & Marasteanu, M. (2007). Recycled asphalt shingles in hot mix asphalt. Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists-Proceedings of the Technical Sessions, 76, 235–274.
23. Nsemgiyumva G. Kim Y.-R. & You T. (2015). Development of semicircular bend (SCB) test method for performance testing of Nebraska asphalt mixtures University of Nebraska-Lincoln USA Report No. SPR-P1(15) MPMC07 No. of pages 60.
24. Ozer H. Al-Qadi I. L. Barber E. Okte E. Zhu Z. & Wu S. (2017). Evaluation of I-FIT results and machine variability using MNRoad test track mixtures Illinois Centre for Transportation USA Report No. FHWA-ICT-17-012 No. of pages 59.
25. Ozer H. Al-Qadi I. L. & Kanaan A. (2012). Laboratory evaluation of high asphalt binder replacement with recycled asphalt shingles (RAS) for a Low N-design asphalt mixture report No. FHWA-ICT-12-018 Illinois Center for Transportation and University of Illinois at Urban-Champaign USA No. of pages 32.
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.14410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.144 ↗
27. Paulsen G. Stroup-Gardiner M. & Epps J. (1986). Roofing waste in asphalt paving mixtures – economic consideration Report No. 6-331-709-1 . Center for Construction Materials Research University of Nevada-Reno.
28. PN-EN 12697-31. (2019). Bituminous Mixtures. Test methods. Specimen preparation by gyratory compactor.
29. PN-EN 12697-44. (2019). Bituminous Mixtures. Test methods. Crack propagation by semi-circular bending test.
30. 10.3390/environments605005510.3390/environments6050055 ↗
31. Saadeh S. Al-Zubi Y. & Renteria D. (2019). Sensitivity analysis on semi-circular bending tests using the Plackett-Burman matrix Mineta Transportation Institute USA Report No. 19-12 No. of pages 25.
32. Tang S. (2014). Evaluate the fracture and fatigue resistance of hot mix asphalt containing high percentage reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) materials at low and intermediate temperatures PHD dissertation Iowa State University (p. 121).
33. West R. Leiva F. Julian G. Taylor A. Brown E. & Willis J. R. (2018). Using recycled asphalt shingles with warm Mix asphalt technologies NCHRP research report 890 TRB Washington No. of pages 208.10.17226/25185 ↗
34. Zhou F. Li H. Hu S. Button J. W. & Epps J. A. (2013). Characterization and best use of recycled asphalt shingles in hot-mix asphalt Report No. FHWA/TX-13/0-6614-2 Texas A&M Transportation Institute USA No. of pages 107.