Investigation of the usability of aggregates produced from sea shell in SMA pavements with different addition methods
Source abstract
Abstract
The usability of waste seashell aggregates instead of basalt aggregate in stone mastic asphalt (SMA) mixtures was investigated. Maximum size of the seashell aggregates were choosen as 0.425 mm, 0.180 mm, and 0.075 mm. The rate of seashell aggregate was applied as 5%. In addition, the effects of the methods of adding seashell fillers to basalt aggregate by dry aggregate method, moist aggregate method, and slurry method were investigated. The use of seashell aggregates has been found to increase the stability, low temperature cracking resistance, water damage resistance, and deformation resistance of SMA mixtures. It was found that with the reduction of the seashell aggregate size, the improvement in the mechanical properties of the mixture increased, and the best properties were obtained with the use of seashell in filler size. When evaluated in terms of filler addition methods, the moist aggregate method gives better results than the slurry method and dry aggregate method.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Materials Engineering and Processing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Architecture, Batman University, Batman, Turkey
Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Technology, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey
References (26)
Show source-provided references
1. Ahmed I. · 1993
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.05.00310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.05.003 ↗
3. 10.1080/10298436.2014.94313210.1080/10298436.2014.943132 ↗
4. Atud T. J. · 2007
5. Blazejowski K. · 2011
6. 10.1061/9780784412442.33910.1061/9780784412442.339 ↗
7. Ekici Ö · Bilim ve Teknik · 2012 · 45 · 36
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000006410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000064 ↗
9. Iowa Department of Transportation. (2019). Moisture sensitivity testing of asphalt mixtures. Matls IM 319. Retrieved July 21, 2019. https://www.iowadot.gov/erl/current/IM/content/319.htm
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.01910.1016/j.compositesb.2013.05.019 ↗
11. 10.18400/tekderg.68634610.18400/tekderg.686346 ↗
12. KGM. (2013). Karayolları Teknik Şartnamesi-2013, Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
13. Little D. N. · 2006
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:2(207)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:2(207) ↗
15. Lottman R. P. · 1982
16. Orhan, F. (2012). Bitümlü Karışımlar Laboratuvarı Çalışmaları, Karayolları Genel Müdürlüğü Araştırma Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı Üstyapı Geliştirme Şubesi Müdürlüğü, Ankara.
17. Petersen J. C. · 1987
18. Roberts F. L. · 1996
19. Ruiz G. · International Journal of Pavement Engineering · 2020 · 21(5), 620
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.00910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.01.009 ↗
21. Shidhore, A. V. (2005). Use of lime as anti-strip additive for mitigating moisture susceptibility of asphalt mixes containing baghouse fines [Master’s thesis]. North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, https://repository.lib.ncsu.edu/handle/1840.16/412
22. TOB. (2020). Su Ürünleri İstatistikleri, Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, Ankara.
23. Tran J. · 2009 · 1
24. 10.1177/0734242X030210020210.1177/0734242X0302100202 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.04410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.044 ↗
26. Yıldız Z B. · 2019