Mix design and performance evaluation of coloured slurry seal mixture containing natural iron oxide red pigments
Source abstract
Abstract
The use of durable coloured surface treatment can be one of the best cost reduction strategies for road maintenance. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility of applying natural iron oxide red pigments in a slurry seal mix design in order to change the colour of this type of asphalt and evaluate its performance. In this regard, first, the physical and chemical properties of the rock and pigment materials were evaluated. Then, 4 different mixtures containing 0, 3, 6, and 9% pigment as filler replacement by dry weight of total aggregate with three different levels of bitumen emulsion were used. The design results indicated that the mixture containing 9% of the pigment had the best performance among the mixtures. According to the results, red iron oxide pigment would improve adhesion of bitumen emulsion to rock aggregate, abrasion resistance, and also vertical deformation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Pigment Synthesis and Properties · Concrete and Cement Materials Research
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Civil Engineering, Shomal University, Mazandaran, Iran
Department of Civil Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology (IUST), Tehran, Iran
Department of Civil Engineering, Payame Noor University (PNU), Tehran, Iran
References (42)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.03310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.04.033 ↗
2. ASTM · 2015
3. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.10010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.100 ↗
4. Broughton, B. & Lee, S.J. (2012). Microsurfacing in Texas. Texas Transportation Institute (Report No. FHWA/TX-12/0-6668-1), Texas A & M University System.
5. Bruce S. · 1992
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.03710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.037 ↗
7. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102967010.1080/14680629.2015.1029670 ↗
8. DIN · 2018
9. 10.1051/matecconf/2012020100310.1051/matecconf/20120201003 ↗
10. 10.1051/mattech/201403010.1051/mattech/2014030 ↗
11. ISSA · 2010
12. ISSA · 2017
13. ISSA · 2017
14. ISSA · 2017
15. ISSA · 2017
16. ISSA · 2017
17. ISSA · 2017
18. 10.1080/10298436.2018.148350610.1080/10298436.2018.1483506 ↗
19. Johannes P. T. · 2014
20. 10.1051/matecconf/20181620502710.1051/matecconf/201816205027 ↗
21. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1054.24810.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1054.248 ↗
22. 10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00209-610.1016/S0008-8846(03)00209-6 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.01010.1016/j.cemconres.2004.06.010 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.06.00510.1016/j.buildenv.2006.06.005 ↗
25. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.723.68610.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.723.686 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.01.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.01.004 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.07.00510.1016/j.cemconcomp.2009.07.005 ↗
28. 10.1080/14680629.2016.119488110.1080/14680629.2016.1194881 ↗
29. 10.14311/EE.2016.40910.14311/EE.2016.409 ↗
30. 10.1088/1757-899X/207/1/01210410.1088/1757-899X/207/1/012104 ↗
31. Piérard N. · 2015
32. 10.1080/10298436.2018.155154410.1080/10298436.2018.1551544 ↗
33. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000236110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0002361 ↗
34. Raza, H. (1994). State-of-the-practice design, construction, and performance of micro-surfacing. Final Report, No. FHWA-SA-94-051.
35. Roess R. P. · 2004
36. 10.1016/j.solener.2006.08.00510.1016/j.solener.2006.08.005 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.09810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.11.098 ↗
38. 10.2991/ifeesd-16.2016.8710.2991/ifeesd-16.2016.87 ↗
39. 10.1080/10298436.2017.140260210.1080/10298436.2017.1402602 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.jtte.2018.12.00510.1016/j.jtte.2018.12.005 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.03210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.032 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.10.00110.1016/j.dyepig.2013.10.001 ↗