Evaluation of self-healing characteristics of asphalt materials by intermittent loading tests
Source abstract
Abstract
A self-healing index, recovery modulus ratio (RG), was proposed to evaluate the self-healing characteristics of asphalt materials with intermittent loading tests which is more consistent with the traffic loading. In this study, three types of asphalt binders and six types of asphalt mastics were performed on intermittent loading tests. Based on the test results, RG was demonstrated to be a suitable self-healing index for evaluating the effect of filler-asphalt ratio and stress level on the self-healing performance of asphalt materials, and there was a linear positive relationship between it and the growth rate of fatigue life. A higher asphalt-filler ratio deteriorates the self-healing performance of #70 asphalt mastic. However, there is an adverse impact on the harder #50 asphalt mastic. The higher stress level worsens the self-healing performance of base asphalt; however, it has an advantageous influence on SBS modified asphalt within a certain stress level range.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Grouting, Rheology, and Soil Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing, People’s Republic of China
School of Transportation, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, People’s Republic of China
Funding
“973 Program” of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China · National Natural Science Foundation of China · Technology Research and Development Program of China State Railway Group Co., Ltd · the Scientific Research Foundation of Graduate School of Southeast University
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/10916466.2016.124877710.1080/10916466.2016.1248777 ↗
2. 10.3141/2126-0610.3141/2126-06 ↗
3. China M. T. · 2004
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.08910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.08.089 ↗
5. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2001)13:6(434)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2001)13:6(434) ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.02610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.06.026 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.007 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.03410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.034 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.06210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.062 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.11510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.09.115 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.04710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.047 ↗
12. 10.3141/2576-0810.3141/2576-08 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.01610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.016 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.19510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.03.195 ↗
15. Lu X. · 2013
16. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.01.02810.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.01.028 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.07210.1016/j.matdes.2016.12.072 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.03410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.034 ↗
19. Santagata E. · Asphalt Paving Technology: Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists-Proceedings of the Technical Sessions · 2009 · 78 · 567
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.03910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.06.039 ↗
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000008010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000080 ↗
22. 10.1520/JTE2013003010.1520/JTE20130030 ↗
23. 10.1080/14680629.2011.969525910.1080/14680629.2011.9695259 ↗
24. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:6(461)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:6(461) ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.08810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.03.088 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.12610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.07.126 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.00610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.006 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.32852610.1063/1.328526 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.04510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.045 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.16510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.12.165 ↗