journal article·2022-01-02

Using artificial neural networks to predict the 28-day compressive strength of roller-compacted concrete pavements containing RAP aggregates

Solomon Debbarma, G. D. Ransinchung R.N.

Publisher page

Abstract

This paper presents an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) model to predict the 28-day compressive strength of roller-compacted concrete pavement (RCCP) mixes containing reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) aggregates. Three supervised learning ANN algorithms, namely, Levenberg–Marquardt (LM), Bayesian Regularisation (BR), and Scaled-Conjugate Gradient (SCG) were used to predict the 28-day compressive strength of the RAP-RCCP mixes. It was observed that constructed ANN models showed good prediction between the input parameters and the output value. In fact, the BR-ANN model of 13–9–1 (13 neurons in the input layer, 9 hidden neurons, and 1 output layer) architecture showed an excellent prediction amongst the supervised learning ANN models with the coefficient of determination of 0.985 in the testing phase. Using 2-hidden layers (13–9–9–1 architecture) was found to have the highest precision with the regression values for the training, validation, and testing being 0.975, 0.994, and 0.961, respectively. In fact, the constructed model predicted the 28-day compressive strength with a very low MSE of 0.99 MPa. Hence, it can be concluded that the use of ANN could be used to predict the compressive strength of RCCP mixes containing varying types of RAP. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis was also carried out to study the effect of the influencing and contribution input parameters to the output prediction.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Innovative concrete reinforcement materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Transportation Engineering Group, Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology

References (55)

Show source-provided references
1. ACI. (2014). Guide to roller compacted concrete pavements. American Concrete Institute, ACI-327R.
2. Adeli, H., & Hung, S. (1994). Machine learning neural networks, genetic algorithms, and fuzzy systems. John Wiley Sons Inc.
3. 10.24200/tjer.vol6iss1pp37-4510.24200/tjer.vol6iss1pp37-45 ↗
4. ASTM. (2012). Standard test methods for laboratory compaction characteristics of soil using modified effort. ASTM Int. ASTM D1557.
5. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.07810.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.078 ↗
6. BIS. (1959). Methods of test for strength of concrete. Bur. Indian Stand. IS:516 New Delhi India.
7. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.05410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.05.054 ↗
8. 10.1080/19648189.2018.148279210.1080/19648189.2018.1482792 ↗
9. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000140310.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001403 ↗
10. 10.14359/5168717610.14359/51687176 ↗
11. Burden, F., & Winkler, D. (2008). Bayesian regularization of neural networks. In D. J. Livingstone (Ed.), Artificial neural networks. Methods in Molecular Biology (pp. 23–42). Humana Press.10.1007/978-1-60327-101-1_3 ↗
12. 10.1007/s00500-009-0410-810.1007/s00500-009-0410-8 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.04010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.08.040 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.04710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.12.047 ↗
15. 10.1177/036119811984958510.1177/0361198119849585 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.06310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.04.063 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.06410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.02.064 ↗
18. 10.1186/s40069-018-0227-x10.1186/s40069-018-0227-x ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.13610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.136 ↗
20. 10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00345-810.1016/S0008-8846(00)00345-8 ↗
21. 10.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2010.3(5).25110.6135/ijprt.org.tw/2010.3(5).251 ↗
22. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000083210.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0000832 ↗
23. 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01155.x10.1111/j.1539-6924.1988.tb01155.x ↗
24. IRC. (2005). Guidelines for construction of roller compacted concrete pavements. Indian Roads Congr. IRC SP-68 New Delhi India.
25. 10.3390/mca2102002010.3390/mca21020020 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.04410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.11.044 ↗
27. Ki, Ö, & Uncuo, E. (2005). Comparison of three back-propagation training algorithms for two case studies. Indian Journal of Engineering and Materials Sciences, 12, 434–442.
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.10.017 ↗
29. 10.1109/TNN.2002.103195110.1109/TNN.2002.1031951 ↗
30. 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.000224210.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002242 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.10.00110.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.10.001 ↗
32. 10.1162/neco.1992.4.3.41510.1162/neco.1992.4.3.415 ↗
33. Milne L. (1995 November). Feature selection using neural networks with contribution measures. In AI-conference (pp. 571–571). World Scientific Publishing.
34. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.07210.1016/j.matdes.2014.07.072 ↗
35. 10.1016/S0893-6080(05)80056-510.1016/S0893-6080(05)80056-5 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.08710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.02.087 ↗
37. 10.1520/STP16132018000810.1520/STP161320180008 ↗
38. Okafor, F. O. (2010). Performance of recycled asphalt pavement as coarse aggregate in concrete. Leonardo Electronic Journal of Practices and Technologies, 9, 47–58.
39. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.05410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.01.054 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.00910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.08.009 ↗
41. Pellinen T. (2001). Investigation of the use of dynamic modulus as an indicator of hot-mix asphalt performance [Doctoral dissertation Arizona State University]. https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=5346832
42. Ranganathan A. (2004). The Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm 3 LM as a blend of gradient descent and Gauss-Newton itera. Internet httpexcelsior cs ucsb educoursescs290ipdfL MA pdf 142 1–5
43. 10.1016/j.epsr.2007.11.00310.1016/j.epsr.2007.11.003 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.03910.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.10.039 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.17410.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.06.174 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.00410.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.004 ↗
47. 10.1080/10298436.2018.153313410.1080/10298436.2018.1533134 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.17910.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.179 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.03010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.05.030 ↗
50. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138007110.1080/14680629.2017.1380071 ↗
51. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.13110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.131 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.02310.1016/j.geomorph.2012.04.023 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.00510.1016/j.matdes.2008.04.005 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2007.06.01110.1016/j.commatsci.2007.06.011 ↗
55. 10.1080/14680629.2020.177330410.1080/14680629.2020.1773304 ↗