journal article·2024-02Open access

Uncertainty analysis of life cycle assessment of asphalt surfacings

Ahmed Abed, Diana Eliza Godoi Bizarro, Luis Neves, Tony Parry, Elisabeth Keijzer, Bjorn Kalman, Ana Jimenez Del Barco Carrion, Konstantinos Mantalovas, Gabriella Buttitta, Davide Lo Presti, Gordon Airey

Abstract

The Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of asphalt pavements are associated with significant uncertainty resulting from variability in the quantity and impact of individual components, the quality of data for each component, and variability of asphalt durability. This study presents a framework to quantify and incorporate the uncertainty of LCA and asphalt durability data into LCA of asphalt surfacings. The suggested framework includes: estimating the uncertainty of asphalt production processes by the pedigree matrix method, conducting a deterministic LCA, applying Monte Carlo Simulation (MCS) to estimate the probability density functions (PDFs) of the considered impacts using the uncertainty data, deterministic solution, and asphalt durability. This framework was applied to six asphalt mixtures; the results show that there is significant uncertainty in the processes that contribute to the environmental impacts. They also showed that considering asphalt durability and its uncertainty is critical and can significantly change the results and interpretation of LCA.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Vehicle emissions and performance

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

Department of Civil Engineering, Aston University, Birmingham, UK

Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Utrecht, The Netherlands

Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI), Linkoping, Sweden

Department of Construction Engineering and Engineering Projects, University of Granada, Granada, Spain

Department of Engineering, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy

Funding

Conference of European Directors of Roads

References (40)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/14680629.2019.159322910.1080/14680629.2019.1593229 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.00410.1016/j.resconrec.2013.12.004 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11367-017-1400-110.1007/s11367-017-1400-1 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.trd.2017.02.01810.1016/j.trd.2017.02.018 ↗
5. 10.3390/su1303138210.3390/su13031382 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.10616010.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106160 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.00210.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.002 ↗
8. BSI. (2013). BS EN 15804:2012 + A1:2013, sustainability of construction works – environmental product declarations – core rules for the product category of construction products. British Standards Institution.
9. BSI. (2019). BS EN 15804:2012 + A2:2019, sustainability of construction works – environmental product declarations – core rules for the product category of construction products. British Standards Institution.
10. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.03110.1016/j.resconrec.2019.04.031 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.20710.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.207 ↗
12. EAPA. (2018a). Asphalt in figures. European Asphalt Pavement Association. Retrieved April from https://eapa.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Asphalt-in-figures_2018.pdf
13. EAPA. (2018b). Heavy duty surfaces: The arguments for SMA. European Asphalt Pavement Association. Retrieved June 19, 2021, from https://096.wpcdnnode.com/eapa.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Heavy_Duty_Surfaces__The_Arguments_for_SMA.pdf
14. Ecoinvent. (2020). Ecoinvent – the world’s most consistent & transparent life cycle inventory database. Retrieved June from https://www.ecoinvent.org/home.html
15. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.00610.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.006 ↗
16. Guinée, J. B., & Lindeijer, E. (2002). Handbook on life cycle assessment: Operational guide to the ISO standards (Vol. 7). Springer Science & Business Media.
17. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.04610.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.04.046 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11367-011-0334-210.1007/s11367-011-0334-2 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14350610.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143506 ↗
20. 10.1007/BF0297983510.1007/BF02979835 ↗
21. 10.1007/BF0297872810.1007/BF02978728 ↗
22. ISO. (2006). Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework ISO 14040: 2006. International Organisation of Standarisation.
23. 10.1061/jpeodx.000003410.1061/jpeodx.0000034 ↗
24. 10.1080/14680629.2016.118155910.1080/14680629.2016.1181559 ↗
25. Kootstra L. Schwarz A. Keijzer E. Bizarro D. Kuling L. Horssen A. v. & Albers R. (2020). Product category rules voor bitumineuze materialen in verkeersdragers en waterwerken in Nederland (“PCR Asfalt”) [Product category rules for bituminous materials in traffic carriers and waterworks in the Netherlands (PCR Asphalt)].
26. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0096710.1021/acs.est.8b00967 ↗
27. 10.1007/s11367-014-0759-510.1007/s11367-014-0759-5 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.trd.2013.10.00210.1016/j.trd.2013.10.002 ↗
29. PavementLCM. (2020). Life cycle management of green asphalt mixtures and road pavement: CEDR call 2017 new materials. Retrieved June 20 from https://www.pavementlcm.eu/
30. Presti D. L. D’Angelo G. & Noto S. (2015). Toward a sustainable 100% recycling of reclaimed asphalt in road pavements: Economic and environmental impact of the AllBack2Pave technologie.
31. 10.3390/su1119541410.3390/su11195414 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.04610.1016/j.procir.2017.11.046 ↗
33. 10.3141/2037-1310.3141/2037-13 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.07.00510.1016/j.resconrec.2011.07.005 ↗
35. Varveri A. Avgerinopoulos S. Scarpas T. Cliff Nicholls T. Mollenhauer U. K. McNally C. & Gibney A. (2014). Effects on availability of road network: Cost and CO2e modelling of lower-temperature asphalt materials with recycled content as used in site trials.
36. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.02.01810.1016/j.resconrec.2013.02.018 ↗
37. Vos-Effting S. d. Keijzer E. Jansen B. & Zwamborn A. (2018). LCA achtergrondrapport voor Nederlandse asfaltmengsels [LCA background report for Dutch asphalt mixtures]. T. R. v. Netherland. https://www.asfaltblij.nl/media/2584/lca-brancherepresentatieve-asfaltmengsels-versie-21.pdf
38. Weidema B. P. Bauer C. Hischier R. Mutel C. Nemecek T. Reinhard J. Vadenbo C. O. & Wernet G. (2013). Overview and methodology: Data quality guideline for the ecoinvent database version 3.
39. 10.1016/S0959-6526(96)00043-110.1016/S0959-6526(96)00043-1 ↗
40. 10.1007/s11367-018-1528-710.1007/s11367-018-1528-7 ↗