Comparing the performance of SBS and thermoplastics modified asphalt binders and asphalt mixes
Source abstract
Abstract
This study comprehensively compares the conventional, rheological, morphological, and asphalt mix performance among SBS and several thermoplastics (TPs) modified binders. TPs modified binders (TP-MBs) may have modulus values similar to SBS modified binders (SBS-MBs), but several other critical properties were far inferior. Percent elastic recovery of ungrafted TP-MBs was < 10 percent, phase angle values were close to 80°, and the softening point was 15–20°C lesser than SBS-MBs. At intermediate and low temperatures, TP-MBs exhibited higher complex modulus values and increased the PG intermediate and low temperature. The presence of TP polymer even reduces the ductility compared to the base binder. Similarly, TP-MBs enhance the Marshall stability and rut resistance in mixes by 20–40 percent, but the improvement was not observed in moisture susceptibility, indirect tensile strength, and fatigue crack performance. Hence, analysis limited to the modulus of the MBs, Marshall stability, and rutting in mixes can falsely indicate that TPs can increase the overall performance of asphalt binders and mixes.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Polymer and Process Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee, Roorkee, India
Funding
SERB
References (58)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1023/B:JMSC.0000012927.00747.8310.1023/B:JMSC.0000012927.00747.83 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00289-021-03868-710.1007/s00289-021-03868-7 ↗
3. 10.1007/s42947-021-00113-210.1007/s42947-021-00113-2 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.04410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.05.044 ↗
5. 10.22060/CEEJ.2020.17919.671110.22060/CEEJ.2020.17919.6711 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.10346110.1016/j.geotexmem.2019.103461 ↗
7. 10.14445/22315381/IJETT-V22P26810.14445/22315381/IJETT-V22P268 ↗
8. Asphalt Institute. (2014). Mix design methods for asphalt concrete and other hot-mix types. Manual series No. 2 (MS-2) (7th ed.).
9. 10.2478/sjce-2021-000510.2478/sjce-2021-0005 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.10.04910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2018.10.049 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.05010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.050 ↗
12. 10.1177/009524431246996410.1177/0095244312469964 ↗
13. 10.1007/BF0248327810.1007/BF02483278 ↗
14. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(224)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2002)14:3(224) ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.02710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.027 ↗
16. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1998)10:3(161)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(1998)10:3(161) ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.00310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.003 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.12.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.12.001 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.07.00410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.07.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.02110.1016/j.matdes.2008.06.021 ↗
21. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.919-921.107910.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.919-921.1079 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12164410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121644 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000409210.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004092 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.00210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.002 ↗
25. 10.1080/10298436.2018.150327310.1080/10298436.2018.1503273 ↗
26. 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.000051610.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000516 ↗
27. 10.1080/14680629.2018.144750510.1080/14680629.2018.1447505 ↗
28. 10.1080/14680629.2011.64411310.1080/14680629.2011.644113 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11724610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117246 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.01910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.019 ↗
31. 10.1007/BF0248690410.1007/BF02486904 ↗
32. 10.1016/S0142-9418(00)00004-010.1016/S0142-9418(00)00004-0 ↗
33. 10.1007/BF0247944010.1007/BF02479440 ↗
34. 10.6135/ijprt.org.tw/201410.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2014 ↗
35. 10.1134/S107042720606028010.1134/S1070427206060280 ↗
36. 10.1080/10916466.2016.125145710.1080/10916466.2016.1251457 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.06410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.064 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.12.02410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.12.024 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.03710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.12.037 ↗
40. 10.3844/ajassp.2007.390.39610.3844/ajassp.2007.390.396 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.11110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.111 ↗
42. 10.1155/2016/593827010.1155/2016/5938270 ↗
43. 10.1080/1029843050049514710.1080/10298430500495147 ↗
44. 10.1002/pen.2038610.1002/pen.20386 ↗
45. 10.1021/ef049751310.1021/ef0497513 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.05.03410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2005.05.034 ↗
47. 10.1080/1029843090325529610.1080/10298430903255296 ↗
48. 10.1177/009524431453843710.1177/0095244314538437 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.02010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.020 ↗
50. Simon, A. M. H., Theo, T., & Willem, C. V. (2000). Low temperature performance of sbs-modified asphalt mixes. Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, 69, 540–571.
51. 10.1016/S0021-9797(02)00197-210.1016/S0021-9797(02)00197-2 ↗
52. 10.1155/2017/983240610.1155/2017/9832406 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.07.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.07.007 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11879010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118790 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.ijtst.2019.04.00110.1016/j.ijtst.2019.04.001 ↗
56. 10.1002/app.4039810.1002/app.40398 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12070410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120704 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.02.00510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.02.005 ↗