Flexural fatigue design of steel fibre reinforced concrete pavements: a comparative study
Source abstract
Abstract
Though various material models representing the fatigue response are available for steel fibre reinforced concrete (SFRC), the adequacy of these models for relevant applications such as pavements has not been well established. The objective of the present study is to incorporate generalised fatigue models (based on the various test and fibre parameters) in the available design methods for SFRC pavements and compare the design solutions with existing fatigue models. The study focuses on design methods such as Indian Road Congress – IRC SP 46:2013, modified American Concrete Pavement Association (ACPA) and mechanistic-empirical design method developed at IIT Madras (MEFRC). The design efficiency is considerably improved by the incorporation of generalised models. The MEFRC method with generalised fatigue models (GenFRC) seems to be most efficient in capturing the effect of fibres for both elastic and inelastic regimes of the slab behaviour.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Innovative concrete reinforcement materials · Structural Behavior of Reinforced Concrete · Structural Load-Bearing Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad, Kerala, India
ESSENCE & Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Palakkad, Kerala, India
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.21012/FC10.23483810.21012/FC10.234838 ↗
2. ASTM C1609. (2010). Standard test method for flexural performance of fiber reinforced concrete (using beam with third-point loading), American Society of Testing and Materials, USA.
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000235110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002351 ↗
4. 10.1007/s12666-015-0770-y10.1007/s12666-015-0770-y ↗
5. Batson G. · Journal Proceedings · 1972 · 69 · 673
6. 10.1080/14680629.2018.141867610.1080/14680629.2018.1418676 ↗
7. Cachim, P. B. (1999). Experimental and numerical analysis of the behaviour of structural concrete under fatigue loading with applications to concrete pavements. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto.
8. 10.1016/S0142-1123(01)00093-710.1016/S0142-1123(01)00093-7 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.038 ↗
10. 10.1016/0029-5493(94)00946-V10.1016/0029-5493(94)00946-V ↗
11. fib Model · 2010
12. 10.12989/cac.2012.9.5.38910.12989/cac.2012.9.5.389 ↗
13. Germano, F. & Plizzari, G. A. (2012). Fatigue behavior of SFRC under bending. In Proceedings of the Eighth RILEM Intnl. Symp. on Fibre Reinforced Concrete: challenges and opportunities, (BEFIB 2012), 19-21.
14. 10.1617/s11527-015-0783-310.1617/s11527-015-0783-3 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.03510.1016/j.engstruct.2012.02.035 ↗
16. Granju, J. L., Rossi, P., Rivillon, P., Chanvillard, G. & Mesureur, B. (2000). Delayed behaviour of cracked SFRC beams. In Fifth RILEM Symposium on Fibre-Reinforced Concrete (FRC), Lyon, 511–520.
17. 10.1007/BF0247405610.1007/BF02474056 ↗
18. Indian Road Congress, New Delhi, IRC: SP:46:2013. Guidelines for design and construction of fiber reinforced concrete pavements.
19. Johnston C. D. · Materials Journal · 1991 · 88 · 374
20. 10.1080/14680629.2020.180852110.1080/14680629.2020.1808521 ↗
21. 10.1016/0008-8846(96)00151-210.1016/0008-8846(96)00151-2 ↗
22. Koorikkattil, A., Nayar, S. K. & Venudharan, V. (2020). Flexural fatigue modelling of steel fibre reinforced concrete. Proceedings of National Conference on Resilient Infrastructure (NCRI 2020), Trivandrum, 539-548.
23. 10.1007/978-3-030-83719-8_3810.1007/978-3-030-83719-8_38 ↗
24. 10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00139-710.1016/S0958-9465(02)00139-7 ↗
25. 10.1007/BF0248648610.1007/BF02486486 ↗
26. 10.1061/JSFEAQ.000043210.1061/JSFEAQ.0000432 ↗
27. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:6(650)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:6(650) ↗
28. 10.1016/S0958-9465(98)00004-310.1016/S0958-9465(98)00004-3 ↗
29. 10.1016/0958-9465(91)90029-H10.1016/0958-9465(91)90029-H ↗
30. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
31. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
32. Nayar S. K. · Sādhanā · 2020 · 45 · 1
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:2(273)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1986)112:2(273) ↗
34. Oh B. H. · Materials Journal · 1991 · 88 · 122
35. Ramakrishnan V. · Transportation Research Record · 1989 · 1226 · 17
36. Roesler, J., Bordelon, A., Ionnides, A., Beyer, M. & Wong, D. (2008). A report of the findings of design and concrete material requirements for ultra-thin white toppings. Research Report FHWA-ICT-08-016, Illinois Centre for Transportation, USA.
37. 10.1080/14680629.2021.201138210.1080/14680629.2021.2011382 ↗
38. 10.56748/ejse.89910.56748/ejse.899 ↗
39. Singh S. P. · Asian Journal of Civil Engineering (Building and Housing) · 2004 · 5 · 175
40. Singh S. P. · Materials Journal · 2000 · 97 · 658
41. Singh S. P. · Materials Journal · 2001 · 98 · 306
42. 10.1016/S0958-9465(02)00102-610.1016/S0958-9465(02)00102-6 ↗
43. 10.1260/13694330778015089610.1260/136943307780150896 ↗
44. 10.1631/jzus.2006.A132910.1631/jzus.2006.A1329 ↗
45. 10.1617/s11527-020-01488-710.1617/s11527-020-01488-7 ↗
46. TR 34 · 2003
47. TR 34 · 2013
48. Wei S. · ACI Materials Journal · 1996 · 93
49. 10.1080/14680629.2002.968992510.1080/14680629.2002.9689925 ↗
50. 10.1016/S0142-1123(99)00093-610.1016/S0142-1123(99)00093-6 ↗
51. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:1(66)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2000)12:1(66) ↗