journal article·2025-09-02

Investigations on rutting potential and performance specifications for Marshall designed bituminous mixtures

Sadiya Shaikh, Ankit Gupta, Nikhil Saboo

Publisher page

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of various design factors and volumetric parameters on the rutting performance of bituminous mixtures. A dynamic creep test was performed using the dynamic testing system to evaluate the rutting resistance. The test results showed that higher rutting resistance can be achieved using a higher nominal maximum size of the aggregate (NMAS), coarser gradation, modified binder and increased compaction effort. Also, it was found that among the different volumetric parameters, higher Gmb and VFA contribute to lower permanent strain (%) while increased air void and VMA correlate with higher permanent strain (%). Additionally, linear regression models were developed to predict permanent strain (%) based on the design factors and volumetric properties considered in the study. Furthermore, the present study establishes and validates the threshold values of permanent strain for the selection of rut-resistant bituminous mixtures.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical and construction materials studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Indian Institute of Technology (BHU) Varanasi

Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

Funding

National Highways Authority of India

References (90)

Show source-provided references
1. Afaf, M. (2014). Effect of aggregate gradation and type on hot asphalt concrete mix properties. JES Journal of Engineering Sciences, 42(4), 567–574.
2. Ahlrich R. C. (1996). 19960221 M. technical report GL-96-1.
3. 10.4236/wjet.2016.4304810.4236/wjet.2016.43048 ↗
4. 10.1080/10298436.2016.122441410.1080/10298436.2016.1224414 ↗
5. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126172210.1080/14680629.2016.1261722 ↗
6. 10.1088/1757-899X/745/1/01211410.1088/1757-899X/745/1/012114 ↗
7. Aodah H. H. Kareem Y. N. A. & Chandra S. (2012). Effect of aggregate gradation on moisture susceptibility and creep in HMA. December (pp. 767–772).
8. Barksdale. (1973). Rutting of pavement materials.
9. Barry M. K. (2016). An analysis of Impact factors on the Illinois flexibility index test (Master’s thesis).
10. Brown, E. R., & Bassett, C. E. (1990). Effects of maximum aggregate size on rutting potential and other properties of asphalt-aggregate mixtures. Transportation Research Record, 1259, 107–119.
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2010)136:1(31)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2010)136:1(31) ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.10594710.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105947 ↗
13. 10.1080/14680629.2021.190569810.1080/14680629.2021.1905698 ↗
14. Christensen D. W. & Bonaquist R. F. (2006). NCHRP report 567 – Volumetric requirements for superpave mix design.
15. Coleri E. Shashwath S. & Obaid I. A. (2020). Development of a balanced mix design method in Oregon (final report PROJECT SPR 801) FHWA-OR-RD-21-03.
16. Cross S. A. & Brown E. R. (1992). Selection of aggregate properties to minimize rutting of heavy-duty pavements in Meininger. ASTM STP 1147.10.1520/STP24211S ↗
17. 10.1177/036119811882373210.1177/0361198118823732 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.17610.1016/j.matpr.2019.09.176 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11994110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119941 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.12.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.12.001 ↗
21. 10.1007/s12205-014-1356-710.1007/s12205-014-1356-7 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.04810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.05.048 ↗
23. 10.3141/1767-1910.3141/1767-19 ↗
24. 10.3141/1543-0510.3141/1543-05 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.07910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.079 ↗
26. Hislop W. P. & Coree B. J. (2000). VMA as a design parameter in hot-mix asphalt. Mid-Content Transportation Symposium 2000 Proceedings (pp. 24–29).
27. 10.1515/jmbm-2018-200710.1515/jmbm-2018-2007 ↗
28. 10.3390/app1020714510.3390/app10207145 ↗
29. Hwang, S.-D., Yoon, A.-S., & Kim, B.-I. (2004). Improvement of Marshall mix design and comparative evaluation with current Marshall mix design method. Journal of the Korean Society of Road Engineers, 6, 13–24.
30. Irc:sp:135-2022. (2022.
31. IS:1201-1220. (1978). Indian standard methods for testing tar and bituminous materials. Bureau of Indian Standards 1st Revision.
32. IS 15462-2019. (2019). IS 15462-2019 Polymer Modified Bitumen (PMB) specification. In Bureau of Indian Standards.
33. IS:2386 (Part I). (1963). Method of test for aggregate for concrete (Particle size and shape). Indian Standards (Reaffirmed 2002).
34. IS 2386- Part III. (1963). Method of test for aggregate for concrete. Part III – Specific gravity density voids absorption and bulking. Bureau of Indian Standards New Delhi (Reaffirmed 2002).
35. IS: 2386 (Part IV). (2016). Methods of test for aggregates for concrete part 4: Mechanical properties. Bureau of Indian Standards New Delhi (pp. 1–37).
36. IS-73. (2013). Indian standard paving bitumen. Indian Standards Institution.
37. Kandhal P. S. & Mallick R. B. (1999). Evaluation of asphalt pavement analyzer for HMA mix design. NCAT Report 99-04 99.
38. 10.3141/1767-1810.3141/1767-18 ↗
39. 10.1080/10298436.2011.56505810.1080/10298436.2011.565058 ↗
40. Kennedy T. W. Roberts F. L. & Anagnos J. N. (1984). Patl.’. 2.
41. 10.1080/1029843090357896010.1080/10298430903578960 ↗
42. 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2008)20:10(659)10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2008)20:10(659) ↗
43. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000213910.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002139 ↗
44. 10.1080/10298436.2022.214431210.1080/10298436.2022.2144312 ↗
45. 10.1080/14680629.2024.233520510.1080/14680629.2024.2335205 ↗
46. 10.3390/ma1514486610.3390/ma15144866 ↗
47. 10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2009)21:6(262)10.1061/(asce)0899-1561(2009)21:6(262) ↗
48. 10.1080/14680629.2019.168306110.1080/14680629.2019.1683061 ↗
49. 10.1080/10298436.2014.93771310.1080/10298436.2014.937713 ↗
50. 10.17226/2356410.17226/23564 ↗
51. 10.1061/9780784480090.01110.1061/9780784480090.011 ↗
52. 10.5897/SRE10.94610.5897/SRE10.946 ↗
53. MORT&H Guidelines. (2013). Specifications for road and bridge works for state road authorities Fifth Revision. 448.
54. 10.1007/s40999-021-00614-y10.1007/s40999-021-00614-y ↗
55. MS-2 7th Edition Asphalt Mix Design Methods. (2009). Asphalt Institute 197.
56. 10.1080/14680629.2019.166375410.1080/14680629.2019.1663754 ↗
57. 10.3141/1789-1510.3141/1789-15 ↗
58. 10.1080/14680629.2017.137499410.1080/14680629.2017.1374994 ↗
59. 10.1080/10298436.2018.151787510.1080/10298436.2018.1517875 ↗
60. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000452410.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0004524 ↗
61. 10.1177/0361198122108254710.1177/03611981221082547 ↗
62. 10.1080/10298436.2012.75282410.1080/10298436.2012.752824 ↗
63. 10.1007/s12205-015-0265-810.1007/s12205-015-0265-8 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13834910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.138349 ↗
65. 10.1177/0361198124127556710.1177/03611981241275567 ↗
66. 10.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-1776010.1061/JMCEE7.MTENG-17760 ↗
67. 10.1038/s41598-024-75196-510.1038/s41598-024-75196-5 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13600510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136005 ↗
69. 10.1080/14680629.2023.218101710.1080/14680629.2023.2181017 ↗
70. Sobhan, M. A., Mofiz, S. A., & Rasel, H. M. (2007). Effect of gradation and compactive effort on the properties of dense bituminous macadam mixes. Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 66(1), 56–59.
71. Sousa J. Craus J. & Monismith C. (1991). Summary report on permanent deformation in asphalt concrete. National Research Council. http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=350771.
72. 10.1080/14680629.2023.218029610.1080/14680629.2023.2180296 ↗
73. Specifications for Dense Graded Bituminous Mixes. (2009.
74. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000250610.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002506 ↗
75. Sreedhar S. Engineering C. Specifications D. P. Life F. & Pavements A. (2019). An abstract of the dissertation of.
76. 10.1080/1029843031000159326310.1080/10298430310001593263 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.014 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.17110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.171 ↗
79. Varma S. Sebaaly H. Maina J. & Ghbani A. (2019). Experimental investigation of Marshall and superpave mix design methods for rutting criteria.
80. Wahhab, H. A.-A. (1991). Evaluation of Marshall and Hveem mix design procedures for local use. Transport Research Record, 1317, 68–76. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/Onlinepubs/trr/1991/1317/1317-008.pdf.
81. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.19810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.198 ↗
82. 10.1080/14680629.2023.218099210.1080/14680629.2023.2180992 ↗
83. 10.3141/2575-1110.3141/2575-11 ↗
84. West R. Rodezno C. Leiva F. & Yin F. (2018). Development of a framework for balanced mix design. Project NCHRP 20-07/Task 406 7–20.
85. Williams S. G. (2003). The Effects of HMA mixture characteristics on rutting susceptibility by Transportation Research Board 7639(November 2002).
86. 10.1080/14680629.2020.182089010.1080/14680629.2020.1820890 ↗
87. 10.3141/2446-0110.3141/2446-01 ↗
88. Zaniewski J. P. & Srinivasan G. (2004). Evaluation of indirect tensile strength to identify asphalt concrete rutting potential. 73.
89. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000276710.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002767 ↗
90. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000194610.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001946 ↗