journal article·2024-04-02

Effects of road particulate contaminants on pavement skid resistance

Shenqing Xiao, Chenchen Xi, Li Xu, Jilu Li, Yiqiu Tan

Publisher page

Abstract

To understand the effect of particulate contaminants on pavement skid resistance, the friction numbers of three surfaces under different pollution conditions (particle size, coverage fraction, and shape factor) were measured using a British Pendulum Tester (BPT). The results show that less than 45% coverage fraction of the particles above 0.3 mm even results in almost 50% friction loss at a low speed of 10 km/h. In this situation, the rougher surface has a stronger holding particles capacity. Moreover, the particle size determining the lowest friction level gradually increases as the surface roughness increases. The particle size of 1.18–2.36 mm is the most typical size range leading to a low friction level. In addition, the friction first drops sharply and then increases slowly with the coverage fraction increases, which also conforms to the Stribeck curve.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Smart Materials for Construction · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Transportation Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China

Key Laboratory of Road and Bridge Detection and Maintenance Technology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China

Zhejiang Scientific Research Institute of Transport, Hangzhou, China

School of Transportation and Logistics Engineering, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi, China

Funding

Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Road and Bridge Detection and Maintenance Technology of Zhejiang Province · National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.03.00510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.03.005 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.measurement.2019.10726910.1016/j.measurement.2019.107269 ↗
3. 10.3390/su908138910.3390/su9081389 ↗
4. 10.1061/41123(383)12810.1061/41123(383)128 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.triboint.2018.07.02310.1016/j.triboint.2018.07.023 ↗
6. Hall J. W. L. K. L. S. Titus-Glover Wambold J. C. Yager T. J. & Rado Z. (2009). Guide-for-Pavement-Friction-NCHRP-108
7. 10.1007/s11368-020-02804-y10.1007/s11368-020-02804-y ↗
8. 10.1177/135065011770434510.1177/1350650117704345 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.triboint.2019.02.04310.1016/j.triboint.2019.02.043 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.ssci.2006.08.03010.1016/j.ssci.2006.08.030 ↗
11. Lubis A. S. Muis Z. A. & Gultom E. M. (2018). The effect of contaminant on skid resistance of pavement surface Friendly City 4 ‘From Research to Implementation For Better Sustainability’.10.1088/1755-1315/126/1/012040 ↗
12. 10.1007/s40544-016-0135-510.1007/s40544-016-0135-5 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12027310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120273 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.triboint.2008.07.01310.1016/j.triboint.2008.07.013 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.triboint.2012.10.00910.1016/j.triboint.2012.10.009 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13728210.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137282 ↗
17. 10.1007/s11356-020-09653-910.1007/s11356-020-09653-9 ↗
18. 10.1115/1.264785910.1115/1.2647859 ↗
19. 10.1080/10298436.2022.202741510.1080/10298436.2022.2027415 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.12851910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.128519 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12598610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.125986 ↗
22. 10.1122/1.55053510.1122/1.550535 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.12310.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.04.123 ↗