journal article·2023-12-02

A comparative experimental study of geocell and geogrid-reinforced highway base layers under repeated loads

Yakup Önal, Mustafa Çalışıcı, Cafer Kayadelen, Gökhan Altay

Road Materials and Pavement Design· Volume 24· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents experimental results of laboratory model tests of geosynthetic reinforced highway base layers subjected to repeated loads. The potential benefit of geocell and geogrid, when used in the base layer as a reinforcement material, was examined and assessed by performance indicators including total, permanent (plastic), and elastic (resilient) deformation, traffic benefit ratio (TBR), rut depth reduction (RDR), percentage of elastic deformation, and resilient modulus (MR). In the light of the results of this study, geocell and geogrid-reinforced bases outperform the unreinforced base in terms of elastic and permanent deformations. Further experimental results reveal that although the thickness of the base layer was decreased to a rate of 33%, geocell and geogrid enable a considerable reduction in the rut depth at an approximate rate of 21% and 13%, respectively. Moreover, when the thickness of the base layer remains constant, about 48% to 43% reduction in the rut depth was provided by geocell and geogrid reinforcement.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Geotechnical Engineering and Soil Stabilization · Geotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures · Landfill Environmental Impact Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Turkey

Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, İskenderun Technical University, Iskenderun-Hatay, Turkey

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Ahlvin, R. G., & Ulery, H. H. (1962). Tabulated values for determining the complete pattern of stresses,: strains, and deflections beneath a uniform circular load on a homogeneous half space. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Highway Research Board, (342), 1–13.
2. 10.14256/JCE.3401.202110.14256/JCE.3401.2021 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0266-1144(01)00006-110.1016/S0266-1144(01)00006-1 ↗
4. 10.1680/gein.2004.11.1.3510.1680/gein.2004.11.1.35 ↗
5. 10.1080/10298436.2019.158743710.1080/10298436.2019.1587437 ↗
6. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(775)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(775) ↗
7. 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(787)10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2004)130:8(787) ↗
8. 10.1061/AJGEB6.000118710.1061/AJGEB6.0001187 ↗
9. 10.12989/gae.2016.10.4.40510.12989/gae.2016.10.4.405 ↗
10. 10.7764/rdlc.21.1.6910.7764/rdlc.21.1.69 ↗
11. 10.1080/19386362.2017.134398810.1080/19386362.2017.1343988 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13928110.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139281 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.08.00210.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.08.002 ↗
14. 10.1080/17486025.2015.102901210.1080/17486025.2015.1029012 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.03.00710.1016/j.ijprt.2017.03.007 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.06.00210.1016/j.geotexmem.2010.06.002 ↗
17. 10.1061/41165(397)48510.1061/41165(397)485 ↗
18. 10.1007/s40098-014-0120-810.1007/s40098-014-0120-8 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.04.00810.1016/j.geotexmem.2017.04.008 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.00710.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.007 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.12.00310.1016/j.geotexmem.2013.12.003 ↗
22. Technical Specifications for Highways. (2013). General directorate of highways.
23. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.06.00410.1016/j.geotexmem.2012.06.004 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.01110.1016/j.geotexmem.2009.12.011 ↗
25. Zhao, M. H., Zhang, L., Zou, X. J., & Zhao, H. (2009). Research progress in two-direction reinforced composite foundation formed by geocell reinforced mattress and gravel piles. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 22(1), 1–10.