journal article·2022-01-02

Indirect tensile test as a simple method for rut resistance evaluation of asphalt mixtures – Polish experience

Piotr Zieliński

Publisher page

Abstract

To assess the resistance of asphalt mixes to permanent deformations, the wheel tracking tests are frequently used, what requires specialized equipment as well as relatively large size samples. For this reason, researchers are seeking for a more simple test that will help to assess the rut resistance of asphalt mixes. According to Christensen and Bonaquist as well as Zaniewski and Srinivasan, this may be the indirect tensile strength (ITS) test. Therefore, this research experimentally examined the relationship of ITS results on rutting parameters, i.e. proportional rut depth (PRDAIR) and wheel tracking speed (WTSAIR). The samples of asphalt concrete (AC), as well as SMA and BBTM, were compacted with the Marshall hammer, but ITS tests were conducted with a typical Marshall press, at a loading rate of 50 mm/min. The test results indicated the need for separate analysis of continuous type mixtures (AC) and gap-graded mixtures (SMA and BBTM). The relationship of ITS results with rutting parameters depends on: the type of mixture gradation (higher correlation coefficients were obtained for gap-graded mixtures) and ITS test temperatures (test results at 40°C achieved better correlations than those obtained at 25°C). Using the regression analyses, the prediction limits as well as confidence limits were calculated, which allowed to develop criteria for classifications of asphalt mixture resistance to rutting categories, on the basis of ITS test.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Transport Systems and Technology

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Roads, Railways and Traffic Engineering, Cracow University of Technology, Cracow, Poland

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Ahmed M. A. · International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications · 2013 · 3 · 2249
2. 10.1080/14680629.2016.126172210.1080/14680629.2016.1261722 ↗
3. 10.3141/2210-0110.3141/2210-01 ↗
4. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.09410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.12.094 ↗
6. Błażejowski, K. & Dołżycki, B. (2014). The relationship between asphalt mix rutting resistance and MSCR test results. InProceedings of the Geo Hubei International Conference on Sustainable Civil Infrastructure: Design, Analysis and Asphalt Material Characterization for Road and Airfield Pavements, GSP 246(pp. 202–209). ASCE.10.1061/9780784478462.025 ↗
7. Button J. W. · Transportation Research Records · 1990 · 1259 · 141
8. Cai X. · Advances in Materials Science and Engineering · 2017 · 10
9. Christensen D. W. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2002 · 71 · 692
10. Christensen D. W. · 2007 · 62
11. Christensen D. W. · 2004 · 44
12. 10.1080/10298436.2018.143036510.1080/10298436.2018.1430365 ↗
13. Generalna Dyrekcja Dróg Krajowych i Autostrad · 2014
14. 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.89510.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.895 ↗
15. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
16. Khousla N. P. · 2007
17. Khousla, N. P., Sadasivam, S. & Malpass, G. (2001).Performance evaluation of fine graded superpave mixtures for surface courses(Report No. FHWA/NC/2002-005). Department of Civil Engineering, North Carolina State University, p. 81.
18. Kim K. W. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2011 · 39 · 5910.1520/JTE102385 ↗
19. Kruger J. · 2005 · 380
20. 10.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.00310.17265/2159-5313/2016.09.003 ↗
21. Park, D. W., Chowdhury, A. & Button, J. (2001).Effect of aggregate gradation and angularity on VMA and rutting resistance(Report No. ICAR/201-3 F), Texas Transportation Institute, p. 84.
22. Pellinen, T. K. & Xiao, S. (2006).Stiffness of hot mix asphalt(Final Report No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2005/20). Purdue University.10.5703/1288284313390 ↗
23. PN-EN 12697-22. (2008). Bituminous mixtures. Test methods for hot mix asphalt. Whell tracking.
24. PN-EN 12697-23. (2010). Bituminous mixtures. Test methods for hot mix asphalt. Determination of the indirect tensile strength of bituminous specimens.
25. PN-EN 12697-30. (2008). Bituminous mixtures. Test methods for hot mix asphalt. Specimen preparation by impact compactor.
26. PN-EN 12697-33. (2008). Bituminous mixtures. Test methods for hot mix asphalt. Specimen preparation by roller compactor.
27. 10.1080/14680629.2017.137499410.1080/14680629.2017.1374994 ↗
28. Tang, Y. & Haddock, J. (2006).Investigation of the performance of neat and modified asphalt binders(Report No. FHWA/IN/JTRP-2006/13). Purdue University, p. 115.10.5703/1288284313381 ↗
29. Thiessen, M., Shalaby, A. & Kavanagh, L. (2000). Strength testing of in-service asphalt pavements in Manitoba and correlation to rutting.Proceedings of the Canadian Technical Asphalt Association(vol. 45, pp. 203–227).
30. Wang H. · Advances in Materials Science and Engineering · 2016 · 9
31. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.01510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.12.015 ↗
32. Yeggoni, M., Button, J. W. & Zollinger, D. G. (1994).Influence of coarse aggregate shape and surface texture on rutting of hot mix asphalt concrete(Report No. FHWA/TX-94/1244-6). Texas Transportation Institute, p. 147.
33. Zaniewski J. P. · 2004
34. Zaniewski J. P. · 2004
35. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.01310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.013 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.02.00510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.02.005 ↗
37. 10.2478/ace-2019-003210.2478/ace-2019-0032 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.ijprt.2017.03.00810.1016/j.ijprt.2017.03.008 ↗