Dynamic properties of reclaimed soft soil under the combined frequency cyclic loading
Source abstract
Abstract
In this paper, the effects of the number of load cycles and combined loading frequencies on the dynamic properties of reclaimed soft soil are studied by experimental tests. In these tests, the reclaimed soft soil samples after vacuum preloading are tested using a GCTS hollow cylinder testing device in the laboratory. The results show that the deformation of reclaimed soft soil under combined low/higher frequency is larger than that under combined high/lower frequency. The pore water pressure is found to increase dramatically and exceed 40% in the second stage of cyclic loading, and has significant difference between the combined loading frequencies. The cyclic loading of the first stage has a significant effect on the tendency and stable value of the degradation index under combined loading frequencies. This study shows that the stress–strain hysteresis curves are closer to the longitudinal axis at different vibration frequencies, and most hysteresis loops are not closed with the number of load cycles increasing at a vibration period. Meanwhile, the stress–strain hysteresis curves related with the number of load cycles are discussed at different combined frequencies.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Mechanics · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China
Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety of the Education Ministry, Tianjin University, Tianjin, People's Republic of China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Tianjin Municipal Science and Technology Commission · Tianjin Research Program of Application Foundation and Advanced Technology
References (17)
Show source-provided references
1. Bai B. · Rock and Soil Mechanics · 1990 · 20 · 84
2. Chen J. · Geotechnical Investigation and Surveying · 2013 · 7 · 18
3. Chen Y. · 2006 · 3
4. 10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.02910.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.029 ↗
5. Huang B. · Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering · 2011 · 33 · 195
6. Lei H. · Journal of Chang’an University · 2009 · 29 · 54
7. Lei H. · Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering · 2013 · 35 · 2328
8. Momoya a. Y. · Soils and Foundations · 1995 · 45 · 9910.3208/sandf.45.4_99 ↗
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.000092210.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000922 ↗
10. Nguyen B. T. · Australian Geomechanics Journal · 2015 · 50 · 45
11. 10.1016/j.compgeo.2012.11.01110.1016/j.compgeo.2012.11.011 ↗
12. 10.1080/14680629.2015.108017910.1080/14680629.2015.1080179 ↗
13. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.633-634.109510.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.633-634.1095 ↗
14. 10.3208/sandf1972.22.3_7710.3208/sandf1972.22.3_77 ↗
15. 10.3208/sandf1972.15.3_2710.3208/sandf1972.15.3_27 ↗
16. Zhang J. · Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering · 1990 · 12 · 89
17. Zhou J. · Chinese Civil Engineering Journal · 2000 · 33 · 75