journal article·2025-12-02

Shear strength and dynamic deformation characteristics of clay stabilised with lime and lignin

Enquan Zhou, Qikai Yang, Xi Zuo, Man Zhang

Road Materials and Pavement Design· Volume 26· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

This study evaluated lime-lignin composite stabilisers for clay enhancement. Results showed their synergistic effect significantly improved shear strength (S), cohesion (c), friction angle (φ), and maximum dynamic shear modulus (Gmax) of clay. Microstructural analysis revealed lime-induced granular crystals and lignin-generated cementitious products, enhancing soil structure. After 1 and 7 days curing, the clay stabilised with 6% lime and 2% lignin exhibited the highest S, c, φ and Gmax. After 14 days curing, the clay stabilised with 4% lime and 4% lignin exhibited the highest S, c, φ, and Gmax. A novel relative structural characterization method based on c and φ was proposed, alongside a modified Hardin’s model integrating relative structural to predict Gmax. The study demonstrates that 6% lime + 2% lignin and 4% lime + 4% lignin ratios effectively enhance embankment clay properties, offering sustainable solutions for industrial byproduct utilization and soil stabilisation in geotechnical engineering.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics · Microbial Applications in Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Jiangsu University

Jinling Institute of Technology

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · Transportation Science and Technology Project of Nanjing

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.11364610.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113646 ↗
2. 10.5194/essd-11-1675-201910.5194/essd-11-1675-2019 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.07.00110.1016/j.tibtech.2004.07.001 ↗
4. 10.1080/14680629.2014.89153310.1080/14680629.2014.891533 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.09.00110.1016/j.trgeo.2018.09.001 ↗
6. 10.1080/1064119X.2014.96621710.1080/1064119X.2014.966217 ↗
7. 10.3141/2186-1410.3141/2186-14 ↗
8. 10.1179/096797804X459210.1179/096797804X4592 ↗
9. 10.1139/cgj-2014-02410.1139/cgj-2014-024 ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000121010.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001210 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.06.01010.1016/j.compgeo.2014.06.010 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000004510.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000045 ↗
13. 10.1080/14680629.2018.146880310.1080/14680629.2018.1468803 ↗
14. 10.1080/19386362.2019.159862310.1080/19386362.2019.1598623 ↗
15. 10.46830/wriwp.20.0011210.46830/wriwp.20.00112 ↗
16. 10.1007/s11440-013-0251-610.1007/s11440-013-0251-6 ↗
17. 10.1061/JSFEAQ.000110010.1061/JSFEAQ.0001100 ↗
18. 10.11779/CJGE20210900410.11779/CJGE202109004 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:6(837)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2008)134:6(837) ↗
20. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.441.295www.scientific.net/AMM.295-298.175510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.441.295www.scientific.net/AMM.295-298.1755 ↗
21. 10.1111/sum.1273610.1111/sum.12736 ↗
22. 10.1080/14680629.2020.175356410.1080/14680629.2020.1753564 ↗
23. 10.4324/978042921383010.4324/9780429213830 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000009710.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000097 ↗
25. 10.1007/s10706-019-00975-110.1007/s10706-019-00975-1 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.10555110.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105551 ↗
27. 10.1080/1064119X.2015.102490310.1080/1064119X.2015.1024903 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.15710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.05.157 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11950410.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119504 ↗
30. 10.1007/s42947-023-00317-810.1007/s42947-023-00317-8 ↗
31. 10.1080/14680629.2016.121272910.1080/14680629.2016.1212729 ↗
32. 10.1007/s40891-023-00460-z10.1007/s40891-023-00460-z ↗
33. 10.1016/B978-0-12-817048-9.00003-210.1016/B978-0-12-817048-9.00003-2 ↗
34. 10.1007/s10706-012-9532-310.1007/s10706-012-9532-3 ↗
35. 10.1080/10298436.2024.241095310.1080/10298436.2024.2410953 ↗
36. Specifications for Design of Highway Subgrades (JTG D30-2015). (2015). China Communications Press Beijing.
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.01510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.015 ↗
38. Standard for Engineering Classification of Soil (GB/T 50145-2007). (2008). China Planning Press Beijing.
39. Standard for Geotechnical Testing Method: (GB/T 50123-2019). (2019). China Planning Press Beijing.
40. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2017.08.00410.1016/j.trgeo.2017.08.004 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.21310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.213 ↗
42. Xie, D. Y., & Qi, J. L. (1999). Soil structure characteristics and new approach in research on its quantitative parameter. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 21(6), 651–656.
43. Yang, Z. Q., & Guo, J. Y. (1991). The physio-mechanical properties and micro-mechanism in lime-soil system. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 12(3), 11–23.
44. 10.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2015.05.02610.13544/j.cnki.jeg.2015.05.026 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.10.00510.1016/j.trgeo.2018.10.005 ↗
46. 10.1016/0956-053X(95)00013-P10.1016/0956-053X(95)00013-P ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.01110.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.011 ↗
48. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000249210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002492 ↗
49. Zhang T. Cai G. Liu S. & Puppala A. (2015). Stabilization of silt using a lignin-based bioenergy coproduct. Transportation Research Board 93rd annual meeting Washington DC. No. 14–205.
50. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11929310.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119293 ↗
51. 10.3208/jgssp.v07.01910.3208/jgssp.v07.019 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2020.10343910.1016/j.compgeo.2020.103439 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13883010.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138830 ↗
54. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000295410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002954 ↗
55. 10.1080/14680629.2024.239014710.1080/14680629.2024.2390147 ↗