Dynamic modulus and damping ratio of compacted loess under long-term traffic loading
Source abstract
Abstract
Previous studies have centred on the long-term permanent deformation behaviour of soil under traffic loading while neglecting the dynamic parameters as it is affected by cycle number. In this study, forty tri-axial dynamic tests were conducted to assess the effects of cycle number, confining pressure, and dynamic stress on the dynamic modulus and damping ratio of compacted loess. Empirical models of both parameters were established and examined, from which emerged a nearly linear relationship between the dynamic stress-strain points when dynamic stress fell below a given threshold value. The representative dynamic modulus in the linear range initially increased and then decreased. The maximum representative dynamic modulus linearly increased as confining pressure increased, while confining pressure had no clear effect on the damping ratio. As the dynamic stress increased, the damping ratio was initially stable and then gradually increased until becoming stable again at a higher level.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Landslides and related hazards · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China
Institute of Underground Structure and Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an, People’s Republic of China
Funding
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD · National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTM. (2003). Standard test methods for the determination of the modulus and damping properties of soils using the cyclic triaxial apparatus. ASTM D3999-91. ASTM.
2. China National Standards. (1999). Standard for soil test method. CNS-GB/T50123-1999. Standardization Administration of China (SAC), Ministry of Construction, Ministry of Water Resources. China Planning Press.
3. 10.1016/j.trgeo.2014.07.00310.1016/j.trgeo.2014.07.003 ↗
4. 10.1631/jzus.A120033710.1631/jzus.A1200337 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.01210.1016/j.soildyn.2017.08.012 ↗
6. 10.1080/14680629.2018.151251710.1080/14680629.2018.1512517 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.02910.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.029 ↗
8. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000281510.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002815 ↗
9. 10.1061/AJGEB6.000072710.1061/AJGEB6.0000727 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.apor.2018.02.00210.1016/j.apor.2018.02.002 ↗
11. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000164110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001641 ↗
12. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:12(1006)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:12(1006) ↗
13. 10.1080/14680629.2017.140781910.1080/14680629.2017.1407819 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2009.01.00410.1016/j.coldregions.2009.01.004 ↗
15. 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.000085910.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000859 ↗
16. Ma X. · Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering · 2019 · 1
17. Monismith C. L. · Transportation Research Board · 1975 · 537 · 1
18. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2007.01.00510.1016/j.soildyn.2007.01.005 ↗
19. 10.1016/1040-6182(90)90034-210.1016/1040-6182(90)90034-2 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11440-017-0567-810.1007/s11440-017-0567-8 ↗
21. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102638210.1080/14680629.2015.1026382 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2018.10.00310.1016/j.coldregions.2018.10.003 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:2(133)10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1988)114:2(133) ↗
24. 10.1016/j.enggeo.2012.06.00910.1016/j.enggeo.2012.06.009 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2018.12.01310.1016/j.soildyn.2018.12.013 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.12.01110.1016/j.soildyn.2014.12.011 ↗
27. 10.1080/14680629.2019.169622110.1080/14680629.2019.1696221 ↗
28. 10.3208/sandf1972.22.3_7710.3208/sandf1972.22.3_77 ↗
29. Zhong Z. · European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering · 2019 · 1
30. 10.1016/j.coldregions.2011.07.00710.1016/j.coldregions.2011.07.007 ↗