Interpreting asphalt concrete creep behaviour through non-Newtonian mastic rheology
Source abstract
Abstract
This paper explores the use of non-Newtonian mastic models in interpreting asphalt concrete creep behaviour. Three non-Newtonian models were considered, namely the Bingham model, the Herschel-Bulkley model and the Casson model. They were fitted to dynamic shear rheometer (DSR) strain sweep data on mastics. A total of nine mastics were included involving three asphalt mix designs and three aggregate types (hard limestone, granite, and soft limestone). A PG 76-22 binder was used for all of the mastic specimens. Unconfined creep tests were performed on the asphalt concrete mixtures that constitute the mastics using a compressive stress of 207 kPa. The mastic and asphalt concrete mixture specimens were tested at 60°C. The characteristics of the non-Newtonian mastic models (i.e. yield stress, plastic viscosity and consistency) were found to be highly dependent on mastic compositions. Furthermore, the secondary creep curves of the asphalt concrete mixture that constitute the mastics were also found to be correlated to the constants of the mastic models. The plastic viscosity and consistency explained over 75% of the observed variation in asphalt mix creep slope, while the yield stress explained approximately 50% of the observed variation in the asphalt concrete creep intercept.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Numerical methods in engineering
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (18)
Show source-provided references
1. Abbas A. · ASCE Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2004 · 16 · 13310.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:2(133) ↗
2. Abbas A. · International Journal of Pavement Engineering · 2005 · 6 · 13710.1080/10298430500159040 ↗
3. Alvarado C. · 2007
4. Anton Paar Germany GmbH. (2006). Reoplus Software Version 2.8.
5. Bahia, H., Hanson, I., Zeng, M., Zhai, H., Khatri, A. and Anderson, M. 2001. “Characterisation of modified asphalt binders in Superpave mix design (NCHRP 459 Report)”. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
6. Bahia H. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1999 · 68 · 1
7. Brodnyan, J., Gaskins, F. and Philippoff, W. Correlation between rheological parameters measured in instruments of different Geometry. Symposium on non-Newtonian viscometry, Vol. 299, pp.14 (American Society for Testing and Materials)10.1520/STP41253S ↗
8. Delgadillo R. · International Journal of Road Materials and Pavement Design · 2010 · 11 · 65310.1080/14680629.2010.9690298 ↗
9. 10.1122/1.54885710.1122/1.548857 ↗
10. Huang C. W. · Mechanics of Time Dependent Materials · 2007 · 11 · 9110.1007/s11043-007-9034-5 ↗
11. Kim Y.-R. · ASCE Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2004 · 16 · 12210.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2004)16:2(122) ↗
12. Majidzadeh, K. and Schweyer, H. Non-Newtonian behaviour of asphalt cements. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists Proceedings, Vol. 34, pp.20–44.
13. Masad E. · Journal of Transportation Engineering · 2001 · 127 · 47710.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2001)127:6(477) ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.08.01210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.08.012 ↗
15. Palade L.-I. · Rheol Acta · 2000 · 39 · 18010.1007/s003970050018 ↗
16. Papagiannakis, T. and Masad, E.Pavement design and materials, 153Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
17. Schapery R. A. · Polymer Engineering and Science · 1969 · 9 · 29510.1002/pen.760090410 ↗
18. Wasage T. · International Journal of Road Materials and Pavement Design · 2010 · 11 · 72510.1080/14680629.2010.9690301 ↗