journal article·2022-02-01

Evaluating fatigue performance of fine aggregate matrix mixes with reclaimed asphalt pavement and rejuvenating agents

Liya Jiao, Mohamed Elkashef, David Jones, John T. Harvey

Publisher page

Abstract

In this study, the fatigue performance of asphalt mixtures with high reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) content and rejuvenating agents (RA) has been investigated at the level of fine aggregate matrix (FAM) mix. Fatigue tests were conducted on four mixes: FAM without RAP, FAM with 25% RAP binder replacement, FAM with 25% RAP and two types of rejuvenators. Both the linear amplitude sweep (LAS) and conventional time sweep fatigue testing were used. The comparison between mixes with RAP and without RAP indicated that the addition of RAP results in a higher stiffness and faster damage rate as expected. Adding rejuvenators to the FAM mixes with RAP did not cause an appreciable reduction of stiffness. The incorporation of rejuvenators may improve the damage resistance and extend the fatigue life of FAM mixes with RAP; however, they were still inferior to the virgin FAM mix without RAP in terms of cracking resistance.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Concrete and Cement Materials Research

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

University of California Pavement Research Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA, USA

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000000410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000004 ↗
2. Bahia H. U. · 2001
3. 10.1007/BF0248162010.1007/BF02481620 ↗
4. 10.3141/2057-1810.3141/2057-18 ↗
5. Brown E. R. · 1984
6. Carpenter S. H. · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · 1980 · 777 · 15
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.03210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.032 ↗
8. Copeland A. · 2011
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.19510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.195 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.09910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.099 ↗
11. Elseifi M. A. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2011 · 80 · 227
12. Epps J. A. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1980 · 49 · 144
13. 10.3141/2507-1310.3141/2507-13 ↗
14. 10.3141/2371-0210.3141/2371-02 ↗
15. 10.1115/1.316708110.1115/1.3167081 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.07410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.074 ↗
17. 10.3141/2207-1310.3141/2207-13 ↗
18. 10.1080/10298436.2015.106600210.1080/10298436.2015.1066002 ↗
19. 10.3141/2507-0110.3141/2507-01 ↗
20. Kim Y. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2006 · 75 · 755
21. Masad E. A. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2006 · 75 · 713
22. 10.1080/14680629.2012.65707010.1080/14680629.2012.657070 ↗
23. Pell, P. S. (1962). Fatigue characteristics of bitumen and bituminous mixes. Proceedings of International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavements (Vol. 203, pp. 43–58). TRB.
24. Reese R. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1997 · 66 · 604
25. Rowe, G. M. & Bouldin, M. G. (2000). Improved techniques to evaluate the fatigue resistance of asphaltic mixtures. Proceedings of 2nd Eurasphalt & Eurobitume Congress 2000 (pp. 1–8).
26. 10.1080/14680629.2017.130425010.1080/14680629.2017.1304250 ↗
27. 10.1007/BF0114083710.1007/BF01140837 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.03.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.03.006 ↗
29. 10.3141/1681-1410.3141/1681-14 ↗
30. 10.1617/s11527-014-0332-510.1617/s11527-014-0332-5 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.07310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.073 ↗