Chemo-rheological equivalence of bitumen between different lab ageing procedures: from binder to mixture
Source abstract
Abstract
In an attempt to mimic the in-situ ageing of asphalt pavements, the exploration of appropriate laboratory ageing simulations has led to multiple standards on binder level. On asphalt mixture level, however, less consensus exists regarding ageing simulation protocols. This study aims to compare the chemo-rheological performance of bitumen between lab ageing protocols for binders, compacted and loose asphalt mixtures. A bituminous binder was used in bitumen ageing protocols, while it was also used to produce an AC10 mixture that was conditioned as a loose mixture and for compacted cylinders and slabs. Oven ageing of the mixtures was conducted for up to 9 days at 85 °C. The binder testing results, derived from empirical, rheological and chemical tests, indicate that 20 h of PAV ageing yields approximately similar results as 1–2 days of loose mixture oven ageing. Furthermore, in compacted samples, only the outer edge was influenced significantly by oxidative ageing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Transport Systems and Technology
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Faculty of Applied Engineering, EMIB research group, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
School of Civil Engineering, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
References (36)
Show source-provided references
1. Abatech. (2011). Rheology analysis software (version 2.3).
2. Bell C. A. AbWahab Y. Cristi M. E. & Sosnovske D. (1994). Selection of laboratory aging procedures for asphalt-aggregate mixtures .
3. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.30510.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.305 ↗
4. Christensen D. W. & Anderson D. A. (1991). Rheological evidence concerning the molecular architecture of asphalt cements . Proceedings Chemistry of Bitumen Rome.
5. Christensen D. W. Mensching D. Rowe G. M. Anderson R. M. Hanz A. Reinke G. & Anderson D. A. (2019). Past present and future of asphalt binder rheological parameters: Synopsis of 2017 technical session 307 . 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.
6. 10.1080/10298436.2018.150884510.1080/10298436.2018.1508845 ↗
7. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126674010.1080/14680629.2016.1266740 ↗
8. 10.1080/14680629.2021.190673410.1080/14680629.2021.1906734 ↗
9. 10.1617/s11527-017-1059-x10.1617/s11527-017-1059-x ↗
10. 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.03010.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.030 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12559610.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125596 ↗
12. 10.1177/0361198121103221810.1177/03611981211032218 ↗
13. 10.17226/2495910.17226/24959 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.03510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.035 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12263210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.122632 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11827610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118276 ↗
17. 10.1002/9780470479216.corpsy049110.1002/9780470479216.corpsy0491 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11949510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119495 ↗
19. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000002110.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000021 ↗
20. Moulthrop J. S. & Mortavazi M. (1993). The SHRP materials reference library .
21. 10.1080/10298436.2021.202026710.1080/10298436.2021.2020267 ↗
22. Petersen J. C. (2009). A review of the fundamentals of asphalt oxidation: chemical physicochemical physical property and durability relationships .
23. 10.1080/14680629.2011.971389510.1080/14680629.2011.9713895 ↗
24. Petersen J. C. Robertson R. E. Branthaver J. F. Harnsberger P. M. Duvall J. J. Kim S.-S. Anderson D. A. Christiansen D. Bahia H. Dongre R. N. Antle C. E. A. E. Sharma M. G. Button J. W. & Glover C. J. (1994). Binder characterization and evaluation. Volume 4: test methods .
25. 10.1617/s11527-022-01986-w10.1617/s11527-022-01986-w ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12318210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123182 ↗
27. 10.1039/c9ra00645a10.1039/c9ra00645a ↗
28. 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.04410.1016/j.fuel.2014.09.044 ↗
29. 10.1007/978-94-017-7342-3_7510.1007/978-94-017-7342-3_75 ↗
30. 10.1520/jte2013024510.1520/jte20130245 ↗
31. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138909410.1080/14680629.2017.1389094 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12497510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124975 ↗
33. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126673910.1080/14680629.2016.1266739 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.19710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.197 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.11703210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117032 ↗
36. 10.1177/0361198122107982310.1177/03611981221079823 ↗