Estimation of Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement (RAP) characteristics using simple indicative tests
Source abstract
Abstract
The design of hot recycled asphalt mixes with high RAP content, say more than 25%, as per existing guidelines is complex compared to the conventional Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) design. This is due to the fact that the mix design requires the properties of bitumen in the RAP material and hence, it involves using solvents to recover the bitumen and testing of the recovered bitumen using sophisticated equipment. Considering the issues associated with bitumen recovery procedure that were reported in the literature and the practicalities involved in testing the recovered bitumen, the present study aims to identify indices that can reasonably estimate the RAP characteristics without the need to recover the bitumen. For this purpose, two tests namely, the Fragmentation test and Cohesion test that were proposed by the RIlEM Technical Committee 237-SIB committee for RAP classification for cold mix design were evaluated. These two tests can be conducted using conventional apparatus used for quality control tests that are available at most of the field laboratories. Fragmentation test was carried out on six different RAP sources and at three different conditioning temperatures (5°C, 20°C, and 40°C). Cohesion test was carried out on RAP from five different sources at five conditioning temperatures (70°C, 100°C, 140°C, 170°C, and 190°C). The test results suggest that the index derived from fragmentation test (Sfrag) correlated well with the physical properties of recovered bitumen such as penetration, softening point, and complex shear viscosity. Further, the index was able to estimate the difference in % of fines in black and white curves. The sensitivity of the air voids and Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS) of the Marshall specimen (Sair voids and SITS) obtained from the cohesion test correlated well with bitumen content and bitumen type respectively.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation · Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Geotechnical and construction materials studies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur, Kharagpur, India
References (64)
Show source-provided references
1. AASHTO M 323-17 · 2017
2. AASHTO T 164-14 · 2018
3. AASHTO T 180-20 · 2020
4. AASHTO T 308-10 · 2010
5. Al-Qadi I. L. · 2012
6. Al-Qadi I. L. · 2009
7. ASTM C136/ C136M-19 · 2019
8. ASTM D1557-12 · 2012
9. ASTM D36/ D36M-14 · 2020
10. ASTM D5404/ D5404M-12 · 2017
11. ASTM D5/ D5M-20 · 2020
12. ASTM D6323-19 · 2019
13. ASTM D6752/ D6752M-18 · 2018
14. ASTM D6926-20 · 2020
15. ASTM D8225 – 19 · 2019
16. Austroads · 2014
17. Bazant Z. P. · ACI Materials Journal · 1988 · 85 · 262
18. 10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.000072610.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000726 ↗
19. Burr B. L. · Transportation Research Record · 1990
20. Burr B. L. · Transportation Research Record · 1991
21. Burr B. L. · Transportation Research Record · 1993
22. 10.1111/jmi.1241210.1111/jmi.12412 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.05510.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.055 ↗
24. Cipione C. A. · Transportation Research Record · 1991
25. Copeland, A. (2011). Reclaimed asphalt pavement in asphalt mixtures: State of the practice (No. FHWA-HRT-11-021). United States. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Research, Development, and Technology. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/infrastructure/pavements/11021/11021.pdf
26. Davison, R. R., Bullin, J. A., Glover, C. J., Burr Jr, B. L., Jemison, H. B., Kyle, A. L. G. & Cipione, C. A. (1989). Development of gel permeation chromatography, infrared and other tests to characterize asphalt cements and correlate with field performance. Volume II. Appendices (No. FHWA/TX-90/458-1F).
27. Denneman E. · 2013
28. EN 13108-1. (2016). Bituminous mixtures: Material specifications: Part 1: Asphalt concrete. European Committee for Standardization.
29. 10.1617/s11527-015-0541-610.1617/s11527-015-0541-6 ↗
30. 10.1080/14680629.2017.130423410.1080/14680629.2017.1304234 ↗
31. IRC:120 · 2015
32. 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.00910.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.009 ↗
33. 10.1177/036119811882136610.1177/0361198118821366 ↗
34. Kim, S., Byron, T., Sholar, G. A. & Kim, J. (2007). Evaluation of use of high percentage of reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP) for superpave mixtures. Florida University. https://fdotwww.blob.core.windows.net/sitefinity/docs/default-source/content/materials/administration/resources/library/publications/researchreports/bituminous/07-507.pdf?sfvrsn=cab65134_0
35. 10.1088/1757-899X/236/1/01202110.1088/1757-899X/236/1/012021 ↗
36. 10.1080/14680629.2014.92741110.1080/14680629.2014.927411 ↗
37. 10.1080/10298436.2015.112627110.1080/10298436.2015.1126271 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.12310.1016/j.proeng.2015.07.123 ↗
39. McDaniel, R. S., Soleymani, H., Anderson, R. M., Turner, P. & Peterson, R. (2000). Recommended use of reclaimed asphalt pavement in the Superpave mix design method. NCHRP Web document, 30. http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/nchrp/nchrp_w30-a.pdf
40. 10.1080/14680629.2019.166324410.1080/14680629.2019.1663244 ↗
41. Ministry of Road Transport & Highways. (2019). Bharatmala: Road to prosperity, India (Report No. MoRTH 2019–20). https://morth.nic.in/sites/default/files/Ministry%20Annual%20Report_2019-20.pdf
42. 10.1080/14680629.2012.65707010.1080/14680629.2012.657070 ↗
43. MoRTH · 2013
44. MS-20 · 1986
45. MS-2 · 2014
46. 10.3141/2370-0110.3141/2370-01 ↗
47. 10.5276/JSWTM.2013.23410.5276/JSWTM.2013.234 ↗
48. 10.1115/1.365690010.1115/1.3656900 ↗
49. 10.1007/978-94-017-7342-3_7710.1007/978-94-017-7342-3_77 ↗
50. Peterson R. L. · 2000 · 69 · 72
51. 10.1080/14680629.2019.159022510.1080/14680629.2019.1590225 ↗
52. 10.3141/2444-0810.3141/2444-08 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.01.01810.1016/j.resconrec.2013.01.018 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.04510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.045 ↗
55. 10.1080/14680629.2015.102967810.1080/14680629.2015.1029678 ↗
56. 10.1617/s11527-018-1238-410.1617/s11527-018-1238-4 ↗
57. 10.1617/s11527-019-1365-610.1617/s11527-019-1365-6 ↗
58. 10.1617/s11527-018-1253-510.1617/s11527-018-1253-5 ↗
59. Tran, N. H., Taylor, A. & Willis, R. (2012). Effect of rejuvenator on performance properties of HMA mixtures with high RAP and RAS contents (NCAT Report, 12-05). http://ww.ncat.us/files/reports/2012/rep12-05.pdf
60. West R. · 2013
61. Witczak M. W. · 2002
62. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.00710.1016/j.resconrec.2014.07.007 ↗
63. Zhou, F. (2019). Development of an ideal cracking test for asphalt mix design, quality control and quality assurance (NCHRP-IDEA Program Project Final Report, 195). http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/IDEA/FinalReports/Highway/NCHRP195.pdf
64. 10.1080/14680629.2017.138908210.1080/14680629.2017.1389082 ↗