Machine learning-based models for thermal cracking prediction of flexible pavements
Source abstract
Abstract
Prediction of transverse cracking is crucial for pavement practitioners and decision-makers to prognosticate the cracking development and allocate maintenance budgets. This research investigates thermal crack predictions, using four various machine learning techniques: the support vector regression (SVR), the regression artificial neural network (RNN), the Gaussian process regression (GPR) and the least-square boost ensemble method (LSBoost). Predictions were based on 214 pavement sections with 1262 data points from the Long-Term Pavement Performance (LTPP) database. The models are developed using 20 variables representing age, binder, mix, aggregate and climate properties. The LSBoost ML algorithm exhibited the best performance, with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.926 for training and 0.727 for testing. Sensitivity analysis revealed that pavement age is the predominant factor in transverse crack prediction followed by the freezing index (FI). Overall, climatic parameters played an important role in transverse crack predictions compared to the mix and binder properties.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Concrete Properties and Behavior
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Tanta University
Mansoura University
Incheon National University
Funding
Korea Agency for Infrastructure Technology Advancement · Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jksues.2023.01.00110.1016/j.jksues.2023.01.001 ↗
2. 10.1038/s41598-023-40903-110.1038/s41598-023-40903-1 ↗
3. 10.3390/app1105212610.3390/app11052126 ↗
4. 10.1080/10298436.2021.196839610.1080/10298436.2021.1968396 ↗
5. Anon (n.d.). The MathWorks Inc. (2022). MATLAB version: 9.13.0 (R2022b), Natick, MA: The MathWorks Inc. https://www.mathworks.com
6. 10.1080/10298436.2023.218064110.1080/10298436.2023.2180641 ↗
7. 10.3390/su15191446410.3390/su151914464 ↗
8. 10.1080/14680629.2018.151337210.1080/14680629.2018.1513372 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10430910.1016/j.autcon.2022.104309 ↗
10. 10.1177/036119810619470011610.1177/0361198106194700116 ↗
11. 10.3390/app1103089210.3390/app11030892 ↗
12. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102969710.1080/14680629.2015.1029697 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.16210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.162 ↗
14. 10.1061/9780784482476.00410.1061/9780784482476.004 ↗
15. 10.1214/aos/101320345110.1214/aos/1013203451 ↗
16. 10.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-210.1016/S0167-9473(01)00065-2 ↗
17. 10.1007/s42947-021-00037-x10.1007/s42947-021-00037-x ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.19810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.198 ↗
19. 10.1007/s12205-014-0255-210.1007/s12205-014-0255-2 ↗
20. 10.1088/1755-1315/1026/1/01200710.1088/1755-1315/1026/1/012007 ↗
21. 10.1080/15732479.2019.158123010.1080/15732479.2019.1581230 ↗
22. 10.3390/su1309524810.3390/su13095248 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10600710.1016/j.engappai.2023.106007 ↗
24. 10.1080/14680629.2024.237322210.1080/14680629.2024.2373222 ↗
25. 10.1109/SACI58269.2023.1015857710.1109/SACI58269.2023.10158577 ↗
26. Khattak M. J. & Bhuyan M. R. U. K. (2023). Performance evaluation of chip seal treatment on flexible pavements. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology. Retrieved July 24 2023 from https://link.springer.com/10.1007s42947-023-00305-y
27. Kotu, V., & Deshpande, B. (2015). Chapter 2 – data mining process. In V. Kotu & B. Deshpande (Eds.), Predictive analytics and data mining concepts and practice with rapidminer [online] (pp. 17–36). Elsevier Inc. Retrieved October 16, 2023, from https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/B9780128014608000021
28. 10.1016/j.measurement.2018.11.08110.1016/j.measurement.2018.11.081 ↗
29. 10.1080/10298436.2021.192645810.1080/10298436.2021.1926458 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.rineng.2022.10065710.1016/j.rineng.2022.100657 ↗
31. Pellinin, T. (2001). Investigation of the use of dynamic modulus as an indicator of hot-mix asphalt peformance. Arizona State University.
32. 10.3390/su1415902010.3390/su14159020 ↗
33. 10.18400/tekderg.47660610.18400/tekderg.476606 ↗
34. Radwan M. M. Abo-Hashema M. A. Hashem M. D. & Faheem B. (n.d.). Development of distress prediction models for flexible pavements using LTPP for main roads in Egypt.
35. 10.3390/infrastructures708010010.3390/infrastructures7080100 ↗
36. 10.3390/su1512961710.3390/su15129617 ↗
37. Snieder E. Abogadil K. & Khan U. T. (2020). Resampling and ensemble techniques for improving ANN-based high streamflow forecast accuracy [online]. Urban Hydrology/Modelling approaches. preprint. Retrieved October 2 2023 from https://hess.copernicus.org/preprints/hess-2020-430/hess-2020-430.pdf10.5194/hess-2020-430 ↗
38. 10.1088/1757-899X/1203/3/03203410.1088/1757-899X/1203/3/032034 ↗
39. Titus-Glover L. Darter M. I. & Von Quintus H. (2019). Impact of environmental factors on pavement performance in the absence of heavy loads [online]. Final Report No. FHWA-HRT-16-084. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/40082
40. Titus-Glover L. Rao C. & Sadasivam S. (2020). Local calibration of the pavement ME for Missouri. Final Report TR201609.
41. 10.47481/jscmt.113684810.47481/jscmt.1136848 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.ress.2018.04.00710.1016/j.ress.2018.04.007 ↗
43. 10.1002/pamm.20220026210.1002/pamm.202200262 ↗
44. Wang J. (2022). An intuitive tutorial to gaussian processes regression. Retrieved October 2 2023 from http://arxiv.org/abs/2009.10862
45. 10.1155/2020/753497010.1155/2020/7534970 ↗
46. 10.1177/036119819615400010310.1177/0361198196154000103 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12895510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128955 ↗
48. 10.1080/10298436.2015.110537310.1080/10298436.2015.1105373 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.trc.2015.02.01910.1016/j.trc.2015.02.019 ↗
50. 10.3141/2589-1510.3141/2589-15 ↗