Automatic pavement distress severity detection using deep learning
Source abstract
Abstract
Roads are one of the most critical infrastructures, which should be maintained at a high quality of service. For this purpose, road pavement should be assessed cost-effectively. In the past, image processing methods were used to analyze pavement conditions. In recent years, machine learning methods have been employed, while now deep learning methods are applied. Deep learning has outperformed other methods regarding the accuracy and speed of pavement distress evaluation. In this research, a deep learning algorithm called YOLOv5 is deployed to detect pavement block cracking and estimate its severity using images taken from the right of way via a road surface profiler. Two models are successfully trained and tested, one to detect block cracking and the other to predict its severity with a sufficient level of accuracy of 84.5% and 76.6%, respectively. It is concluded that the model not only can detect block cracking but also predict its severity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
References (60)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.autcon.2022.10441210.1016/j.autcon.2022.104412 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.10393510.1016/j.autcon.2021.103935 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.dib.2021.10713310.1016/j.dib.2021.107133 ↗
4. 10.48550/arxiv.2209.0853810.48550/arxiv.2209.08538 ↗
5. 10.1109/BigData50022.2020.937779010.1109/BigData50022.2020.9377790 ↗
6. ASTM D6433- 18 Standard Practice for Roads and Parking Lots Pavement Condition Index Surveys. (n.d.)
7. 10.1007/b1196310.1007/b11963 ↗
8. 10.1111/mice.1226310.1111/mice.12263 ↗
9. 10.1111/mice.1233410.1111/mice.12334 ↗
10. 10.35940/ijitee.L3550.108121910.35940/ijitee.L3550.1081219 ↗
11. 10.1080/10298436.2020.171404710.1080/10298436.2020.1714047 ↗
12. 10.3390/s11100962810.3390/s111009628 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11938310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119383 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.01710.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.017 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.11010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.110 ↗
16. 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.000083610.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000836 ↗
17. 10.1007/978-3-030-29516-510.1007/978-3-030-29516-5 ↗
18. 10.3390/app1016550610.3390/app10165506 ↗
19. 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.000091810.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000918 ↗
20. 10.13176/11.16710.13176/11.167 ↗
21. 10.1080/15732479.2020.183855910.1080/15732479.2020.1838559 ↗
22. 10.1080/10298436.2020.183320410.1080/10298436.2020.1833204 ↗
23. 10.1080/15732479.2019.158123010.1080/15732479.2019.1581230 ↗
24. 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.000061810.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000618 ↗
25. 10.1109/BigData50022.2020.937784710.1109/BigData50022.2020.9377847 ↗
26. 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.000089010.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000890 ↗
27. 10.1177/1475921721105377610.1177/14759217211053776 ↗
28. 10.1109/5.72679110.1109/5.726791 ↗
29. 10.1080/15732479.2011.56016310.1080/15732479.2011.560163 ↗
30. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.298902810.1109/ACCESS.2020.2989028 ↗
31. 10.1080/10298436.2018.148591710.1080/10298436.2018.1485917 ↗
32. 10.1155/2019/181376310.1155/2019/1813763 ↗
33. 10.1111/mice.1262210.1111/mice.12622 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.11851310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118513 ↗
35. 10.1177/036119812090728310.1177/0361198120907283 ↗
36. 10.1109/BigData.2018.862232710.1109/BigData.2018.8622327 ↗
37. 10.1080/15732479.2018.144617910.1080/15732479.2018.1446179 ↗
38. MathWorks. (1984). What is deep learning?. https://in.mathworks.com/products/deep-learning.html
39. McQueen, J. M. (2004). A study of manual vs automated pavement condition surveys. UU Auburn Univ.
40. Mogul b. (2022). bekir Dataset. Roboflow. https://universe.roboflow.com/bekir-mogul/bekir
41. 10.1109/BigData50022.2020.937775110.1109/BigData50022.2020.9377751 ↗
42. Padsumbiya, M., Brahmbhatt, V., & Thakkar, S. P. (2022). Automatic crack detection using convolutional neural network. Journal of Soft Computing in Civil Engineering, 6(3), 1–17.
43. 10.22260/ISARC2017/006610.22260/ISARC2017/0066 ↗
44. “Roads Dataset.”. (2022). Roboflow. https://universe.roboflow.com/primedks-gmail-com/roads-sgmts
45. 10.1080/15732479.2010.55030410.1080/15732479.2010.550304 ↗
46. 10.1109/ITSC.2013.672852910.1109/ITSC.2013.6728529 ↗
47. Sarmiento J.-A. (2021). Pavement distress detection and segmentation using YOLOv4 and DeepLabv3 on pavements in the Philippines.
48. 10.1109/COASE.2018.856037210.1109/COASE.2018.8560372 ↗
49. Shahin M. Y. (2005). Pavement management for airports roads and parking lots: Second edition. Pavement Manag. Airports Roads Park. Lots Second Ed.
50. Sivaneswaran, N., Pierce, L. M., & Mahoney, J. P. (2004). Transition from manual to automated pavement condition surveys : Washington state’s experience. 6th int. Conf. Manag. Pavements, (October): 13.
51. 10.1080/14680629.2019.161496910.1080/14680629.2019.1614969 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.11.00110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2005.11.001 ↗
53. Urban G. Geras K. J. Kahou S. E. Aslan O. Wang M. Caruana S. Mohamed R. Philipose A. & Richardson M. (2016). “Do deep convolutional nets really need to be deep and convolutional?” arXiv Prepr. arXiv1603.05691.
54. Waghchoure M. (2022). “RoadHazardMonitoring Dataset.” Roboflow. https://universe.roboflow.com/mayur-waghchoure/roadhazardmonitoring
55. 10.1016/j.neucom.2020.01.08510.1016/j.neucom.2020.01.085 ↗
56. 10.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.000073610.1061/(asce)cp.1943-5487.0000736 ↗
57. 10.1109/ICIP.2016.753305210.1109/ICIP.2016.7533052 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.autcon.2021.10399110.1016/j.autcon.2021.103991 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.patrec.2011.11.00410.1016/j.patrec.2011.11.004 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.patrec.2011.11.00410.1016/j.patrec.2011.11.004 ↗