Partially replacing cement with rice husk ash (RHA) in cement stabilised macadam (CSM) containing reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) for qualified base materials
Source abstract
Abstract
High silicon dioxide content enables as a cement substitute. This study explored recycling RHA and RAP in cement stabilised macadam (CSM) to produce a pavement base material. Laboratory experiments covering strength, flexibility, shrinkage, and resistance to temperature variation were conducted on CSM with RAP (40% by weight of natural aggregates) and RHA at 0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, and 80% weight of cement. The results indicated that the compressive strength, resilient modulus, and tensile strength of CSM increased with curing time while the increasing rate and strength after curing decreased with the addition of RHA. The resistance to thermal changes, moisture loss, and the freeze-thaw cycle could be maintained by replacing 20 wt.% (or lower content) cement with RHA. These findings suggest that replacing 20 wt.% of cement with RHA and 40 wt.% of natural aggregates with RAP can generate qualified and environmental pavement base material.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Concrete and Cement Materials Research · Geotechnical and construction materials studies · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
Key Laboratory for Green & Advanced Civil Engineering Materials and Application Technology of Hunan Province, Hunan University, Changsha, People’s Republic of China
References (52)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jksues.2017.01.00410.1016/j.jksues.2017.01.004 ↗
2. 10.1088/1757-899X/1105/1/01209210.1088/1757-899X/1105/1/012092 ↗
3. 10.3141/2084-1110.3141/2084-11 ↗
4. 10.1039/C6GC02153K10.1039/C6GC02153K ↗
5. 10.3390/cryst1102016810.3390/cryst11020168 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.02810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.028 ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000085010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000850 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.09.00810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.09.008 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.02510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.025 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.19310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.193 ↗
11. Copeland A. · 2011
12. 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.07.00410.1016/j.ijsbe.2017.07.004 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.00510.1016/j.cemconres.2003.09.005 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12238910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122389 ↗
15. Habeeb G. A. · Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences · 2009 · 3 · 1616
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11709610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117096 ↗
17. Hoppe, E. J., Lane, D. S., Fitch, G. M. & Shetty, S. (2015). Feasibility of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) use as road base and subbase material. (VCTIR 15-R6). https://rosap.ntl.bts.gov/view/dot/28518
18. 10.1080/21870764.2018.153921010.1080/21870764.2018.1539210 ↗
19. 10.1177/036119810519290010510.1177/0361198105192900105 ↗
20. Huang Z. · Bulletin of the Chinese Ceramic Society · 2015 · 7 · 22
21. 10.1016/0360-1323(92)90014-G10.1016/0360-1323(92)90014-G ↗
22. Klemczak B. · Architecture-Civil Engineering-Environment · 2011 · 4 · 35
23. 10.1088/1757-899X/1025/1/01201310.1088/1757-899X/1025/1/012013 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.09810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.04.098 ↗
25. Nguyen, V. T. (2011). Rice husk ash as a mineral admixture for Ultra High performance Concrete. Delft University of Technology. https://repository.tudelft.nl/islandora/object/uuid%3A2e77e209-ce36-4a9e-be3c-760181f71ae6
26. 10.1080/1029843080234278110.1080/10298430802342781 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.09.05110.1016/j.rser.2015.09.051 ↗
28. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000184410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001844 ↗
29. 10.1007/s40098-014-0137-z10.1007/s40098-014-0137-z ↗
30. 10.1016/j.jksues.2020.10.00610.1016/j.jksues.2020.10.006 ↗
31. 10.1061/JPEODX.000016210.1061/JPEODX.0000162 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11970810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119708 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(239)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(239) ↗
34. 10.3141/1652-3310.3141/1652-33 ↗
35. 10.3390/ma1318405210.3390/ma13184052 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.07.01510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.07.015 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12306810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123068 ↗
38. 10.1139/cjce-2016-005210.1139/cjce-2016-0052 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.04810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.048 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11732610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117326 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.12736410.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127364 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11778310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117783 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.11875010.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118750 ↗
44. 10.1080/10298436.2014.89333110.1080/10298436.2014.893331 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.01610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.016 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.trd.2021.10274910.1016/j.trd.2021.102749 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2019.10027910.1016/j.trgeo.2019.100279 ↗
48. 10.1080/10298436.2018.143588310.1080/10298436.2018.1435883 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.02410.1016/j.wasman.2020.04.024 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.11510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.115 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.02810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.028 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.11492610.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114926 ↗