Towards carbon neutrality: a comprehensive review of sustainable materials for asphalt pavement
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper presents a comprehensive examination of sustainable materials and technologies in asphalt pavement construction aimed at achieving carbon neutrality. Through a meticulous review of existing literature, the study explores a diverse range of innovative approaches, including the utilisation of recycled materials, energy-efficient technologies such as warm mix asphalt and cold mix asphalt, and the incorporation of novel materials like carbon black, and snail shell ashes. The review highlights both the challenges and opportunities associated with these sustainable practices, emphasising the necessity for clear standards and specifications to facilitate the widespread adoption of recycled materials in asphalt pavements. Furthermore, the paper underscores the importance of continuous research and development to address environmental concerns and enhance the performance of sustainable pavement technologies. Overall, this review seeks to provide a comprehensive understanding of the current state of asphalt sustainability practices and to inspire further advancements in the field.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Polymer composites and self-healing
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
University of South Alabama
Funding
University of South Alabama
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/su1407417310.3390/su14074173 ↗
2. 10.1088/1742-6596/2129/1/01203910.1088/1742-6596/2129/1/012039 ↗
3. 10.3390/su1509757910.3390/su15097579 ↗
4. 10.3390/en1503120110.3390/en15031201 ↗
5. 10.1155/2023/632049010.1155/2023/6320490 ↗
6. 10.1021/acsami.2c0730110.1021/acsami.2c07301 ↗
7. 10.1617/s11527-014-0492-310.1617/s11527-014-0492-3 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.00110.1016/j.techsoc.2005.10.001 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.02810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.028 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13285810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132858 ↗
11. 10.1002/vnl.2197210.1002/vnl.21972 ↗
12. 10.1021/acs.est.1c0066410.1021/acs.est.1c00664 ↗
13. 10.3390/su13191107710.3390/su131911077 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.000071810.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000718 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.20910.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.209 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11952010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119520 ↗
17. 10.17051/ilkonline.2021.04.25010.17051/ilkonline.2021.04.250 ↗
18. Brander M. (2012). Greenhouse gases: CO2 CO2e and Carbon what do these mean? v2.1. Ecometrica https://ecometrica.com/assets/GHGs-CO2-CO2e-and-Carbon-What-Do-These-Mean-v2.1.pdf
19. 10.3390/infrastructures704004510.3390/infrastructures7040045 ↗
20. Chen, D. H., & Daleiden, J. (2005). Lessons learned from the long-term pavement performance program and several recycled sections in Texas. Transportation Research Circular, 70–84. E-C078. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec078.pdf
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12541110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125411 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.20710.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.207 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.trd.2021.10269710.1016/j.trd.2021.102697 ↗
24. 10.3390/ma1208120010.3390/ma12081200 ↗
25. 10.1155/2021/323522310.1155/2021/3235223 ↗
26. Database Earth. (2023). Population by country 2023. Database Earth. Retrieved July 9 2024 from https://database.earth/population/by-country/2023
27. Davis J. (2008). Using recycled shingles in HMA. Asphalt: The Magazine of the Asphalt Institute. http://asphaltmagazine.com/using-recycled-shingles-in-hma/
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.12610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.07.126 ↗
29. 10.11159/icsenm17.14210.11159/icsenm17.142 ↗
30. Dwivedi, A., & Jain, M. (2014). Fly ash – waste management and overview: A review. Science and Technology, 6(1), 2076–5061. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/236010887.pdf
31. Federal Highway Administration. (2017). Pavement thermal performance and contribution to urban and global climate. U.S. Department of Transportation/Federal Highway Administration < https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/sustainability/articles/pavement_thermal.cfm>
32. Federal Highway Administration. (2022). Improving transportation investment decisions through life-cycle cost analysis. < https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/lcca/lccafact/>
33. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12398010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123980 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.11380410.1016/j.enconman.2020.113804 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.00610.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.006 ↗
36. 10.3390/ma1313297010.3390/ma13132970 ↗
37. GlobalData. (2022). Greenhouse gas emissions in India (2010 - 2021).
38. 10.11113/jt.v73.430510.11113/jt.v73.4305 ↗
39. Harvey J. T. Meijer J. Ozer H. Al-Qadi I. L. Saboori A. & Kendall A. (2016). Pavement life-cycle assessment framework. Federal Highway Administration Washington DC. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/sustainability/hif16014.pdf
40. 10.1007/BF0248328010.1007/BF02483280 ↗
41. Hiep, N. T., Khang, P. H., & Thong, P. Q. (2022). Study on the Use of construction and demolition waste for road base or subbase pavement construction in Hanoi. Journal of Materials and Engineering Structures, 9(4), 467–475. https://revue.ummto.dz/index.php/JMES/article/view/3298
42. 10.3141/2180-0710.3141/2180-07 ↗
43. Hoppe E. J. Lane D. S. Fitch G. M. & Shetty S. (2015). Feasibility of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) use as road base and subbase material (Report No. VCTIR 15-R6). Virginia Center for Transportation Innovation and Research Virginia. Dept. of Transportation United States. Federal Highway Administration. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/28518
44. 10.3390/su13221280710.3390/su132212807 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.02.00210.1016/j.resconrec.2007.02.002 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jtte.2019.04.00310.1016/j.jtte.2019.04.003 ↗
47. 10.1007/s11367-013-0659-010.1007/s11367-013-0659-0 ↗
48. ISO 21930:2017-Sustainability in buildings and civil engineering works – Core rules for environmental product declarations of construction products and services.
49. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11883710.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118837 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12437810.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124378 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.13710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.02.137 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.trd.2019.10.01010.1016/j.trd.2019.10.010 ↗
53. 10.3390/su14171098710.3390/su141710987 ↗
54. 10.3390/ma1605187410.3390/ma16051874 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12193010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121930 ↗
56. 10.1002/er.602110.1002/er.6021 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.13580210.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135802 ↗
58. 10.2478/sspjce-2023-000110.2478/sspjce-2023-0001 ↗
59. 10.3390/buildings1303065210.3390/buildings13030652 ↗
60. 10.3390/polym1503072710.3390/polym15030727 ↗
61. Lewis M. Huang M. Waldman B. Carlisle S. & Simonen K. (2021). Environmental product declaration requirements in procurement policies. Carbon Leadership Forum University of Washington. Seattle WA. Retrieved July 10 2024 from https://carbonleadershipforum.org/epd-requirements-in-procurement-policies/
62. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.06110.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.061 ↗
63. 10.1007/s11356-022-22153-210.1007/s11356-022-22153-2 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.clema.2021.10003110.1016/j.clema.2021.100031 ↗
65. 10.1007/s10098-023-02481-810.1007/s10098-023-02481-8 ↗
66. 10.3390/su1502100310.3390/su15021003 ↗
67. 10.1155/2014/21461210.1155/2014/214612 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.asej.2020.08.03510.1016/j.asej.2020.08.035 ↗
69. McGarrah E. J. (2007). Evaluation of current practices of reclaimed asphalt pavement/virgin aggregate as base course material (Report No. WA-RD 713.1). University of Washington. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering. Washington (State). Department of Transportation. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/37802
70. 10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.02.01010.1016/j.cogsc.2018.02.010 ↗
71. 10.3390/ijerph19221486310.3390/ijerph192214863 ↗
72. Miller T. D. & Bahia H. U. (2009). Sustainable asphalt pavements: Technologies knowledge gaps and opportunities. Modified Asphalt Research Center The University of Wisconsin https://uwmarc.wisc.edu/files/MARC-Sustainable-Asphalt-Pavements-white-paper.pdf
73. 10.1088/1755-1315/665/1/01205710.1088/1755-1315/665/1/012057 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.005 ↗
75. Mukherjee A. (2016). Life cycle assessment of asphalt mixtures in support of an environmental product declaration. Michigan Technological University. Retrieved September 19 2023 from https://www.asphaltpavement.org/uploads/documents/EPD_Program/LCA_final.pdf
76. Mukherjee A. Bhat C. & Harvey J. (2020). Challenges in meeting data needs for use of environmental product declarations in pavement design and construction: state of practice and future scope (Report No. FHWA-HRT-20-022). United States Federal Highway Administration Office of Infrastructure Research and Development. Engineering and Software Consultants Inc.; Michigan Technological University; Turner-Fairbank Highway Research Center. https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/43786
77. 10.3141/2639-1110.3141/2639-11 ↗
78. NAPA. (2022). Product category rules (PCR) for asphalt mixtures. 2nd Edition. 6406 Ivy Lane Suite 350 Greenbelt. NAPA_PCR_AsphaltMixtures_v2.pdf (asphaltpavement.org).
79. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.02910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.029 ↗
80. Norouzi M. Pokharel S. Breault M. & Breault D. (2017). Innovative solution for sustainable road construction. leadership in sustainable infrastructure 1-10. https://www.stratumlogics.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Leadership-in-sustainable-construction_INNOVATIVE_SOLUTION-_FOR_SUSTAINABLE_ROAD_CONSTRUCTION.pdf
81. 10.3390/en1520781310.3390/en15207813 ↗
82. 10.15282/construction.v1i1.632410.15282/construction.v1i1.6324 ↗
83. 10.3390/ma1414386710.3390/ma14143867 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.08810.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.088 ↗
85. Ozer H. Al-Qadi I. & Harvey J. (2016). Strategies for improving sustainability of asphalt pavements. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration FHWA-HIF-16-012. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/sustainability/hif16012.pdf
86. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.15510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.155 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.12910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.04.129 ↗
88. 10.3390/s2318774110.3390/s23187741 ↗
89. 10.3390/environments606007310.3390/environments6060073 ↗
90. 10.1007/s41062-021-00712-910.1007/s41062-021-00712-9 ↗
91. 10.3390/su1202070410.3390/su12020704 ↗
92. 10.3390/su1119541410.3390/su11195414 ↗
93. 10.5585/geas.v9i1.1610810.5585/geas.v9i1.16108 ↗
94. 10.3390/su1308441110.3390/su13084411 ↗
95. 10.3390/en1608333810.3390/en16083338 ↗
96. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12746810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127468 ↗
97. Ritchie, H., Roser, M., & Rosado, P. (2020). CO2 and greenhouse gas emissions. OurWorldInData.org. Retrieved from: https://ourworldindata.org/co2-and-greenhouse-gas-emissions
98. 10.1002/smll.20190346910.1002/smll.201903469 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.10472210.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104722 ↗
100. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.10710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.05.107 ↗