Investigation of abrasion resistance of geopolymer concrete cured in ambient temperature for pavement applications
Source abstract
Abstract
AbstractThe viability of eco-friendly geopolymer concrete (GPC) for engineering applications such as pavements requires investigating the abrasion resistance and understanding the improving mechanisms. The produced one-part GPC can be used in various engineering applications showing a 28-day compressive strength between 25–42 MPa and flexural strength above 4.5 MPa. GPC slabs, compared to ordinary Portland cement-based concrete (OPCC), generally experienced higher abrasion. While the abrasion of the OPCC specimen in 28 days was 2.72 mm, the GPC specimens experienced an abrasion between 3.60 and 4.11 mm. The dominance of slag and increasing water content increased the abrasion. It is concluded that the strong connection between microstructural behaviour and macrostructural properties is the key element in GPC performance. Hence, it is recommended that careful attention be paid to the refinement of the microstructure in order to find a GPC that is viable and suitable for pavement and road applications.KEYWORDS: Geopolymer concretesustainable constructionabrasion resistancepermeabilityambient temperature curing Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by Australian Research Council Discovery Grant: [Grant Number DP170100425].
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete Corrosion and Durability
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Centre for Sustainable Infrastructure and Digital Construction, School of Engineering, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia
Funding
Australian Research Council Discovery Grant
References (87)
Show source-provided references
1. ACI Committee 318. (2019). Building code requirements for structural concrete and commentary (ACI 318-19). American Concrete Institute.
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12032010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120320 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.05610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.056 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12185710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121857 ↗
5. 10.5194/essd-10-195-201810.5194/essd-10-195-2018 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.08310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.083 ↗
7. ASTM International. (2013). Astm C642-13, standard test method for density, absorption, and voids in hardened concrete.
8. ASTM International. (2016a). Astm C293 / C293M-16, standard test method for flexural strength of concrete (using simple beam With center-point loading).
9. ASTM International. (2016b). Astm C597-16, standard test method for pulse velocity through concrete.
10. ASTM International. (2021). Astm C39 / C39M-21, standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens.
11. 10.1080/14680629.2021.192631110.1080/14680629.2021.1926311 ↗
12. 10.1080/14680629.2021.201223610.1080/14680629.2021.2012236 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2013.12.00310.1016/j.cemconres.2013.12.003 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10406010.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104060 ↗
15. British Standards Institution. (2002). BS EN 13892-4: 2002 methods of test for screed materials determination of wear resistance-BCA. British Standars Institution.
16. 10.1021/ja01269a02310.1021/ja01269a023 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12256610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122566 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.02910.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.029 ↗
19. Davidovits, J. (1999). Chemistry of geopolymeric systems, terminology. In International conference on geopolymers (pp. 9–40). Cordi Geopolymers SARL.
20. 10.14359/5168249510.14359/51682495 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11761110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117611 ↗
22. 10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z10.1007/s10853-006-0637-z ↗
23. 10.14359/1526110.14359/15261 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000191610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001916 ↗
25. Hardjito D. & Rangan B. V. (2005). D evelopment and properties of low-calcium fly ash-based geopolymer concrete (http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/5594)
26. 10.3390/ma1415416010.3390/ma14154160 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.22410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.224 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.28910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.289 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.10610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.07.106 ↗
30. 10.1007/BF0247274410.1007/BF02472744 ↗
31. Kosmatka S. H. (2006). Bleed water. Significance of tests and properties of concrete and concrete-making materials 99.10.1520/STP37730S ↗
32. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1991)3:1(19)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1991)3:1(19) ↗
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12038110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120381 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2017.10.00110.1016/j.cemconres.2017.10.001 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11735410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117354 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.06010.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.060 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.12510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.125 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.06610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.066 ↗
39. 10.1039/C4RA03375B10.1039/C4RA03375B ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12478710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124787 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e0225510.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02255 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12819010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128190 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.12810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.128 ↗
44. Müller N. & Harnisch J. (2008). A blueprint for a climate-friendly cement industry: How to turn around the trend of cement related emissions in the developing world. W. W. F. f. Nature. https://wwfeu.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/cement_blueprint_climate_fullenglrep_lr.pdf
45. 10.1021/la400047310.1021/la4000473 ↗
46. 10.1016/0140-6701(96)82080-710.1016/0140-6701(96)82080-7 ↗
47. Nath, P. (2014). Study of fly ash based geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition. Curtin University.
48. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.08010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.03410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.034 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.10414110.1016/j.cemconcomp.2021.104141 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2014.12.15410.1016/j.ceramint.2014.12.154 ↗
52. 10.11648/j.am.20180702.1110.11648/j.am.20180702.11 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.02410.1016/j.matdes.2015.03.024 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.21010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.210 ↗
55. 10.1007/s10098-021-02085-010.1007/s10098-021-02085-0 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12071310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120713 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.20910.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.209 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2012.03.00410.1016/j.cemconres.2012.03.004 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12182210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121822 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.23010.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.230 ↗
61. 10.1080/14680629.2020.184578310.1080/14680629.2020.1845783 ↗
62. 10.1007/s11595-011-0182-810.1007/s11595-011-0182-8 ↗
63. 10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01000-110.1016/S0008-8846(02)01000-1 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.trd.2022.10343610.1016/j.trd.2022.103436 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.00810.1016/j.cemconres.2006.10.008 ↗
66. Standards Australia. (2010). AS 3972-2010: General purpose and blended cement. Sai Global Limited.
67. Standards Australia. (2014). AS 2758.1-2014: Aggregates and rock for engineering purposes- concrete aggregates.
68. Standards Australia. (2016a). AS 3582.1-2016: Supplementary cementitious materials- fly ash.
69. Standards Australia. (2016b). AS 3582.2-2016: Supplementary cementitious materials- slag.
70. Standards Australia. (2018). AS 3600: Concrete structure.
71. 10.1080/14680629.2021.195938510.1080/14680629.2021.1959385 ↗
72. 10.1617/s11527-017-1103-x10.1617/s11527-017-1103-x ↗
73. Tennakoon, C. K. (2016). Assessment of properties of ambient cured geopolymer concrete for construction applications. Swinburne Universitry of Technology].
74. Turk K. & Karatas M. (2011). Abrasion resistance and mechanical properties of self-compacting concrete with different dosages of fly ash/silica fume.
75. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.02310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.01.023 ↗
76. Un, C. H. (2017). Creep behaviour of geopolymer concrete. Swinburne University of Technology].
77. U.S. Geological Survey. (2021). M ineral commodity summaries 2021 (Report). U. S. G. Survey. http://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/70194932
78. 10.1016/0008-8846(95)00139-410.1016/0008-8846(95)00139-4 ↗
79. 10.1142/S0218348X2140003X10.1142/S0218348X2140003X ↗
80. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.05810.1016/j.compositesb.2017.07.058 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.15310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.153 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12005610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120056 ↗
83. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.19110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.01.191 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.00110.1016/j.jclepro.2012.08.001 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.05110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.06.051 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.29010.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.290 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.trd.2021.10274910.1016/j.trd.2021.102749 ↗