Rheological, permanent deformation and fatigue analysis for calibration of the recovery process of bitumens in the rotary evaporator
Source abstract
Abstract
The extraction and recovery of bitumens from bituminous mixtures is an important procedure in the paving industry. This work achieves to evaluate the rheological, permanent deformation and fatigue tests to calibration of the recovery procedure in the rotary evaporator. The protocol was divided in bitumens of known properties with laboratory aging and bitumens of unknown properties subjected to field aging. The materials were subjected to different distillation times and tested chemically, rheologically and for damage by fatigue and permanent deformation. The results indicated that the chemical FTIR test was not sensitive in capturing the presence of residual solvent in the bituminous materials due to low concentrations after recovery. The joint analysis of the |G*|, Jnr at 3.2 kPa of the MSCR and the Nf of the LAS test were consistent for determining the distillation times in the rotary evaporator to result in the absence of residual solvent and additional aging.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · High voltage insulation and dielectric phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Federal University of Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Brazil
Dynatest Latam y Caribe, São Paulo, Brazil
References (83)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/JPEODX.000009610.1061/JPEODX.0000096 ↗
2. 10.1080/102984304200019856810.1080/1029843042000198568 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.013 ↗
4. 10.14295/transportes.v26i2.140710.14295/transportes.v26i2.1407 ↗
5. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO M 320-17). (2017). Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder.
6. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO M 332-19). (2019). Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder using multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test.
7. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO T 315-20). (2020). Standard method of test for determining the rheological properties of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR).
8. American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM D 2172). (2017). Standard test methods for quantitative extraction of asphalt binder from asphalt mixtures.
9. American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM D 2726). (2019). Standard test method for bulk specific gravity and density of Non-absorptive compacted asphalt mixtures.
10. American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM D 2872). (2019). Standard test method for effect of heat and Air on a moving film of asphalt (rolling thin-film oven test).
11. American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM D 5404). (2017). Standard practice for recovery of asphalt from solution using the rotary evaporator.
12. American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM D 7405). (2020). Standard test method for multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer.
13. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas (ABNT NBR 6560). (2016). Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas, 2016. ABNT NBR 6560 – Ligantes asfálticos – determinação do ponto de amolecimento – método do anel e bola. Associação Brasileira de Normas Técnicas.
14. 10.1080/14680629.2018.141871510.1080/14680629.2018.1418715 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.20910.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.209 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.10.04910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.10.049 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.27310.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.273 ↗
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000119810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001198 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12731610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127316 ↗
20. BS EN 12697-3. (2018). Bituminous mixtures. Test methods. Bitumen recovery: Rotary evaporator.
21. Burr, B. L., Davison, R. R., Glover, C. J., & Bullin, J. A. (1990). Solvent removal from asphalt. Transportation Research Record, (1269), 1–8.
22. Burr, B. L., Davison, R. R., Jemison, H. B., Glover, C. J., & Bullin, J. A. (1991). Asphalt hardening in extraction solvents. Transportation Research Record, (1323), 1–8.
23. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138907810.1080/14680629.2017.1389078 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.12510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.125 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.02810.1016/j.ijfatigue.2018.09.028 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.06910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.069 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.30510.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.305 ↗
28. 10.1080/14680629.2004.968999210.1080/14680629.2004.9689992 ↗
29. Diefenderfer S. D. (2014). Developing a laboratory protocol for asphalt binder recovery (Report No. FHWA/VCRIR 15-R7). Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research.
30. DNER ME 382. (1999). Material asfáltico – Determinação da recuperação elástica de materiais asfálticos modificados por polímero pelo método do ductilômetro.
31. DNIT ME 136. (2018). Misturas asfálticas – Determinação da resistência à tração por compressão diametral.
32. DNIT ME 155. (2010). Material asfáltico – Determinação da penetração – Método de ensaio.
33. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126674010.1080/14680629.2016.1266740 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.16410.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.164 ↗
35. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000354010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0003540 ↗
36. 10.1080/14680629.2020.184578510.1080/14680629.2020.1845785 ↗
37. 10.1080/14680629.2017.130423410.1080/14680629.2017.1304234 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11949010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119490 ↗
39. Hossain Z. Solanki P. Zaman M. Adje D. & Lewis S. (2012). Test methods for use of recycled asphalt pavement in asphalt mixes College of Engineering (Report No. FHWA-OK-12-01). University of Oklahoma OK.
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.11710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.10.117 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.08110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.081 ↗
42. 10.1080/10298436.2019.165460910.1080/10298436.2019.1654609 ↗
43. Kaloush K. E. Shane Underwood B. Salim R. & Gundla A. (2019). Evaluation of MSCR testing for adoption in ADOT asphalt binder specifications. SPR 742. Arizona Department of Transportation.
44. 10.1016/j.cis.2008.08.01110.1016/j.cis.2008.08.011 ↗
45. 10.1080/14680629.2016.121350910.1080/14680629.2016.1213509 ↗
46. 10.1080/14680629.2019.164376910.1080/14680629.2019.1643769 ↗
47. McDaniel R. S. Soleymani H. Anderson R. M. Turner P. & Peterson R. (2000). Recommended use of reclaimed asphalt pavement in the superpave mix design method (Report No. D 9–12). National Cooperative Highway Research Program.
48. 10.1007/s42947-019-0081-510.1007/s42947-019-0081-5 ↗
49. Mikhailenko P. & Baaj H. (2017). Survey of current asphalt binder extraction and recovery practices [Paper presentation]. 2017 transportation Association of Canada Conference. Canada.
50. 10.1080/14680629.2019.166127710.1080/14680629.2019.1661277 ↗
51. 10.1080/14680629.2018.141871710.1080/14680629.2018.1418717 ↗
52. 10.1080/10298436.2015.110385110.1080/10298436.2015.1103851 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.06910.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.069 ↗
54. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000196010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001960 ↗
55. 10.1080/10298436.2015.109590910.1080/10298436.2015.1095909 ↗
56. Nosler I. Tanghe T. & Soenen H. (2008). Evaluation of binder recovery methods and the influence on the properties of polymer modified bitumen. In 4th Eurasphalt and Eurobitume Congress Belgium.
57. Peterson, R. L., Soleymani, H. R., Anderson, R. M., & McDaniel, R. S. (2000). Recovery and testing of RAP binders from recycled asphalt pavements. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proceedings, 69, 72–91.
58. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12676310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.126763 ↗
59. 10.1080/14680629.2019.166324410.1080/14680629.2019.1663244 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12065110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120651 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.19710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.197 ↗
62. 10.1080/14680629.2019.163378210.1080/14680629.2019.1633782 ↗
63. Rodezno C. & Julian G. (2018). Asphalt binder extraction protocol for determining amount & PG characteristics of binders recovered from asphalt mixtures (Report No. WHRP 0092-16-02). National Center for Asphalt Technology at Auburn University.
64. 10.1080/14680629.2020.176485810.1080/14680629.2020.1764858 ↗
65. Safaei F. (2017). Characterization and modeling of asphalt binder fatigue [Doctoral dissertation]. North Carolina State University North Carolina.
66. 10.3141/2574-0110.3141/2574-01 ↗
67. 10.1007/s11043-016-9304-110.1007/s11043-016-9304-1 ↗
68. 10.1177/036119811984991510.1177/0361198119849915 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12030910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120309 ↗
70. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138909410.1080/14680629.2017.1389094 ↗
71. 10.1061/JPEODX.000013710.1061/JPEODX.0000137 ↗
72. 10.1007/s00397-016-0919-610.1007/s00397-016-0919-6 ↗
73. 10.3390/su1113375210.3390/su11133752 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.16910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.169 ↗
75. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000169710.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001697 ↗
76. Wakefield A. Anderson R. M. McKay Z. & Tighe S. L. (2018). A review of solvent extraction-recovery procedures and their effect on recovered asphalt binder properties. Canadian Technical Asphalt Association Conference.
77. 10.1080/14680629.2019.159405310.1080/14680629.2019.1594053 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11767910.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117679 ↗
79. 10.1080/14680629.2018.156138110.1080/14680629.2018.1561381 ↗
80. 10.3390/ma1209150810.3390/ma12091508 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.06110.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.06.061 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.11910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.119 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.02210.1016/j.jclepro.2017.05.022 ↗