Evaluation of the sensitivity of different indices to the moisture resistance of bituminous mixes modified by hydrated lime and other modifiers
Source abstract
Abstract
The beneficial effect of hydrated lime added as filler to bituminous mixes in improving the moisture damage resistance of mixes has been known for a long time. However, the effect of binder modification using hydrated lime is less explored. Similarly, very little information is available on the influence of hydrated lime on the moisture resistance of bituminous mixes under critical conditions of high temperature and slow rate of loading. Extensive experimental investigations were conducted in the present study to quantify the relative beneficial effect of addition of hydrated lime in dry and wet methods on the moisture resistance of bituminous mixes. In the dry method, 1.5% and 2% lime (by weight of dry aggregate) was added as filler whereas in the wet method, VG30 and VG40 bitumen were modified using 20% and 30% lime (by weight of virgin binder). The moisture damage resistance of these mixes was evaluated by conducting different tests such as indirect tensile strength, dynamic modulus and dynamic creep tests to assess the sensitivity of different mix parameters in estimating the moisture resistance and to measure the influence of moisture damage on the mechanical properties and rutting performance. The performance of the conventional and lime-modified mixes was also compared with that of polymer and crumb rubber-modified bituminous mixes since lime-modified mixes have been evaluated in this study as possible alternatives to PMB and CRMB mixes, which are popularly used for roads with high traffic volumes. Lime-modified mixes were found to have the best moisture resistance compared to unmodified mixes and PMB- and CRMB-modified mixes. Evaluation of moisture damage in terms of dynamic modulus and dynamic creep tests was found to be significantly more sensitive to moisture damage compared to tensile strength ratio. The beneficial effect of lime has been observed to be significantly more under more severe conditions of high temperature and slow rate of loading compared to lower temperature and high frequency conditions.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. AASTHO T 100. (2006). Standard method of test for specific gravity of soils. Author.
2. AASHTO T283. (2003). Standard method of test for resistance of compacted asphalt mixtures to moisture-induced damage. Author.
3. 10.2478/ijpeat-2013-000210.2478/ijpeat-2013-0002 ↗
4. Aschenbrener T. · Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 1995 · 64 · 163
5. ASTM C25-11. (2011). Standard test methods for chemical analysis of limestone, quicklime, and hydrated lime. Author.
6. ASTM D4867-14. (2014). Standard test method for effect of moisture on asphalt concrete paving mixtures. Author.
7. ASTM D6931-12. (2012). Standard test method for indirect tensile (IDT) strength of bituminous mixtures. Author.
8. Atud, T. J., Kanitpong, K. & MArtono, W. (2007). Laboratory evaluation of hydrated lime application process in asphalt mixture for moisture damage and rutting resistance. Transportation Research Board 86th annual meeting, Washington, DC.
9. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:2(73)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2009)21:2(73) ↗
10. British Standards Institution. (1996). Development of method for determining resistance to permanent deformation of bituminous mixtures subject to unconfined dynamic loading. British Standard Draft for Development. London: Author.
11. 10.1080/1029843070179212810.1080/10298430701792128 ↗
12. 10.1080/1029843070179214410.1080/10298430701792144 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.01410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.014 ↗
14. Clyne, T. R., Li, X., Marasteanu, M. O. & Skok, E. L. (2003). Dynamic and resilient modulus of MN/DOT asphalt mixtures. Report No. MN/RC-2003-09. Retrieved from http://www.cts.umn.edu/Publications/ResearchReports/reportdetail.html?id=661
15. Cross, S. A. & Voth, M. D. (2001). Effect of sample preconditioning on asphalt pavement analyzer (APA) wet rut depths. Transportation Research Board 80th annual meeting, Washington, DC.
16. Flintsch, G. W., Imad, P. E., Al-Qadi, L., Loulizi, A. & Mokarem, D. (2005). Laboratory tests for hot-mix asphalt characterization in Virginia. Report No. VTRC 05-CR22. Retrieved from http://www.virginiadot.org/vtrc/main/online_reports/pdf/05-cr22.pdf
17. Flintsch, G. W., Loulizi, A., Diefenderfer, S. D., Galal, K. A. & Diefenderfer, B. K. (2007). Asphalt materials characterization in support of implementation of the proposed mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide. Report No. VTRC 07-CR10. Retrieved from https://vtechoks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/46674/07-cr10.pdf?sequence=1
18. Gardiner, M. S. & Epps, J. A. (1987). Four variables affecting the performance of lime in asphalt-aggregate mixture (Transportation Research Record No. 1115). Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 12–22.
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.12.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.12.001 ↗
20. 10.1080/10298436.2010.53553910.1080/10298436.2010.535539 ↗
21. Hao P. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2006 · 34 · 1
22. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000006410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000064 ↗
23. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:6(711)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:6(711) ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.01910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.019 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.11.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.11.007 ↗
26. Kakade, V. B. (2015). Evaluation of hydrated lime modified bituminous mixes (Unpublished PhD thesis). Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur.
27. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.06610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.03.066 ↗
28. Kandhal P. S. · Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2001 · 70 · 301
29. 10.1080/1029843060096512210.1080/10298430600965122 ↗
30. Khattak, M. J. & Kyatham, V. (2008). Viscoelastic behaviour of hydrated lime-modified asphalt matrix and hot-mix asphalt under moisture damage conditions (Transportation Research Record No. 1454). Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 64–74.10.3141/2057-08 ↗
31. 10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:10(659)10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2008)20:10(659) ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.01910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.08.019 ↗
33. Lee, S. (2007). Investigation of the effects of lime on the performance of HMA using advanced testing and modelling techniques (PhD thesis). North Carolina State University, Raleigh., Retrieved from http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/resolver/1840.16/4456
34. 10.1007/s12205-010-0944-410.1007/s12205-010-0944-4 ↗
35. 10.1080/14680629.2012.74366910.1080/14680629.2012.743669 ↗
36. Loulizi, A., Flintsch, G. W., Al-Qadi, I. L. & Mokarem, D. (2006). Comparing resilient modulus and dynamic modulus of hot-mix asphalt as material properties for flexible pavement design (Transportation Research Record No. 1611). Journal of the Transportation.
37. Lu, Q. & Harvey, J. T. (2006). Long-term effectiveness of antistripping additives (Transportation Research Record No. 1970). Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 14–24.10.1177/0361198106197000102 ↗
38. McCann, M. & Sebaaly, P. E. (2003). Evaluation of moisture sensitivity and performance of lime in hot-mix asphalt (Transportation Research Record No. 1832). Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 9–16.10.3141/1832-02 ↗
39. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000014610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000146 ↗
40. Mohammad, L. N., Saadeh, S., Kabir, M. D., Othman, A. & Cooper, S. (2008). Mechanistic properties of hot-mix asphalt mixtures containing hydrated lime (Transportation Research Record No. 2051). Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 59–63.
41. MoRTH · 2001
42. Nadkarni, A. A., Kaloush, K. E., Zeiada, W. A. & Biligiri, K. P. (2009). Using the dynamic modulus test for moisture susceptibility evaluation of asphalt mixtures (Transportation Research Record No. 2127). Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 29–35.10.3141/2127-04 ↗
43. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000065810.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000658 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.01010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.010 ↗
45. Petersen, J. C., Plancher, H. & Harnsberger, P. M. (1987). Lime treatment of asphalt to reduce age hardening and improve flow properties. In Proceedings of the Association Asphalt Paving Technologists (Vol. 56, pp. 632–653). Lino Lakes, MN: Association Asphalt Paving Technologists (AAPT).
46. Shahadan Z. · Indian Journal of Engineering and Material Sciences · 2013 · 20 · 376
47. Shatnawti, S., Nagarajaiah, M. & Harvey, J. (1995). Moisture sensitivity evaluation of binder-aggregate mixtures (Transportation Research Record No. 1492). Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, pp. 71–84.
48. Solaimanian, M., Bonaquist, R. F., Soltani, A. & Tandon, V. (2007). Improved conditioning and testing procedures for HMA moisture susceptibility (National Cooperative Highway Research Program, NCHRP Report 589). Transportation Research Board, Washington DC.
49. Solaimanian M. · Journal of Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists · 2006 · 75 · 345
50. 10.1080/14680629.2015.101752010.1080/14680629.2015.1017520 ↗
51. SP-2 · 2004
52. 10.1080/14680629.2013.77475310.1080/14680629.2013.774753 ↗
53. 10.1617/1398610.1617/13986 ↗
54. Yang X. · Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering · 2014 · 27 · 1
55. Zeng M. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation · 2008 · 37 · 1