Monitoring the evolution of the structural properties of warm recycled pavements with Falling Weight Deflectometer and laboratory tests
Source abstract
Abstract
In pavement engineering, the use of warm mix asphalt (WMA) technologies can ensure important environmental and technical benefits. However, several uncertainties about WMA still exist, such as long-term field performance and full compatibility with reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) or polymer modified bitumen (PMB). In this regard, a full-scale trial section (including three test fields with warm recycled mixtures prepared with different WMA chemical additives and a reference test field with hot recycled mixtures, all containing PMB) was constructed along an Italian motorway and monitored for several years of service life. The evolution of the structural properties was assessed with in-situ Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) tests and laboratory tests on extracted cores, both immediately after the construction of the trial section and after more than three years under actual traffic loading. It was found that the reduced working temperatures adopted for the WMA mixes (40°C lower than hot mix asphalt (HMA)) did not penalise the workability and the stiffness immediately after the trial section construction, whereas the HMA mixture experienced higher structural damage (likely due to more severe aging) during the in-service life. The WMA mixes exhibited better stiffness homogeneity and, overall, superior performance and potentially longer service life with respect to the reference HMA mixture.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Dipartimento di Ingegneria Civile, Edile, e Architettura (DICEA), Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.25810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.258 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.03810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.038 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12212810.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122128 ↗
4. COST 336 · 2005
5. CROW Report 17 · 1998
6. CROW-report D05-06. (2005). Guideline on PCN assignment in the Netherlands.
7. 10.1177/036119811878796010.1177/0361198118787960 ↗
8. EN 12697-26. (2012). Bituminous mixtures - test methods for hot mix asphalt - Part 26: Stiffness.
9. Evensen R. · 1992
10. 10.1617/s11527-017-1096-510.1617/s11527-017-1096-5 ↗
11. 10.1080/19648189.2016.117968010.1080/19648189.2016.1179680 ↗
12. Frigio F. · 2016 · 29
13. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12170410.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121704 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11709610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117096 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.27510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.275 ↗
16. Pasetto, M. & Baldo, N. (2006, August 12–17). Critical analysis of the EN 12697-26 standard for the determination of the indirect tensile stiffness modulus. 10th International Conference on Asphalt Pavements, Quebec City, Canada, vol. 1 (pp. 327–335).
17. 10.3390/app904074210.3390/app9040742 ↗
18. 10.1080/14680629.2017.137499110.1080/14680629.2017.1374991 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.05310.1016/j.jclepro.2011.11.053 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.04610.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.046 ↗
21. Stimilli A. · 2017 · 143
22. Stimilli A. · 2017 · 1267
23. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102967810.1080/14680629.2015.1029678 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.23510.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.235 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.08710.1016/j.rser.2017.01.087 ↗
26. 10.3141/2575-2110.3141/2575-21 ↗
27. 10.1080/14680629.2012.65704210.1080/14680629.2012.657042 ↗
28. 10.1617/s11527-019-1371-810.1617/s11527-019-1371-8 ↗