journal article·2023-04-25Open access

Ageing characteristics of polyethylene-modified asphalt binders blended with different compatibilisers

K. Lakshmi Roja, Eyad Masad, Senthil Kumar Krishnamoorthy, Mabrouk Ouederni

Road Materials and Pavement Design· Volume 24· Issue sup1

Abstract

In this study, virgin low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and recycled polyethylene (RPE) were blended with an asphalt binder in combination with compatibilizers such as styrene-butadiene-styrene (SBS), Elvaloy, sulfur, and polyphosphoric acid (PPA): LDPE, LDPE + SBS + Sulfur, LDPE + Elvaloy, LDPE + Elvaloy + PPA, LDPE + sulfur, RPE, RPE + sulfur, and RPE + PPA. This study aimed to investigate (1) the distribution of PE in asphalt binder, (2) chemical changes in the binder due to the addition of compatibilizers, and (3) the ageing characteristics and their effects on the rheological and performance properties. Micrographs revealed that the LDPE dispersity improved with the addition of Elvaloy. The PE blends with sulfur met the target performance grade of PG76V-10. The PE blends with sulfur exhibited the highest fatigue life at low strain levels and degraded rapidly with an increase in strain level. The LDPE blends with Elvaloy experienced the least degradation in fatigue life with an increased strain level; this low ageing susceptibility was due to the lowest carbonyl (Ic=o) and sulfoxide (Is=o) index values.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Mechanical Engineering Program, Texas A&M University at Qatar, Doha, Qatar

Qatar Petrochemical Company (QAPCO), Doha, Qatar

Funding

Qatar National Research Fund

References (37)

Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO M 332-2014 (2014). Specification for performance based asphalt binder using multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) Test. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Washington D.C USA.
2. AASHTO T 391-20 (2020). Standard method of test for estimating fatigue resistance of asphalt binders using the linear amplitude sweep. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Washington D.C USA.
3. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000422010.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004220 ↗
4. ASTM D6648-08 (2016). Standard test method for determining the flexural creep stiffness of asphalt binder using the bending beam rheometer (BBR). ASTM International West Conshohocken PA.
5. ASTM D7405-20 (2020 January 15). Standard test method for multiple stress creep and recovery (MSCR) of Asphalt Binder using a dynamic shear rheometer. West Conshohocken PA: ASTM International.
6. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.00310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.003 ↗
7. 10.1177/009524431246996410.1177/0095244312469964 ↗
8. 10.1007/s40890-016-0015-810.1007/s40890-016-0015-8 ↗
9. 10.1617/s11527-018-1170-710.1617/s11527-018-1170-7 ↗
10. 10.1080/10298436.2022.208669310.1080/10298436.2022.2086693 ↗
11. 10.1177/036119811878202310.1177/0361198118782023 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.03.00710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.03.007 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.jiec.2016.08.01710.1016/j.jiec.2016.08.017 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.04210.1016/j.fuel.2017.04.042 ↗
15. Nivedya M. Roja K. L. Veeraragavan A. & Krishnan J. M. (2013 June 9-12). Rheological investigations on foamed bitumen. In Airfield and highway pavement 2013: Sustainable and efficient pavements (pp. 967–976). Los Angeles CA: American Society of Civil Engineers.10.1061/9780784413005.080 ↗
16. 10.1080/10298436.2015.100723010.1080/10298436.2015.1007230 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.00210.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.10.002 ↗
18. 10.1080/14680629.2009.969021410.1080/14680629.2009.9690214 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.04310.1016/j.jcis.2004.08.043 ↗
20. QCS (2014). Qatar construction specifications; Ministry of Municipality and Environment: Doha Qatar.
21. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000419410.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0004194 ↗
22. 10.1177/036119811985145810.1177/0361198119851458 ↗
23. 10.1080/14680629.2020.176485810.1080/14680629.2020.1764858 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11968910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119689 ↗
25. 10.1080/10298436.2017.129326910.1080/10298436.2017.1293269 ↗
26. Roja K. L. Rehman A. Masad E. & Abdala A. (2020). Low density polyethylene for asphalt binder modification. In Advances in materials and pavement performance prediction II (pp. 324–328). CRC Press.10.1201/9781003027362-76 ↗
27. 10.1081/LFT-12000357710.1081/LFT-120003577 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.3681010.1002/app.36810 ↗
29. 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-462810.1002/(ISSN)1097-4628 ↗
30. 10.1080/14680629.2019.169457210.1080/14680629.2019.1694572 ↗
31. 10.1155/2016/291546710.1155/2016/2915467 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.06410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.03.064 ↗
33. Youtcheff J. (2016). Automated high-performance liquid chromatography saturate aromatic resin and asphaltene separation (Tech. Rep.). Federal Highway Administration.
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.07510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.08.075 ↗
35. 10.1520/JTE2111-EB10.1520/JTE2111-EB ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.04710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.04.047 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.02.00510.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.02.005 ↗