journal article·2021-06-01Open access

Quantitative relationship of fundamental rheological properties of bitumen with the empirical Ring and Ball softening point

Jiqing Zhu, Xiaohu Lu, Michael Langfjell, Anders Gudmarsson

Road Materials and Pavement Design· Volume 22· Issue sup1

Abstract

This paper employs the linear viscoelastic parameter G′/tanδ as the quantitative criterion for identifying a common relationship with the Ring and Ball softening point of both unmodified and polymer-modified bitumen (PMB). Temperature sweep was conducted at 10 rad/s with dynamic shear rheometer to determine the complex shear modulus G* and phase angle δ of bitumen. The parameter G′/tanδ could be obtained. Logarithmic interpolation was applied for G′/tanδ to determine the equivalent softening temperature Ts_G′/tanδ at which G′/tanδ equals the proposed criterion values. With this method, a good agreement could be reached between Ts_G′/tanδ and the softening point for both unmodified bitumen and PMB. While keeping high accuracy for unmodified bitumen, the accuracy of Ts_G′/tanδ as an estimation of the softening point of PMB was largely improved when compared to the iso-modulus approach. The reliability of this quantitative relationship is preliminarily verified and its implementation is discussed in the Black space.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Transport Systems and Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI), Linköping, Sweden

Nynas AB, Nynäshamn, Sweden

Peab Asfalt AB, Hisings-Backa, Sweden

Peab Asfalt AB, Hägersten, Sweden

Funding

Trafikverket

References (29)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/14680629.2018.148325810.1080/14680629.2018.1483258 ↗
2. Anderson R. M. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2011 · 80 · 615
3. BiTVal. (2006). Analysis of available data for validation of bitumen tests (Report on Phase 1 of the BiTVal Project). Forum of European National Highway Research Laboratories (FEHRL).
4. 10.14311/EE.2016.09710.14311/EE.2016.097 ↗
5. 10.1617/s11527-010-9603-y10.1617/s11527-010-9603-y ↗
6. Eurobitume · 2009
7. Eurobitume · 2012
8. Fan L. · China Petroleum Processing & Petrochemical Technology · 2014 · 16 · 19
9. FunDBitS · 2016
10. 10.1080/14680629.2018.144750410.1080/14680629.2018.1447504 ↗
11. Glover, C. J., Davison, R. R., Domke, C. H., Ruan, Y., Juristyarini, P., Knorr, D. B. & Jung, S. H. (2005). Development of a new method for assessing asphalt binder durability with field validation (Report No. FHWA/TX-05/1872-2). Texas Transportation Institute.
12. Heukelom W. · Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1973 · 42 · 67
13. Jelagin, D., Ahmed, A. W., Lu, X. & Said, S. F. (2018). Asphalt layer rutting performance prediction tools (VTI Report No. 968A). Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI).
14. Koenders B. · 2015 · 87
15. 10.14311/EE.2016.26910.14311/EE.2016.269 ↗
16. 10.1515/ntrev-2019-002110.1515/ntrev-2019-0021 ↗
17. 10.1016/S0950-0618(96)00033-510.1016/S0950-0618(96)00033-5 ↗
18. 10.1520/JTE11874J10.1520/JTE11874J ↗
19. Lu X. · International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology · 2014 · 7 · 381
20. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126675610.1080/14680629.2016.1266756 ↗
21. Nigen-Chaidron S. · 2008
22. Pfeiffer J. P. · Journal of the Institution of Petroleum Technologists · 1936 · 22 · 414
23. Rowe G. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2011 · 80 · 649
24. Rowe G. M. · 2014
25. Sharma, B. K., Ma, J., Kunwar, B., Singhvi, P., Ozer, H. & Rajagopalan, N. (2017). Modeling the performance properties of RAS and RAP blended asphalt mixes using chemical compositional information (Report No. FHWA-ICT-17-001). Illinois Center for Transportation.
26. 10.1007/s00414-017-1733-010.1007/s00414-017-1733-0 ↗
27. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100269-8.00001-510.1016/B978-0-08-100269-8.00001-5 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2015.07.04910.1016/j.forsciint.2015.07.049 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.03710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.037 ↗