Evaluation of pavement resilience to flooding with inverted pavement structure
Source abstract
Abstract
Conventional pavement structures are vulnerable due to degradation of unbound materials after water inundation. Inverted pavement structure has been proven to be cost-effective and energy efficient, while its resilience has not been investigated. This study is aimed at assessing the resilience of inverted pavements to flooding events using an integrated hydraulic and mechanical modelling approach. Two-dimensional hydraulic models were established to analyse flooding-induced moisture variations in the pavements. Based on the moisture distribution results, three-dimensional mechanical models were developed to calculate critical pavement responses under moving load. The results show that the subgrade with higher groundwater table or larger hydraulic conductivity was more likely to be invaded by water. Compared with conventional pavement, the increases of critical pavement responses in inverted pavement were significantly smaller after long-period flooding, which indicates the potential benefits of inverted pavement in enhancing the resilience to flooding impact.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey
References (49)
Show source-provided references
1. Abd, I. A., Fattah, M. Y., & Mekkiyah, H. (2020). Relationship between the matric suction and the shear strength in unsaturated soil. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 13(1), e00441.10.1016/j.cscm.2020.e00441 ↗
2. Applied Research Associates Inc. (2013). Developing decision support criteria for flood inundated roadways. Report prepared for the Florida Department of Transportation. Toronto Ontario Canada.
3. Ariza P. & Birgisson B. (2002). Evaluation of water flow though pavement systems. Report No. MN/RC - 2002-30 Minnesota Department of Transportation St. Paul MN.
4. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.10046810.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100468 ↗
5. 10.1007/s10706-013-9674-y10.1007/s10706-013-9674-y ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13177710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131777 ↗
7. 10.3390/soilsystems602005210.3390/soilsystems6020052 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2023.10099210.1016/j.trgeo.2023.100992 ↗
9. 10.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-135310.1061/JPEODX.PVENG-1353 ↗
10. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000047210.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000472 ↗
11. 10.1080/10298436.2014.93771210.1080/10298436.2014.937712 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2018.06.00210.1016/j.trgeo.2018.06.002 ↗
13. 10.5703/128828431420810.5703/1288284314208 ↗
14. Ismail, M. S. N., & Ghani, A. N. A. (2017). An overview of road damages due to flooding: Case study in Kedah state, Malaysia. AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1892, No. 1, October190001). AIP Publishing LLC.
15. Jiang X. Huang B. Titi H. & Polaczyk P. (2022). Evaluating the performance of inverted pavements in Tennessee (No. RES 2020-12).10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128489 ↗
16. Kelly, P. F. (2014). Elements of mechanics. CRC Press.
17. 10.3141/2639-0110.3141/2639-01 ↗
18. Lewis, D. E., Ledford, K., Georges, T., & Jared, D. M. (2012, January). Construction and performance of inverted pavements in Georgia. 91st Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
19. 10.1061/JPEODX.000004410.1061/JPEODX.0000044 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.09610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.096 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.06110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.061 ↗
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000152410.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0001524 ↗
23. Lytton R. L. Luo X. Saha S. Chen Y. Deng Y. Gu F. & Ling M. (2019). Proposed Enhancements to pavement ME design: Improved consideration of the influence of subgrade and unbound layers on pavement performance. NCHRP Report No. 1-53 Transportation Research Board Washington DC.
24. 10.1177/0361198121106155710.1177/03611981211061557 ↗
25. 10.1177/0361198122107798410.1177/03611981221077984 ↗
26. 10.1061/JPEODX.000035210.1061/JPEODX.0000352 ↗
27. McCartney J. S. Selvam R. P. King J. & Khosravi A. (2010). Evaluation of the enhanced integrated climatic model for the Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department (No. TRC-0902).
28. Papadopoulos E. (2014). Performance of unbound aggregate bases and implications for inverted base pavements [Doctoral dissertation]. Georgia Institute of Technology. https://repository.gatech.edu/entities/publication/837cea8a-9f9c-488e-af89-0083c31d3e31/full.
29. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.10341310.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103413 ↗
30. 10.1063/1.174501010.1063/1.1745010 ↗
31. Salour F. & Erlingsson S. (2014). Impact of groundwater level on the mechanical response of a flexible pavement structure: A case study at the Torpsbruk test section along county road 126 using Falling Weight Deflectometer. Report No. 808A. Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI) Linköping.
32. 10.1177/036119811989905610.1177/0361198119899056 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13477010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.134770 ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.000041310.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000413 ↗
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000087310.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000873 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.ijtst.2019.09.00510.1016/j.ijtst.2019.09.005 ↗
37. Technical Recommendations for Highways (TRH). (1996). Structural design of flexible pavements for interurban and rural roads. Department of Transport Republic of South Africa Pretoria South Africa.
38. 10.17226/2246910.17226/22469 ↗
39. 10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x10.2136/sssaj1980.03615995004400050002x ↗
40. 10.5194/nhess-10-793-201010.5194/nhess-10-793-2010 ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.000024510.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000245 ↗
42. 10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.000046510.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000465 ↗
43. 10.3141/2524-1210.3141/2524-12 ↗
44. 10.1061/JPEODX.000019810.1061/JPEODX.0000198 ↗
45. Weingart, R. (2012, January). Inverted base: The Virginia experience. 91st Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington, D.C.
46. Witczak M. W. Zapata C. E. & Houston W. N. (2006). Models incorporated into the current enhanced integrated climatic model for used in version 1.0 of the MEPDG. NCHRP 9-23 Project Report. Arizona State University Tempe.
47. 10.3141/2101-0710.3141/2101-07 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.trd.2022.10339510.1016/j.trd.2022.103395 ↗
49. 10.1002/vzj2.2006510.1002/vzj2.20065 ↗